Canonical or noncanonical? Structural plasticity of serine protease‐binding loops in Kunitz‐STI protease inhibitors

The Kunitz‐Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor (Kunitz‐STI) family is a large family of proteins with most of its members being protease inhibitors. The versatility of the inhibitory profile and the structural plasticity of these proteins, make this family a promising scaffold for designing new multifunctional proteins. Historically, Kunitz‐STI inhibitors have been classified as canonical serine protease inhibitors, but new inhibitors with novel inhibition mechanisms have been described in recent years. Different inhibition mechanisms could be the result of different evolutionary pathways. In the present work, we performed a structural analysis of all the crystallographic structures available for Kunitz‐STI inhibitors to characterize serine protease‐binding loop structural features and locations. Our study suggests a relationship between the conformation of serine protease‐binding loops and the inhibition mechanism, their location in the β‐trefoil fold, and the plant source of the inhibitors. The classical canonical inhibitors of this family are restricted to plants from the Fabales order and bind their targets via the β4–β5 loop, whereas serine protease‐binding loops in inhibitors from other plants lie mainly in the β5–β6 and β9–β10 loops. In addition, we found that the β5–β6 loop is used to inhibit two different families of serine proteases through a steric blockade inhibition mechanism. This work will help to change the general perception that all Kunitz‐STI inhibitors are canonical inhibitors and proteins with protease‐binding loops adopting noncanonical conformations are exceptions. Additionally, our results will help in the identification of protease‐binding loops in uncharacterized or newly discovered inhibitors, and in the design of multifunctional proteins.

[1]  M. Blaber Variable and Conserved Regions of Secondary Structure in the β-Trefoil Fold: Structure Versus Function , 2022, Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences.

[2]  D. Hassabis,et al.  AlphaFold Protein Structure Database: massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models , 2021, Nucleic Acids Res..

[3]  Oriol Vinyals,et al.  Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold , 2021, Nature.

[4]  P. Bork,et al.  Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation , 2021, Nucleic Acids Res..

[5]  Silvio C. E. Tosatto,et al.  The InterPro protein families and domains database: 20 years on , 2020, Nucleic Acids Res..

[6]  Silvio C. E. Tosatto,et al.  Pfam: The protein families database in 2021 , 2020, Nucleic Acids Res..

[7]  Amit Kumar,et al.  The structure of MP-4 from Mucuna pruriens at 2.22 Å resolution. , 2020, Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications.

[8]  Y. Peleg,et al.  New homologues of Brassicaceae water‐soluble chlorophyll proteins shed light on chlorophyll binding, spectral tuning, and molecular evolution , 2020, The FEBS journal.

[9]  Liisa Holm,et al.  Benchmarking fold detection by DaliLite v.5 , 2019, Bioinform..

[10]  C. G. Suresh,et al.  Structural insights into the unique inhibitory mechanism of Kunitz type trypsin inhibitor from Cicer arietinum L. , 2018, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[11]  S. Pletnev,et al.  Crystal structure of a novel Kunitz type inhibitor, alocasin with anti-Aedes aegypti activity targeting midgut proteases. , 2018, Pest management science.

[12]  A. Gamble,et al.  Proteases and protease inhibitors in infectious diseases , 2018, Medicinal research reviews.

[13]  James Scott-Brown,et al.  Visualization and analysis of non-covalent contacts using the Protein Contacts Atlas , 2018, Nature structural & molecular biology.

[14]  Neil D. Rawlings,et al.  The MEROPS database of proteolytic enzymes, their substrates and inhibitors in 2017 and a comparison with peptidases in the PANTHER database , 2017, Nucleic Acids Res..

[15]  D. Salunke,et al.  Docking, thermodynamics and molecular dynamics (MD) studies of a non-canonical protease inhibitor, MP-4, from Mucuna pruriens , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[16]  Alicia P. Higueruelo,et al.  Arpeggio: A Web Server for Calculating and Visualising Interatomic Interactions in Protein Structures , 2017, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  T. Pons,et al.  Structures of a bi-functional Kunitz-type STI family inhibitor of serine and aspartic proteases: Could the aspartic protease inhibition have evolved from a canonical serine protease-binding loop? , 2016, Journal of structural biology.

[18]  J. Kos,et al.  Fungal β-trefoil trypsin inhibitors cnispin and cospin demonstrate the plasticity of the β-trefoil fold. , 2014, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[19]  G. Wong,et al.  Paralogous Radiations of PIN Proteins with Multiple Origins of Noncanonical PIN Structure , 2014, Molecular biology and evolution.

[20]  A. Wlodawer,et al.  Crystal Structure of Crataeva tapia Bark Protein (CrataBL) and Its Effect in Human Prostate Cancer Cell Lines , 2013, PloS one.

[21]  A. Wlodawer,et al.  Crystal Structures of a Plant Trypsin Inhibitor from Enterolobium contortisiliquum (EcTI) and of Its Complex with Bovine Trypsin , 2013, PloS one.

[22]  Pravindra Kumar,et al.  Structural basis for dual inhibitory role of tamarind Kunitz inhibitor (TKI) against factor Xa and trypsin , 2012, The FEBS journal.

[23]  D. Turk,et al.  β-Trefoil inhibitors – from the work of Kunitz onward , 2012, Biological chemistry.

[24]  N. Oparina,et al.  Impact of recombination on polymorphism of genes encoding Kunitz-type protease inhibitors in the genus Solanum. , 2012, Biochimie.

[25]  A. Garcia-Pino,et al.  The Plasticity of the β-Trefoil Fold Constitutes an Evolutionary Platform for Protease Inhibition* , 2011, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[26]  Ioannis Xenarios,et al.  T-Coffee: a web server for the multiple sequence alignment of protein and RNA sequences using structural information and homology extension , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[27]  M. Anderson,et al.  Coexpression of potato type I and II proteinase inhibitors gives cotton plants protection against insect damage in the field , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  O. Gascuel,et al.  New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. , 2010, Systematic biology.

[29]  P. Emsley,et al.  Features and development of Coot , 2010, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[30]  J. Kos,et al.  Versatile Loops in Mycocypins Inhibit Three Protease Families* , 2009, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[31]  Yuxing Chen,et al.  The Ternary Structure of the Double-headed Arrowhead Protease Inhibitor API-A Complexed with Two Trypsins Reveals a Novel Reactive Site Conformation* , 2009, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[32]  D. Goldenberg,et al.  Structure of a serine protease poised to resynthesize a peptide bond , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Geoffrey J. Barton,et al.  Jalview Version 2—a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench , 2009, Bioinform..

[34]  Keith Wilson,et al.  Structural and mutational analyses of the interaction between the barley alpha-amylase/subtilisin inhibitor and the subtilisin savinase reveal a novel mode of inhibition. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[35]  J. Teixeira,et al.  Optimized extraction of a lectin from Crataeva tapia bark using AOT in isooctane reversed micelles , 2008 .

[36]  N. Grishin,et al.  PROMALS3D: a tool for multiple protein sequence and structure alignments , 2008, Nucleic acids research.

[37]  B. Turk Targeting proteases: successes, failures and future prospects , 2006, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[38]  J. Dasgupta,et al.  Spacer Asn determines the fate of Kunitz (STI) inhibitors, as revealed by structural and biochemical studies on WCI mutants. , 2006, Biochemistry.

[39]  Thomas J Naughton,et al.  Assessment of methods for amino acid matrix selection and their use on empirical data shows that ad hoc assumptions for choice of matrix are not justified , 2006, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[40]  L. Beltramini,et al.  Kunitz-type Bauhinia bauhinioides inhibitors devoid of disulfide bridges: isolation of the cDNAs, heterologous expression and structural studies , 2005, Biological chemistry.

[41]  K Henrick,et al.  Electronic Reprint Biological Crystallography Secondary-structure Matching (ssm), a New Tool for Fast Protein Structure Alignment in Three Dimensions Biological Crystallography Secondary-structure Matching (ssm), a New Tool for Fast Protein Structure Alignment in Three Dimensions , 2022 .

[42]  Birte Svensson,et al.  Barley α-amylase/subtilisin inhibitor: structure, biophysics and protein engineering , 2004 .

[43]  I. Polikarpov,et al.  Crystal structure of the Kunitz (STI)-type inhibitor from Delonix regia seeds. , 2003, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[44]  J. Otlewski,et al.  Canonical protein inhibitors of serine proteases , 2003, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (CMLS).

[45]  David S. Wishart,et al.  VADAR: a web server for quantitative evaluation of protein structure quality , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[46]  R. Huber,et al.  Characterization of the residues involved in the human alpha-thrombin-haemadin complex: an exosite II-binding inhibitor. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[47]  S. Marangoni,et al.  Primary sequence determination of a Kunitz inhibitor isolated from Delonix regia seeds. , 2001, Phytochemistry.

[48]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[49]  H. Satoh,et al.  Molecular Cloning and Functional Expression of a Water-soluble Chlorophyll Protein, a Putative Carrier of Chlorophyll Molecules in Cauliflower* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[50]  S. Suh,et al.  Kunitz-type soybean trypsin inhibitor revisited: refined structure of its complex with porcine trypsin reveals an insight into the interaction between a homologous inhibitor from Erythrina caffra and tissue-type plasminogen activator. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[51]  H. Kamasaka,et al.  Rice bifunctional alpha-amylase/subtilisin inhibitor: characterization, localization, and changes in developing and germinating seeds. , 1998, Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry.

[52]  R. Huber,et al.  Natural protein proteinase inhibitors and their interaction with proteinases. , 1992, European journal of biochemistry.

[53]  R. Huber,et al.  Refined structure of the hirudin-thrombin complex. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[54]  B. Meloun,et al.  Primary structure of cathepsin D inhibitor from potatoes and its structure relationship to soybean trypsin inhibitor family , 1989, FEBS letters.

[55]  J. Mundy,et al.  Characterization of a bifunctional wheat inhibitor of endogenous α‐amylase and subtilisin , 1984 .

[56]  U. Quast,et al.  Soybean trypsin inhibitor (Kunitz) is doubleheaded. Kinetics of the interaction of alpha-chymotrypsin with each side. , 1981, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[57]  I. Kato,et al.  Protein inhibitors of proteinases. , 1980, Annual review of biochemistry.

[58]  M. Fujii,et al.  Isolation and some properties of a subtilisin inhibitor from barley. , 1976, Journal of biochemistry.

[59]  A. Berger,et al.  On the size of the active site in proteases. I. Papain. , 1967, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.