Multiple causes of sexual segregation in European red deer: enlightenments from varying breeding phenology at high and low latitude

Sexual segregation outside the mating season occurs in most species of sexually dimorphic ungulates and has been extensively described in the literature, but the mechanisms causing segregation are still debated. The detailed pattern of sexual segregation throughout the year has rarely been presented for mammals, and no study, to our knowledge, has used latitudinal–related variation in breeding phenology to shed light on the underlying mechanisms. Recent methodological developments have made it possible to quantify separate components of segregation (social, habitat) and activity synchrony in animal groups, but these major improvements have so far been little used. We observed European red deer year round at two widely different latitudes (France and Norway) and tested three different mechanistic hypotheses of segregation related to: (i) predation risk; (ii) body–size–related forage selection; and (iii) activity budget. Habitat segregation peaked during calving in both populations and dropped rapidly after calving. Females with calves were more segregated from males than were females without calves, pointing to a key role of anti–predator behaviour even though large predators are absent in France and extremely rare in Norway. However, at both sites individuals also grouped with their own sex within habitat types (i.e. social segregation), and individuals in mixed–sex groups were less synchronized in activity type than individuals in either unisex male or unisex female groups, suggesting that differences in activity budgets are involved. Social segregation peaked during calving and was lowest during the rut (indicating aggregation) in both populations; these activities occurred one month later in the Northern populations, corresponding well with known differences in breeding phenology. We conclude that latitude–dependent breeding phenology shapes the seasonal pattern of sexual segregation and that sexual segregation in ungulates has multiple causes.

[1]  Atle Mysterud,et al.  Timing and Synchrony of Ovulation in Red Deer Constrained by Short Northern Summers , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[2]  M. Festa‐Bianchet,et al.  Seasonal range selection in bighorn sheep: conflicts between forage quality, forage quantity, and predator avoidance , 1988, Oecologia.

[3]  J. Edwards Diet shifts in moose due to predator avoidance , 1983, Oecologia.

[4]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Sex‐ and age‐dependent effects of population density on life history traits of red deer Cervus elaphus in a temperate forest , 2002 .

[5]  Atle Mysterud,et al.  Large‐scale habitat variability, delayed density effects and red deer populations in Norway , 2002 .

[6]  K. M. Stewart,et al.  Assessing Sexual Segregation in Deer , 2002 .

[7]  K. Ruckstuhl,et al.  Sexual segregation in ungulates: a comparative test of three hypotheses , 2002, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[8]  R. Bon,et al.  Segregation is not only a matter of sex in Alpine ibex, Capra ibex ibex , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Could the indirect competition hypothesis explain inter‐sexual site segregation in red deer (Cervus elaphus L.)? , 2001 .

[10]  A. Mysterud,et al.  Effects of age, sex and density on body weight of Norwegian red deer: evidence of density–dependent senescence , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  T. J. Roper,et al.  Activity synchrony and social cohesion: a fission-fusion model , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  A. Mysterud The relationship between ecological segregation and sexual body size dimorphism in large herbivores , 2000, Oecologia.

[13]  J. Wilmshurst,et al.  The allometry of patch selection in ruminants , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  K. Ruckstuhl,et al.  SEXUAL SEGREGATION IN UNGULATES: A NEW APPROACH , 2000 .

[15]  J. Kie,et al.  Birth-Site Selection by Alaskan Moose: Maternal Strategies for Coping with a Risky Environment , 1999 .

[16]  L. Conradt Social segregation is not a consequence of habitat segregation in red deer and feral soay sheep , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  T. H. Clutton-Brock,et al.  Habitat segregation in ungulates: are males forced into suboptimal foraging habitats through indirect competition by females? , 1999, Oecologia.

[18]  Ruckstuhl TO SYNCHRONISE OR NOT TO SYNCHRONISE: A DILEMMA FOR YOUNG BIGHORN MALES? , 1999 .

[19]  J. Swenson,et al.  Geographic expansion of an increasing brown bear population: evidence for presaturation dispersal , 1998 .

[20]  L. Conradt,et al.  Could asynchrony in activity between the sexes cause intersexual social segregation in ruminants? , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  K. Ruckstuhl,et al.  Foraging behaviour and sexual segregation in bighorn sheep , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[22]  L. Conradt Measuring the degree of sexual segregation in group‐living animals , 1998 .

[23]  J. Gerard,et al.  An example of segregation between age and sex classes only weakly related to habitat use in mouflon sheep (Ovis gmelini) , 1998 .

