Physical Layer Security for Ultra-Reliable and Low-Latency Communications

URLLC is one category of service to be provided by next-generation wireless networks. Motivated by increasing security concerns in such networks, this article focuses on physical layer security in the context of URLLC. The physical layer security technique mainly uses transmission designs based on the intrinsic randomness of the wireless medium to achieve secrecy. As such, physical layer security is of a lower complexity and incurs less latency than traditional cryptography. In this article, we first introduce appropriate performance metrics for evaluating physical layer security in URLLC and investigate the trade-off between latency, reliability, and security. We then identify the key challenging problems for achieving physical layer security in URLLC, and discuss the role that channel state information can have in providing potential solutions to these problems. Finally, we present our recommendations on future research directions in this emerging area.

[1]  Matthieu R. Bloch,et al.  Coding for Secrecy: An Overview of Error-Control Coding Techniques for Physical-Layer Security , 2013, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[2]  Branka Vucetic,et al.  Ultra-Reliable Low Latency Cellular Networks: Use Cases, Challenges and Approaches , 2017, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[3]  Marco Gomes,et al.  Analysis of short blocklength codes for secrecy , 2018, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[4]  Wanshi Chen,et al.  5G-Based Systems Design for Tactile Internet , 2019, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[5]  Zhiguo Ding,et al.  Short-Packet Downlink Transmission With Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[6]  Robert W. Heath,et al.  Securing mmWave Vehicular Communication Links with Multiple Transmit Antennas , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops).

[7]  Byonghyo Shim,et al.  Ultra-Reliable and Low-Latency Communications in 5G Downlink: Physical Layer Aspects , 2017, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[8]  Ekram Hossain,et al.  On Stochastic Geometry Modeling of Cellular Uplink Transmission With Truncated Channel Inversion Power Control , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[9]  Lifeng Wang,et al.  Safeguarding 5G wireless communication networks using physical layer security , 2015, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[10]  Il-Min Kim,et al.  BER-Based Physical Layer Security With Finite Codelength: Combining Strong Converse and Error Amplification , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[11]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Channel Coding Rate in the Finite Blocklength Regime , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[12]  Vinod Sharma,et al.  On secrecy above secrecy capacity , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Communication Systems (ICCS).

[13]  Byung-Jae Kwak,et al.  LDPC Codes for the Gaussian Wiretap Channel , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[14]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Secrecy-reliability tradeoff for semi-deterministic wiretap channels at finite Blocklength , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT).