Mapping of ESA's Climate Change Initiative land cover data to plant functional types for use in the CLASSIC land model

Abstract. Plant functional types (PFTs) are used to represent vegetation distribution in land surface models (LSMs). Previous studies have shown large differences in the geographical distribution of PFTs currently used in various LSMs, which may arise from the differences in the underlying land cover products but also the methods used to map or reclassify land cover data to the PFTs that a given LSM represents. There are large uncertainties associated with existing PFT mapping methods since they are largely based on expert judgement and therefore are subjective. In this study, we propose a new approach to inform the mapping or the cross-walking process using analyses from sub-pixel fractional error matrices, which allows for a quantitative assessment of the fractional composition of the land cover categories in a dataset. We use the Climate Change Initiative (CCI) land cover product produced by the European Space Agency (ESA). Previous work has shown that compared to fine-resolution maps over Canada, the ESA-CCI product provides an improved land cover distribution compared to that from the GLC2000 dataset currently used in the CLASSIC (Canadian Land Surface Scheme Including Biogeochemical Cycles) model. A tree cover fraction dataset and a fine-resolution land cover map over Canada are used to compute the sub-pixel fractional composition of the land cover classes in ESA-CCI, which is then used to create a cross-walking table for mapping the ESA-CCI land cover categories to nine PFTs represented in the CLASSIC model. There are large differences between the new PFT distributions and those currently used in the model. Offline simulations performed with the CLASSIC model using the ESA-CCI-based PFTs show improved winter albedo compared to that based on the GLC2000 dataset. This emphasizes the importance of accurate representation of vegetation distribution for realistic simulation of surface albedo in LSMs. Results in this study suggest that the sub-pixel fractional composition analyses are an effective way to reduce uncertainties in the PFT mapping process and therefore, to some extent, objectify the otherwise subjective process.

[1]  V. Arora,et al.  Towards an ensemble-based evaluation of land surface models in light of uncertain forcings and observations , 2023, Biogeosciences.

[2]  G. Frost,et al.  ABoVE: Tundra Plant Functional Type Continuous-Cover, North Slope, Alaska, 2010-2015 , 2021 .

[3]  J. Melton,et al.  Simulating shrubs and their energy and carbon dioxide fluxes in Canada's Low Arctic with the Canadian Land Surface Scheme Including Biogeochemical Cycles (CLASSIC) , 2021 .

[4]  Libo Wang,et al.  CLASSIC v1.0: the open-source community successor to the Canadian Land Surface Scheme (CLASS) and the Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (CTEM) – Part 2: Global benchmarking , 2021 .

[5]  Libo Wang,et al.  CLASSIC v1.0: the open-source community successor to the Canadian Land Surface Scheme (CLASS) and the Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (CTEM) – Part 2: Global Benchmarking , 2020 .

[6]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Global Carbon Budget 2020 , 2020, Earth System Science Data.

[7]  E. Chan,et al.  CLASSIC v1.0: the open-source community successor to the Canadian Land Surface Scheme (CLASS) and the Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (CTEM) – Part 1: Model framework and site-level performance , 2019, Geoscientific Model Development.

[8]  Pierre Defourny,et al.  Comparison and Assessment of Regional and Global Land Cover Datasets for Use in CLASS over Canada , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[9]  Katrin M. Meyer,et al.  Trait-based modelling in ecology: A review of two decades of research , 2019, Ecological Modelling.

[10]  N. Gillett,et al.  The Canadian Earth System Model version 5 (CanESM5.0.3) , 2019, Geoscientific Model Development.

[11]  Goran Georgievski,et al.  Characterizing uncertainties in the ESA-CCI land cover map of the epoch 2010 and their impacts on MPI-ESM climate simulations , 2018, Theoretical and Applied Climatology.

[12]  Anne D. Bjorkman,et al.  Plant functional trait change across a warming tundra biome , 2018, Nature.

[13]  D. Beerling,et al.  Climatic Controls on C4 Grassland Distributions During the Neogene: A Model-Data Comparison , 2018, Front. Ecol. Evol..

[14]  Ming Xiao,et al.  Mapping of Plant Functional Type from Satellite-Derived Land Cover Datasets for Climate Models , 2018, IGARSS 2018 - 2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[15]  J. Pomeroy,et al.  Modeling the Snowpack Energy Balance during Melt under Exposed Crop Stubble , 2018, Journal of Hydrometeorology.

[16]  Joanne C. White,et al.  Disturbance-Informed Annual Land Cover Classification Maps of Canada's Forested Ecosystems for a 29-Year Landsat Time Series , 2018 .

[17]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  Vegetation demographics in Earth System Models: A review of progress and priorities , 2018, Global change biology.

[18]  Natasha MacBean,et al.  Uncertainty in plant functional type distributions and its impact on land surface models , 2017 .

[19]  Rasim Latifovic,et al.  Circa 2010 Land Cover of Canada: Local Optimization Methodology and Product Development , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[20]  T. Hengl,et al.  Mapping the global depth to bedrock for land surface modeling , 2017 .

[21]  Marvin N. Wright,et al.  SoilGrids250m: Global gridded soil information based on machine learning , 2017, PloS one.

[22]  Nandin-Erdene Tsendbazar,et al.  Comparative assessment of thematic accuracy of GLC maps for specific applications using existing reference data , 2016, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[23]  D. Verseghy,et al.  Investigating the spread in surface albedo for snow‐covered forests in CMIP5 models , 2015 .

[24]  R. Betts,et al.  Plant functional type classification for earth system models: results from the European Space Agency's Land Cover Climate Change Initiative , 2015 .

