Word Recognition in Continuous and Interrupted Broadband Noise by Young Normal‐Hearing, Older Normal‐Hearing, and Presbyacusic Listeners

Objective: Word recognition performance in continuous and interrupted broadband noise was examined in young normal‐hearing (YNH), older normal‐hearing (ONH), and presbyacusic (older hearing‐impaired [OHI]) listeners. Design: Participants (N = 36) were presented with identical Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 stimuli at 30 dB sensation level re their respective speech reception thresholds. The speech stimuli were presented in quiet and in both competing noise conditions with signal to noise ratios(S/Ns) of 10, 5, 0, ‐5, ‐10, ‐15, and ‐20 dB. Results: In general performance was superior in quiet, improved with increasing S/N, and was greater in the interrupted broadband noise than in the continuous broadband noise. Significant main effects of group and S/N were found in both competing noises (p < 0.0001). Post hoc pairwise comparisons revealed all groups performed differently, with superior performance being displayed by the YNH group followed by the ONH and OHI groups, respectively (p < 0.05). A significant group by S/N interaction was observed in only the interrupted noise condition (p= 0.019). The degree of change in word recognition performance as a function of S/N was greatest in the OHI group followed by the ONH group and the YNH group. Conclusions: Group effects observed in the interrupted noise would imply that the two older groups of listeners had an auditory temporal deficit relative to the YNH listeners. The paradigm reveals the patency of the temporal processes that are responsible for the perceptual advantage (i.e., a release from masking) a listener has in interrupted competing stimulus.

[1]  P W Alberti,et al.  Auditory detection, discrimination and speech processing in ageing, noise-sensitive and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1990, Scandinavian audiology.

[2]  Punch Jl Masking of spondees by interrupted noise in hearing-impaired listeners. , 1978 .

[3]  Wouter A. Dreschler,et al.  Relations between psychophysical data and speech perception for hearing‐impaired subjects. II , 1980 .

[4]  B C Moore,et al.  Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  C. J. Hardiman,et al.  Central auditory processing in normal-hearing elderly adults. , 1990, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[6]  R. Plomp Auditory handicap of hearing impairment and the limited benefit of hearing aids , 1977 .

[7]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Age effects on measures of auditory duration discrimination. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[8]  Q Summerfield,et al.  Psychoacoustic and phonetic temporal processing in normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  S. Gordon-Salant Age-related differences in speech recognition performance as a function of test format and paradigm. , 1987, Ear and hearing.

[10]  J. Dubno,et al.  Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  P E Souza,et al.  Masking of speech in young and elderly listeners with hearing loss. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[12]  J L Cranford,et al.  Precedence effect and speech understanding in elderly listeners. , 1992, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[13]  S. Gelfand,et al.  Future Perspectives in Hearing and Aging: Clinical and Research Needs , 1985 .

[14]  W F Rintelmann,et al.  Articulation functions and test-retest performance of normal-hearing children on three speech discrimination tests: WIPI, PBK-50, and NV Auditory Test No. 6. , 1976, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[15]  J M Festen Contributions of comodulation masking release and temporal resolution to the speech-reception threshold masked by an interfering voice. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  K Schorn,et al.  Temporal resolution in hard-of-hearing patients. , 1982, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[17]  Charles Lewis,et al.  Partial Omega Squared for Anova Designs , 1979 .

[18]  J. C. Steinberg,et al.  Factors Governing the Intelligibility of Speech Sounds , 1945 .

[19]  Comodulation masking release for elderly listeners with relatively normal audiograms. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  N. Viemeister,et al.  Temporal modulation transfer functions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1985, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[21]  G. Studebaker A "rationalized" arcsine transform. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[22]  Irwin Pollack,et al.  Effects of High Pass and Low Pass Filtering on the Intelligibility of Speech in Noise , 1948 .

[23]  Phillips Dp,et al.  Impaired Word Recognition in Noise by Patients with Noise-Induced Cochlear Hearing-Loss - Contribution of Temporal Resolution Defect , 1994 .

