Digital libraries: situating use in changing information infrastructure

How users meet infrastructure is a key practical, methodological challenge for digital library design. This article presents research conducted by the Social Science Team of the federally funded Digital Libraries Initiative (DLI) project at the University of Illinois. Data were collected from potential and actual users of the DLI testbed—containing the full text of journal articles—through focus groups, interviews and observations, usability testing, user registration and transaction logging, and user surveys. Basic results on nature and extent of testbed use are presented, followed by a discussion of three analytical foci relating to digital library use as a process of assemblage: document disaggregation and reaggregation; information convergence; and the manner in which users confront new genres and technical barriers in information systems. The article also highlights several important methodological and conceptual issues that frame research on social aspects of digital library use.

[1]  Hubert L. Dreyfus,et al.  Mind over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer , 1987, IEEE Expert.

[2]  Andrew Monk,et al.  Improving Your Human-Computer Interface: A Practical Technique , 1993 .

[3]  Joost Kircz,et al.  Modularity: the next form of scientific information presentation? , 1998, J. Documentation.

[4]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[5]  Frances F. Jacobson,et al.  Teaching Reflection: Information Seeking and Evaluation in a Digital Library Environment , 1997, Libr. Trends.

[6]  James Frew,et al.  User Evaluation: Summary of the Methodologies and Results for the Alexandria Digital Library, University of California at Santa Barbara , 1997 .

[7]  Bruce R. Schatz,et al.  Automatic subject indexing using an associative neural network , 1998, DL '98.

[8]  Alan Cooper,et al.  About Face: The Essentials of User Interface Design , 1995 .

[9]  Andrew Dillon,et al.  The Role of genre in shaping our understanding of digital documents , 1998 .

[10]  William E. Landis,et al.  Redefining access to scholarly journals: A progress report on JSTOR , 1997 .

[11]  L. Stewart.  User Acceptance of Electronic Journals: Interviews with Chemists at Cornell University , 1996 .

[12]  S. L. Star,et al.  Social informatics of digital library use and infrastructure , 1996 .

[13]  Nancy A. Van House,et al.  Understanding complex information environments: a social analysis of watershed planning , 1997, DL '97.

[14]  William H. Mischo,et al.  Federated Search of Scientific Literature , 1999, Computer.

[15]  S. L. Star.  Triangulating Clinical and Basic Research: British Localizationists, 1870–1906 , 1986, History of science; an annual review of literature, research and teaching.

[16]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Information Seeking in Electronic Environments , 1995 .

[17]  Christine L. Borgman.  From Gutenberg to the Global Information Infrastructure , 2000 .

[18]  Sanford Berman.  Subject Cataloging: Critiques and Innovations , 1985 .

[19]  Stuart Weibel,et al.  Testing a digital library: user response to the CORE project , 1997 .

[20]  Bruce Tognazzini,et al.  Tog on Interface , 1992 .

[21]  Bertram C. Bruce,et al.  The Disappearance of Technology: Toward an Ecological Model of Literacy , 1998 .

[22]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences , 1999 .

[23]  Ann Peterson Bishop,et al.  Document Structure and Digital Libraries: How Researchers Mobilize Information in Journal Articles , 1999, Inf. Process. Manag..

[24]  Andrew Dillon,et al.  Designing Usable Electronic Text: Ergonomic Aspects Of Human Information Usage , 1994 .

[25]  Martin Kurth,et al.  The limits and limitations of transaction log analysis , 1993 .

[26]  Rob Kling,et al.  Organizational dimensions of effective digital library use: closed rational and open natural systems models , 1996 .

[27]  Ann Peterson Bishop,et al.  Making digital libraries go: comparing use across genres , 1999, DL '99.

[28]  William H. Mischo,et al.  Federating Diverse Collections of Scientific Literature , 1996, Computer.

[29]  David M. Levy,et al.  I read the news today, oh boy: reading and attention in digital libraries , 1997, DL '97.

[30]  G. Bateson,et al.  Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity , 1979 .

[31]  S. L. Star,et al.  Making Infrastructure: The Dream of a Common Language , 1996 .

[32]  J. F. B. Rowland,et al.  Project ELVYN : an experiment in electronic journal delivery, facts, figures and findings , 1995 .

[33]  Helen Watson-Verran,et al.  6 Science and Other Indigenous Knowledge Systems , 1995 .

[34]  F. W. Lancaster,et al.  The measurement and evaluation of library services , 1977 .

[35]  Carol L. Barry.  Document representations and clues to document relevance , 1998 .

[36]  Catherine C. Marshall,et al.  Making metadata: a study of metadata creation for a mixed physical-digital collection , 1998, DL '98.

[37]  F. Wilfrid Lancaster,et al.  If you want to evaluate your library , 1988 .

[38]  Karen Ruhleder,et al.  Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[39]  David M. Nichols,et al.  Browsing is a collaborative process , 1997, Inf. Process. Manag..

[40]  Nancy A. Van House,et al.  Cooperative knowledge work and practices of trust: sharing environmental planning data sets , 1998, CSCW '98.

[41]  Laura J. Neumann,et al.  Trial and Error as a Learning Strategy in System Use , 1998 .

[42]  Ann Peterson Bishop,et al.  Digital libraries and knowledge disaggregation: the use of journal article components , 1998, DL '98.