Digital Modeling for Bioarchaeologists

ABSTRACT The creation of digital repositories of human skeletal remains offers bioarchaeologists a variety of potential means of aiding efforts related to curation and analysis. We present a discussion of how issues of preservation and access can affect research and argue that digital repositories not only maintain a record of objects but that the digital format allows researchers to expand their studies to include otherwise inaccessible collections. Digital models can be utilized by bioarchaeologists to collect and analyze a wide variety of quantitative and qualitative data. We review several digital capture methods employed by bioarchaeologists, including CT scanning, laser scanning, and photogrammetry. While photogrammetry is underutilized by bioarchaeologists, we point out its many advantages over other methods. La creación de repositorios digitales de restos óseos humanos ofrece una variedad de medios potenciales para auxiliar a los bioarqueólogos en esfuerzos relacionados con la curación y el análisis. Presentamos una discusión sobre cómo las investigaciones pueden verse afectadas por problemas de preservación y acceso, y argumentamos que los repositorios digitales no solo mantienen un registro de objetos, sino que el formato digital permite a los investigadores ampliar sus estudios para incluir colecciones inaccesibles. Los bioarqueólogos pueden utilizar los modelos digitales para recopilar y analizar una amplia variedad de datos cuantitativos y cualitativos. Revisamos varios métodos de captura digital empleados por los bioarqueólogos, incluidos la tomografía computarizada, la exploración láser y la fotogrametría. La fotogrametría está actualmente infrautilizada por los bioarqueólogos, y abogamos por su uso mediante la identificación de ventajas relacionadas con su costo, eficiencia y capacidad para proporcionar texturas de superficie.

[1]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology , 1999 .

[2]  J. Hefner The macromorphoscopic databank. , 2018, American journal of physical anthropology.

[3]  G. Larson,et al.  The use of close-range photogrammetry in zooarchaeology: Creating accurate 3D models of wolf crania to study dog domestication , 2016 .

[4]  Tim Gernat,et al.  Virtual skeletons: using a structured light scanner to create a 3D faunal comparative collection , 2009 .

[5]  Dennis E. Slice,et al.  Modern Morphometrics In Physical Anthropology , 2005 .

[6]  Thomas Evan Digital Archaeology: Bridging Method and Theory , 2004 .

[7]  David Katz,et al.  Technical note: 3D from standard digital photography of human crania-a preliminary assessment. , 2014, American journal of physical anthropology.

[8]  M. Pilloud,et al.  Cranial Nonmetric and Morphoscopic Data Sets , 2016 .

[9]  Susan C. Kuzminsky,et al.  Three-dimensional laser scanning: potential uses for museum conservation and scientific research , 2012 .

[10]  Maurizio Forte,et al.  Revisiting reflexive archaeology at Çatalhöyük: integrating digital and 3D technologies at the trowel's edge , 2015, Antiquity.

[11]  Susan C. Kuzminsky,et al.  The application of 3D geometric morphometrics and laser surface scanning to investigate the standardization of cranial vault modification in the Andes , 2016 .

[12]  D. Ubelaker,et al.  Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal Remains , 1994 .

[13]  P. Gunz,et al.  Semilandmarks: a method for quantifying curves and surfaces , 2013 .

[14]  Vera Weisbecker,et al.  Sharing is caring? Measurement error and the issues arising from combining 3D morphometric datasets , 2017, Ecology and evolution.

[15]  Jesús Marugán-Lobón,et al.  Open data and digital morphology , 2017, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  Anna C. Novotny Implementing Photogrammetry in Three Bioarchaeological Contexts: Steps for In-Field Documentation , 2019, Advances in Archaeological Practice.

[17]  Erin L. Thompson,et al.  Legal and Ethical Considerations for Digital Recreations of Cultural Heritage , 2017 .

[18]  Brenna R. Hassett,et al.  Which Bone to Pick: Creation, Curation, and Dissemination of Online 3D Digital Bioarchaeological Data , 2018, Archaeologies.

[19]  C. Roberts,et al.  Study and restudy of curated skeletal collections in bioarchaeology: A perspective on the UK and the implications for future curation of human remains , 2011 .

[20]  Dennis E. Slice,et al.  A Landmark-Free Method for Three-Dimensional Shape Analysis , 2016, PloS one.

[21]  G. Wrobel The bioarchaeology of space and place: Ideology, power, and meaning in Maya mortuary contexts , 2014 .

[22]  Priscilla Ulguim,et al.  Models and Metadata: The Ethics of Sharing Bioarchaeological 3D Models Online , 2018, Archaeologies.

[23]  B. Hassett The Ethical Challenge of Digital Bioarchaeological Data , 2018, Archaeologies.