[24]  U. Breitenmoser Large predators in the Alps: The fall and rise of man's competitors , 1998 .

[25]  J. Byers American Pronghorn: Social Adaptations and the Ghosts of Predators Past , 1998 .

[26]  R. Bon,et al.  Sexual Segregation of Habitat by the Alpine Ibex in the French Alps , 1997 .

[27]  Steeve D. Côté,et al.  Time budgets and synchrony of activities in muskoxen: the influence of sex, age, and season , 1997 .

[28]  J. Wehausen,et al.  Sexual Segregation in Mountain Sheep: Resources or Predation? , 1997 .

[29]  B. Ripley,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics with S-Plus. , 1996 .

[30]  R. Bon,et al.  Unexplained sexual segregation in polygamous ungulates: a defense of an ontogenetic approach , 1996, Behavioural Processes.

[31]  M. Main,et al.  Sexual segregation in Rocky Mountain mule deer , 1996 .

[32]  F. Weckerly,et al.  Sexual Segregation in Ungulates: New Directions for Research , 1996 .

[33]  John G. Kie,et al.  Sexual segregation in black-tailed deer : effects of scale , 1996 .

[34]  J. Swenson,et al.  The near extinction and recovery of brown bears in Scandinavia in relation to the bear management policies of Norway and Sweden , 1995, Wildlife Biology.

[35]  J. Carranza,et al.  Experimental shifting from harem defence to territoriality in rutting red deer , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[36]  Du Toit Sexual segregation in kudu : sex differences in competitive ability, predation risk or nutritional needs? , 1995 .

[37]  Seasonal variation in group size of Cantabrian chamois in relation to escape terrain and food , 1994 .

[38]  F. Messier,et al.  Group structure in wood bison: nutritional and reproductive determinants , 1993 .

[39]  S. Albon,et al.  Plant phenology and the benefits of migration in a temperate ungulate , 1992 .

[40]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Red Deer: Behavior and Ecology of Two Sexes , 1992 .

[41]  J. Berger,et al.  Pregnancy incentives, predation constraints and habitat shifts: experimental and field evidence for wild bighorn sheep , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[42]  F. Bronson,et al.  Mammalian Reproductive Biology , 1990 .

[43]  I. Gordon,et al.  Variation in foraging behaviour in red deer and the consequences for population demography , 1990 .

[44]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Mammalian mating systems. , 1989, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[45]  I. Gordon,et al.  The allometry of food intake in grazing ruminants , 1987 .

[46]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Sexual segregation and density-related changes in habitat use in male and female Red deer (Cerrus elaphus) , 1987 .

[47]  Montague W. Demment,et al.  A Nutritional Explanation for Body-Size Patterns of Ruminant and Nonruminant Herbivores , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[48]  C. Shank Inter- and intra-sexual segregation of chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra) by altitude and habitat during summer , 1985 .

[49]  P. Fennessy Red deer—behaviour and ecology of two sexes , 1984 .

[50]  R. Terry Bowyer,et al.  Sexual Segregation in Southern Mule Deer , 1984 .

[51]  A. Rutberg Birth Synchrony in American Bison (Bison bison): Response to Predation or Season? , 1984 .

[52]  A. T. Bergerud,et al.  Antipredator tactics of calving caribou: dispersion in mountains , 1984 .

[53]  Charles T. Robbins,et al.  Wildlife Feeding and Nutrition , 1984 .

[54]  T. Parish,et al.  DIFFERENCES IN THE QUALITY OF FOOD EATEN BY RED DEER (CERVUS ELAPHUS) STAGS AND HINDS IN WINTER , 1982 .

[55]  D. McCullough,et al.  The George Reserve deer herd : population ecology of a K-selected species , 1980 .

[56]  S. Emlen,et al.  Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. , 1977, Science.

[57]  V. Geist On the Relationship of Social Evolution and Ecology in Ungulates , 1974 .

[58]  P. Jarman,et al.  The Social Organisation of Antelope in Relation To Their Ecology , 1974 .

[59]  R. Bell A grazing ecosystem in the Serengeti , 1971 .

[60]  R. Greenberg Biometry , 1969, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[61]  R. Sadleir The Ecology of Reproduction in Wild and Domestic Mammals , 1969, Springer Netherlands.

[62]  H. L. Short Rumen fermentations and energy relationships in white-tailed deer. , 1963 .