Comparative analysis of gingival phenotype in animal and human experimental models using optical coherence tomography in a non-invasive approach

Imaging methods are widely used in diagnostic and among the diversity of modalities, optical coherence tomography (OCT) is nowadays commercially available and considered the most innovative technique used for imaging applications, in both medical and non-medical applications. In this study, we exploit the OCT technique in the oral cavity for identification and differentiation between free and attached gingiva, as well as determining the gingival phenotype, an important factor to determination of periodontal prognosis in patients. For the animal studies, five porcine jaws were analyzed using a Swept Source SS-OCT system operating at 1325nm and stereomicroscope, as gold pattern. The SSOCT at 1325nm was chosen due to the longer central wavelength, that allows to deeper penetration imaging, and the faster image acquisition, an essential factor for clinical setting. For the patient studies, a total of 30 males and female were examined using the SS-OCT at 1325nm and computer controlled periodontal probing. 2D and 3D images of tooth/gingiva interface were performed, and quantitative measurements of the gingival sulcus could be noninvasively obtained. Through the image analysis of the animals jaws, it was possible to quantify the free gingiva and the attached gingiva, the calculus deposition over teeth surface and also the subgingival calculus. For the patient’s studies, we demonstrated that the gingival phenotype could be measured without the periodontal probe introduction at the gingival sulcus, confirming that OCT can be potentially useful in clinic for direct observation and quantification of gingival phenotype in a non-invasive approach.

[1]  Jan Cosyn,et al.  The gingival biotype revisited: transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva. , 2009, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[2]  M. Timmerman,et al.  Comparison of two automated periodontal probes and two probes with a conventional readout in periodontal maintenance patients. , 2006, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[3]  C R Anderegg,et al.  Gingiva thickness in guided tissue regeneration and associated recession at facial furcation defects. , 1995, Journal of periodontology.

[4]  Angela Man,et al.  An update on novel non-invasive approaches for periodontal diagnosis. , 2010, Journal of periodontology.

[5]  Byeong Ha Lee,et al.  Optical approach to the periodontal ligament under orthodontic tooth movement: a preliminary study with optical coherence tomography. , 2009, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[6]  Craig Gimbel Optical coherence tomography diagnostic imaging. , 2008, General dentistry.

[7]  Saba Khan,et al.  Periodontal probing depth measurement: a review. , 2009, Compendium of continuing education in dentistry.

[8]  E H Davies,et al.  Marking width, calibration from tip and tine diameter of periodontal probes. , 1989, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[9]  Mahdi Kadkhodazadeh,et al.  Gingival biotype: a review. , 2013, General dentistry.

[10]  Maciej Wojtkowski,et al.  High-speed optical coherence tomography: basics and applications. , 2010, Applied optics.

[11]  Roberto Andrade,et al.  Intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility of manual probing depth. , 2012, Brazilian oral research.

[12]  Antonio Nanci,et al.  Structure of periodontal tissues in health and disease. , 2006, Periodontology 2000.

[13]  Kitichai Rungcharassaeng,et al.  Gingival biotype assessment in the esthetic zone: visual versus direct measurement. , 2010, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[14]  Rajashri Kolte,et al.  Assessment of gingival thickness with regards to age, gender and arch location , 2014, Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology.

[15]  Jin U. Kang,et al.  In-vivo gingival sulcus imaging using full-range, complex-conjugate-free, endoscopic spectral domain optical coherence tomography , 2012, Other Conferences.

[16]  J J Garnick,et al.  Periodontal probing: probe tip diameter. , 2000, Journal of periodontology.

[17]  Evandro Franco da Rocha,et al.  VARIABILITY OF THE PROBING DEPTH BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL AND CONTROLLED-FORCE PERIODONTAL PROBES , 2003 .

[18]  Ching-Cheng Chuang,et al.  Subgingival calculus imaging based on swept-source optical coherence tomography. , 2011, Journal of biomedical optics.

[19]  L L Otis,et al.  Imaging of hard- and soft-tissue structure in the oral cavity by optical coherence tomography. , 1998, Applied optics.

[20]  A. Kingman,et al.  Effect of partial recording protocols on estimates of prevalence of periodontal disease. , 2005, Journal of periodontology.

[21]  Anthony W. Gargiulo,et al.  Dimensions and Relations of the Dentogingival Junction in Humans , 1961 .

[22]  S Nyman,et al.  Bleeding on probing as it relates to probing pressure and gingival health. , 1991, Journal of clinical periodontology.