[24]  L. Humes,et al.  Speech-recognition difficulties of the hearing-impaired elderly: the contributions of audibility. , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[25]  M. Lutman Degradations in frequency and temporal resolution with age and their impact on speech identification. , 1990, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[26]  D P Phillips,et al.  Auditory temporal resolution in multiple sclerosis. , 1994, The Journal of otolaryngology.

[27]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Auditory duration discrimination in young and elderly listeners with normal hearing. , 1994, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[28]  D D Dirks,et al.  Speech recognition in amplitude-modulated noise of listeners with normal and listeners with impaired hearing. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[29]  R Plomp,et al.  A model for the speech-reception threshold in noise without and with a hearing aid. , 1982, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.

[30]  L E Humes,et al.  Auditory filter shapes in normal-hearing, noise-masked normal, and elderly listeners. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  James P. Egan,et al.  On the Intelligibility of Bands of Speech in Noise , 1946 .

[32]  J L Cranford,et al.  Effects of aging on the precedence effect in sound localization. , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[33]  S. Bacon,et al.  Modulation detection in subjects with relatively flat hearing losses. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[34]  S E Trehub,et al.  Aging and auditory temporal sequencing: Ordering the elements of repeating tone patterns , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[35]  R L Freyman,et al.  Temporal resolution in sensorineural hearing-impaired listeners. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  Omission rates of young and elderly listeners in word recognition testing. , 1993, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[37]  H J Simon,et al.  Perception of temporal differences in speech by "normal-hearing" adults: effects of age and intensity. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  R. P. Gang The effects of age on the diagnostic utility of the rollover phenomenon. , 1976, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[39]  Speech recognition thresholds in temporally complex backgrounds: Effects of hearing loss and noise masking , 1994 .

[40]  R. H. Wilson,et al.  Influence of pulsed masking on the threshold for spondees. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[41]  S Gatehouse,et al.  Frequency resolution as a function of hearing threshold level and age. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  R. Plomp,et al.  Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  B C Moore,et al.  Dynamic range and asymmetry of the auditory filter. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  P Bonding Frequency selectivity and speech discrimination in sensorineural hearing loss. , 1979, Scandinavian audiology.

[45]  R. Patterson,et al.  The deterioration of hearing with age: frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram, and speech threshold. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[46]  B C Moore,et al.  Auditory filter shapes at low center frequencies in young and elderly hearing-impaired subjects. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[47]  B. Moore,et al.  Detection of temporal gaps in sinusoids by elderly subjects with and without hearing loss. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[48]  C. Newman,et al.  Prolonged auditory processing time in the elderly: evidence from a backward recognition-masking paradigm. , 1983, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[49]  Age-associated degeneration of backward masking task performance: evidence of declining temporal resolution abilities in normal listeners. , 1993, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[50]  C W Turner,et al.  Use of temporal envelope cues in speech recognition by normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[51]  R. Plomp,et al.  Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. III. Additional data and final discussion , 1992 .

[52]  D A Nelson,et al.  High-level psychophysical tuning curves: forward masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[53]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[54]  D P Phillips,et al.  Word recognition performance in continuous and interrupted broad-band noise by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners. , 1995, The American journal of otology.

[55]  R Plomp,et al.  Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. I: Development of test battery. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[56]  R Plomp,et al.  Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. II: Multivariate analyses. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[57]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Temporal factors and speech recognition performance in young and elderly listeners. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[58]  J M Festen,et al.  Relations between auditory functions in normal hearing. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[59]  S. Gelfand,et al.  Consonant recognition in quiet and in noise with aging among normal hearing listeners. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[60]  S P Bacon,et al.  Modulation detection, modulation masking, and speech understanding in noise in the elderly. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[61]  A. M. Mimpen,et al.  Speech-reception threshold for sentences as a function of age and noise level. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[62]  S. Gelfand,et al.  Consonant recognition in quiet as a function of aging among normal hearing subjects. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[63]  R. Plomp A signal-to-noise ratio model for the speech-reception threshold of the hearing impaired. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.