Social prescribing: less rhetoric and more reality. A systematic review of the evidence

Objectives Social prescribing is a way of linking patients in primary care with sources of support within the community to help improve their health and well-being. Social prescribing programmes are being widely promoted and adopted in the UK National Health Service and so we conducted a systematic review to assess the evidence for their effectiveness. Setting/data sources Nine databases were searched from 2000 to January 2016 for studies conducted in the UK. Relevant reports and guidelines, websites and reference lists of retrieved articles were scanned to identify additional studies. All the searches were restricted to English language only. Participants Systematic reviews and any published evaluation of programmes where patient referral was made from a primary care setting to a link worker or facilitator of social prescribing were eligible for inclusion. Risk of bias for included studies was undertaken independently by two reviewers and a narrative synthesis was performed. Primary and secondary outcome measures Primary outcomes of interest were any measures of health and well-being and/or usage of health services. Results We included a total of 15 evaluations of social prescribing programmes. Most were small scale and limited by poor design and reporting. All were rated as a having a high risk of bias. Common design issues included a lack of comparative controls, short follow-up durations, a lack of standardised and validated measuring tools, missing data and a failure to consider potential confounding factors. Despite clear methodological shortcomings, most evaluations presented positive conclusions. Conclusions Social prescribing is being widely advocated and implemented but current evidence fails to provide sufficient detail to judge either success or value for money. If social prescribing is to realise its potential, future evaluations must be comparative by design and consider when, by whom, for whom, how well and at what cost. Trial registration number PROSPERO Registration: CRD42015023501.

[1]  I. Harvey,et al.  A randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a referrals facilitator between primary care and the voluntary sector , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  M. Faulkner Supporting the psychosocial needs of patients in general practice: the role of a voluntary referral service. , 2004, Patient education and counseling.

[3]  Housing Lin,et al.  Department of Health White Paper - Our health our care our say: a new direction for community services , 2007 .

[4]  K. Shojania,et al.  The tension between needing to improve care and knowing how to do it. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  M. Buszewicz,et al.  Facilitating access to voluntary and community services for patients with psychosocial problems: a before-after evaluation , 2008 .

[7]  S. White,et al.  Can social prescribing provide the missing link? , 2008, Primary Health Care Research & Development.

[8]  M Hillsdon,et al.  Effect of exercise referral schemes in primary care on physical activity and improving health outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  J. Higgins Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration , 2011 .

[10]  S. Sutton,et al.  Effectiveness of physical activity promotion based in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials , 2012, British medical journal.

[11]  J. Higgins,et al.  Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration , 2013 .

[12]  J. Powell,et al.  Measuring the economic impact of the wellspring healthy living centre's social prescribing wellbeing programme for low level mental health issues encountered by GP services , 2013 .

[13]  Simon Evans,et al.  The Role of Community Centre-based Arts, Leisure and Social Activities in Promoting Adult Well-being and Healthy Lifestyles , 2013, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[14]  J. Donnelly,et al.  Does increased prescribed exercise alter non‐exercise physical activity/energy expenditure in healthy adults? A systematic review , 2014, Clinical obesity.

[15]  N. Bashir,et al.  The social and economic impact of the Rotherham Social Prescribing Pilot: Main evaluation report , 2014 .

[16]  A. O’Cathain,et al.  Exploring the components and impact of social prescribing , 2015 .

[17]  L. Morton,et al.  Improving wellbeing and self-efficacy by social prescription. , 2015, Public health.

[18]  P. Camic,et al.  Social prescribing: a review of community referral schemes , 2015 .

[19]  G. Harvey,et al.  Plans to accelerate innovation in health systems are less than IDEAL , 2015, BMJ Quality & Safety.

[20]  F. Davidoff,et al.  SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence) , 2015, Journal of Nursing Care Quality.

[21]  Greg Ogrinc,et al.  Squire 2.0 (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. , 2015, American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

[22]  R. Lillywhite,et al.  Primary-care-based social prescribing for mental health: an analysis of financial and environmental sustainability , 2015, Primary Health Care Research & Development.

[23]  Rhiannon N. Turner,et al.  Effects of a demand-led evidence briefing service on the uptake and use of research evidence by commissioners of health services: protocol for a controlled before and after study , 2015, Implementation Science.

[24]  R. Fitzpatrick,et al.  New approaches to evaluating complex health and care systems , 2016, BMJ : British Medical Journal.