Rapid Climate Change and Society: Assessing Responses and Thresholds

Assessing the social risks associated with climate change requires an understanding of how humans will respond because it affects how well societies will adapt. In the case of rapid or dangerous climate change, of particular interest is the potential for these responses to cross thresholds beyond which they become maladaptive. To explore the possibility of such thresholds, a series of climate change scenarios were presented to U.K. participants whose subjective responses were recorded via interviews and surveyed using Q methodology. The results indicate an initially adaptive response to climate warming followed by a shift to maladaptation as the magnitude of change increases. Beyond this threshold, trust in collective action and institutions was diminished, negatively impacting adaptive capacity. Climate cooling invoked a qualitatively different response, although this may be a product of individuals being primed for warming because it has dominated public discourse. The climate change scenarios used in this research are severe by climatological standards. In reality, the observed responses might occur at a lower rate of change. Whatever the case, analysis of subjectivity has revealed potential for maladaptive human responses, constituting a dangerous or rapid climate threshold within the social sphere.

[1]  S. Schwartz,et al.  A Normative Decision Making Model of Altruism , 1981 .

[2]  M. Pelling,et al.  Understanding adaptation: What can social capital offer assessments of adaptive capacity? , 2005 .

[3]  Simon Batterbury,et al.  The African Sahel 25 years after the great drought: assessing progress and moving towards new agendas and approaches , 2001 .

[4]  Jon A. Krosnick,et al.  Public Attitudes Toward Israel: A Study of the Attentive and Issue Publics , 1995 .

[5]  P. Sabatier,et al.  Liberalism, Environmentalism, and Partisanship in Public Policy-Making , 1981 .

[6]  Salvatore Rizzello,et al.  Subjective Diversity and Social Learning: A Cognitive Perspective for Understanding Institutional Behavior , 2002 .

[7]  Bruce McKeown,et al.  The Forced-Free Distinction in Q Technique: A Note on Unused Categories in the Q Sort Continuum , 1980, Operant Subjectivity.

[8]  T. Carter,et al.  IPCC technical guidelines for assessing climate change impacts and adaptations : part of the IPCC special report to the first session of the conference of the parties to the UN framework convention on climate change , 1994 .

[9]  Picturing climate change , 2002 .

[10]  N. Leary.  A Framework for Benefit-Cost Analysis of Adaptation to Climate Change and Climate Variability , 1999 .

[11]  J. Palutikof,et al.  Public perceptions of unusually warm weather in the UK: impacts, responses and adaptations , 2004 .

[12]  David Uzzell,et al.  THE PSYCHO-SPATIAL DIMENSION OF GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS , 2000 .

[13]  Steven R. Brown.  On The Use of Variance Designs in Q Methodology , 1970 .

[14]  W. Stephenson.  The study of behavior : Q-technique and its methodology , 1955 .

[15]  E. Ostrom,et al.  The Struggle to Govern the Commons , 2003, Science.

[16]  Alan D. Monroe.  Consistency between Public Preferences and National Policy Decisions , 1979 .

[17]  B. O'brien,et al.  Willingness to Pay , 1994, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[18]  G. Gillett.  The Multiple Self , 1987 .

[19]  Stefan Rahmstorf,et al.  The Thermohaline Ocean Circulation: A System with Dangerous Thresholds? , 2000 .

[20]  R. Basher.  Data Requirements for Developing Adaptations to Climate Variability and Change , 1999 .

[21]  Richard A. Wood,et al.  Global Climatic Impacts of a Collapse of the Atlantic Thermohaline Circulation , 2002 .

[22]  W. Adger.  Social and ecological resilience: are they related? , 2000 .

[23]  C. Perrings.  The economics of abrupt climate change , 2003, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[24]  Steven R. Brown.  Political Subjectivity: Applications of Q Methodology in Political Science. , 1980 .

[25]  J. Haughton.  Living with Environmental Change: Social Vulnerability, Adaptation and Resilience in Vietnam: Edited by W. Neil Adger, P. Mick Kelly, and Nguyen Huu Ninh. Routledge, London and New York, 2002. XXI + 314 pp., index, $90.00. , 2004 .

[26]  Richard A. Berk,et al.  Public Perceptions of Climate Change: A 'Willingness to Pay' Assessment , 1998 .

[27]  R. Harré,et al.  The Discursive Mind , 1994 .

[28]  R. K. Dixon,et al.  Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change , 1998 .

[29]  H. Bulkeley.  Common Knowledge? Public Understanding of Climate Change in Newcastle, Australia , 2000 .

[30]  Rajeev Gowda,et al.  Students' Understanding of Climate Change: Insights for Scientists and Educators , 1997 .

[31]  T. Downing,et al.  Societal Vulnerability to Climate Change and Variability , 1999 .

[32]  O. Williamson.  The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead , 2000 .

[33]  Willett Kempton,et al.  Lay perspectives on global climate change1 , 1991 .

[34]  Jon A. Krosnick,et al.  The impact of the fall 1997 debate about global warming on American public opinion , 2000 .

[35]  R. Hardin.  The Street-Level Epistemology of Trust , 1993 .

[36]  Steven R. Brown.  A Primer on Q Methodology , 1993, Operant Subjectivity.

[37]  S. Ungar,et al.  Knowledge, ignorance and the popular culture: climate change versus the ozone hole , 2000 .

[38]  M. Pelling.  Participation, social capital and vulnerability to urban flooding in Guyana , 1998 .

[39]  Wolfgang Cramer,et al.  Climate Impact Response Functions: An Introduction , 2000 .

[40]  N. Stehr.  Trust and climate , 1997 .

[41]  M. Granger Morgan,et al.  Understanding Climatic Impacts, Vulnerabilities, and Adaptation in the United States: Building a Capacity for Assessment , 2003 .

[42]  A. Mazur.  Global Environmental Change in the News , 1998 .

[43]  T. Downing,et al.  Climate change and social vulnerability: Toward a sociology and geography of food insecurity , 1994 .

[44]  Mike Hulme,et al.  Abrupt climate change: can society cope? , 2003, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[45]  W. Adger,et al.  Defining and Experiencing Dangerous Climate Change , 2004 .

[46]  Hanno Hardt,et al.  The Reality of the Mass Media , 2002 .

[47]  J. Overpeck,et al.  Abrupt climate change: Inevitable surprises , 2002 .

[48]  Leonard R. Sussman,et al.  Nominal, Ordinal, Interval, and Ratio Typologies are Misleading , 1993 .

[49]  Richard J.T. Klein,et al.  Adaptation to Climate Variability and Change: Methodological Issues , 1999 .

[50]  T. Dawson,et al.  Modelling natural resource responses to climate change (the MONARCH project): an introduction , 2003 .

[51]  Yvonne Rydin,et al.  Can We Talk Ourselves into Sustainability? The Role of Discourse in the Environmental Policy Process , 1999, Environmental Values.