Locally Low-Rank tensor regularization for high-resolution quantitative dynamic MRI

Quantitative dynamic MRI acquisitions have the potential to diagnose diffuse diseases in conjunction with functional abnormalities. However, their resolutions are limited due to the long acquisition time. Such datasets are multi-dimensional, exhibiting interactions between ≥ 4 dimensions, which cannot be easily identified using sparsity or low-rank matrix methods. Hence, low-rank tensors are a natural fit to model such data. But in the presence of multitude of different tissue types in the field-of-view, it is difficult to find an appropriate value of tensor rank, which avoids under-or over-regularization. In this work, we propose a locally low-rank tensor regularization approach to enable high-resolution quantitative dynamic MRI. We show this approach successfully enables dynamic Ti mapping at high spatio-temporal resolutions.

[1]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  Mehmet Akçakaya,et al.  Low-Rank Tensor Regularization for Improved Dynamic Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2016 .

[3]  P. Boesiger,et al.  SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  D. Donoho,et al.  Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  K. T. Block,et al.  Undersampled radial MRI with multiple coils. Iterative image reconstruction using a total variation constraint , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Tamara G. Kolda,et al.  Tensor Decompositions and Applications , 2009, SIAM Rev..

[7]  Mathews Jacob,et al.  Accelerated Dynamic MRI Exploiting Sparsity and Low-Rank Structure: k-t SLR , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  R. Bro PARAFAC. Tutorial and applications , 1997 .

[9]  Justin P. Haldar,et al.  Low-rank approximations for dynamic imaging , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[10]  Mehmet Akçakaya,et al.  Temporally resolved parametric assessment of Z‐magnetization recovery (TOPAZ): Dynamic myocardial T1 mapping using a cine steady‐state look‐locker approach , 2018, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  Nikos D. Sidiropoulos,et al.  Tensor Decomposition for Signal Processing and Machine Learning , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[12]  Michael Elad,et al.  Calibrationless parallel imaging reconstruction based on structured low‐rank matrix completion , 2013, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  A. Manduca,et al.  Local versus Global Low-Rank Promotion in Dynamic MRI Series Reconstruction , 2010 .

[14]  Jan Sijbers,et al.  Denoising of diffusion MRI using random matrix theory , 2016, NeuroImage.

[15]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Diffusion Weighted Image Denoising Using Overcomplete Local PCA , 2013, PloS one.

[16]  Armando Manduca,et al.  A Unified Tensor Regression Framework for Calibrationless Dynamic , Multi-Channel MRI Reconstruction , 2012 .

[17]  J. Pauly,et al.  Accelerating parameter mapping with a locally low rank constraint , 2015, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  Daniel K Sodickson,et al.  Low‐rank plus sparse matrix decomposition for accelerated dynamic MRI with separation of background and dynamic components , 2015, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  Justin P. Haldar,et al.  Further development of image reconstruction from highly undersampled (k, t)-space data with joint partial separability and sparsity constraints , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[20]  Daniel Messroghli,et al.  State of the Art: Clinical Applications of Cardiac T1 Mapping. , 2016, Radiology.

[21]  Jingwei Zhuo,et al.  P‐LORAKS: Low‐rank modeling of local k‐space neighborhoods with parallel imaging data , 2016, Magnetic resonance in medicine.