[25]  D. Verseghy,et al.  Modified treatment of intercepted snow improves the simulated forest albedo in the Canadian Land Surface Scheme , 2015 .

[26]  Joe R. Melton,et al.  Competition between plant functional types in the Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (CTEM) v. 2.0 , 2015 .

[27]  Alexandre Langlois,et al.  Application of Satellite Data for Evaluating the Cold Climate Performance of the Canadian Regional Climate Model over Québec, Canada , 2014 .

[28]  StinsonG.,et al.  Mapping attributes of Canada’s forests at moderate resolution through kNN and MODIS imagery , 2014 .

[29]  B. Poulter,et al.  Use of various remote sensing land cover products for plant functional type mapping over Siberia , 2013 .

[30]  C. Justice,et al.  High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change , 2013, Science.

[31]  Simon Scheiter,et al.  Next-generation dynamic global vegetation models: learning from community ecology. , 2013, The New phytologist.

[32]  A. Ducharne,et al.  The impact of global land-cover change on the terrestrial water cycle , 2013 .

[33]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Lidar plots — a new large-area data collection option: context, concepts, and case study , 2012 .

[34]  Niklaus E. Zimmermann,et al.  Plant functional type mapping for earth system models , 2011 .

[35]  Steffen Fritz,et al.  Highlighting continued uncertainty in global land cover maps for the user community , 2011 .

[36]  M. Herold,et al.  Revisiting land cover observation to address the needs of the climate modeling community , 2011 .

[37]  Vivek K. Arora,et al.  Uncertainties in the 20th century carbon budget associated with land use change , 2010 .

[38]  M. Hansen,et al.  Quantification of global gross forest cover loss , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  Vivek K. Arora,et al.  The Effect of Terrestrial Photosynthesis Down Regulation on the Twentieth-Century Carbon Budget Simulated with the CCCma Earth System Model , 2009 .

[40]  Joanne C. White,et al.  The role of LiDAR in sustainable forest management , 2008 .

[41]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  Representation of vegetation dynamics in the modelling of terrestrial ecosystems: comparing two contrasting approaches within European climate space , 2008 .

[42]  Martin Herold,et al.  Some challenges in global land cover mapping : An assessment of agreement and accuracy in existing 1 km datasets , 2008 .

[43]  Hongliang Fang,et al.  Mapping plant functional types from MODIS data using multisource evidential reasoning , 2008 .

[44]  Steven Platnick,et al.  Northern Hemisphere five-year average (2000-2004) spectral albedos of surfaces in the presence of snow: Statistics computed from Terra MODIS land products , 2007 .

[45]  D. Verseghy,et al.  Class—A Canadian land surface scheme for GCMS. I. Soil model , 2007 .

[46]  D. Verseghy,et al.  Modified snow algorithms in the Canadian land surface scheme: Model runs and sensitivity analysis at three boreal forest stands , 2006 .

[47]  Vivek K. Arora,et al.  Estimating changes in global vegetation cover (1850–2100) for use in climate models , 2006 .

[48]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  Validation of the global land cover 2000 map , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[49]  Laura Chasmer,et al.  Towards a universal lidar canopy height indicator , 2006 .

[50]  A. Belward,et al.  GLC2000: a new approach to global land cover mapping from Earth observation data , 2005 .

[51]  M. Gillis,et al.  Monitoring Canada's forests: The National Forest Inventory , 2005 .

[52]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  A dynamic global vegetation model for studies of the coupled atmosphere‐biosphere system , 2005 .

[53]  Vivek K. Arora,et al.  A parameterization of leaf phenology for the terrestrial ecosystem component of climate models , 2005 .

[54]  Rasim Latifovic,et al.  Accuracy assessment using sub-pixel fractional error matrices of global land cover products derived from satellite data , 2004 .

[55]  K. Oleson,et al.  A dynamic global vegetation model for use with climate models: concepts and description of simulated vegetation dynamics , 2003 .

[56]  R. DeFries,et al.  Global distribution of C3 and C4 vegetation: Carbon cycle implications , 2003 .

[57]  N. C. Strugnell,et al.  First operational BRDF, albedo nadir reflectance products from MODIS , 2002 .

[58]  J. Townshend,et al.  Towards an operational MODIS continuous field of percent tree cover algorithm: examples using AVHRR and MODIS data , 2002 .

[59]  Keith W. Oleson,et al.  Landscapes as patches of plant functional types: An integrating concept for climate and ecosystem models , 2002 .

[60]  J. Thornes.  “Urban meteorology and air quality”. Meeting 21st March 2001, University of Birmingham , 2001 .

[61]  R. Betts,et al.  Biogeophysical impacts of land use on present‐day climate: near‐surface temperature change and radiative forcing , 2001 .

[62]  Roger A. Pielke,et al.  Interactions between the atmosphere and terrestrial ecosystems: influence on weather and climate , 1998 .

[63]  D. Verseghy,et al.  CLASS-A Canadian Land Surface Scheme for GCMs , 1993 .

[64]  D. Gray,et al.  The Prairie Blowing Snow Model: characteristics, validation, operation , 1993 .

[65]  A. Belward,et al.  GLC 2000 : a new approach to global land cover mapping from Earth observation data , 2005 .

[66]  EK VIV,et al.  A parameterization of leaf phenology for the terrestrial ecosystem component of climate models , 2004 .

[67]  R. O G E,et al.  Interactions between the atmosphere and terrestrial ecosystems : influence on weather and climate , 1998 .

[68]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  Plant functional types : their relevance to ecosystem properties and global change , 1998 .