Parameter Estimation for Gravitational-wave Bursts with the BayesWave Pipeline

We provide a comprehensive multi-aspect study of the performance of a pipeline used by the LIGO-Virgo Collaboration for estimating parameters of gravitational-wave bursts. We add simulated signals with four different morphologies (sine-Gaussians (SGs), Gaussians, white-noise bursts, and binary black hole signals) to simulated noise samples representing noise of the two Advanced LIGO detectors during their first observing run. We recover them with the BayesWave (BW) pipeline to study its accuracy in sky localization, waveform reconstruction, and estimation of model-independent waveform parameters. BW localizes sources with a level of accuracy comparable for all four morphologies, with the median separation of actual and estimated sky locations ranging from 25.°1 to 30.°3. This is a reasonable accuracy in the two-detector case, and is comparable to accuracies of other localization methods studied previously. As BW reconstructs generic transient signals with SG wavelets, it is unsurprising that BW performs best in reconstructing SG and Gaussian waveforms. The BW accuracy in waveform reconstruction increases steeply with the network signal-to-noise ratio (S/N ), reaching a 85% and 95% match between the reconstructed and actual waveform below S/N and S/N , respectively, for all morphologies. The BW accuracy in estimating central moments of waveforms is only limited by statistical errors in the frequency domain, and is also affected by systematic errors in the time domain as BW cannot reconstruct low-amplitude parts of signals that are overwhelmed by noise. The figures of merit we introduce can be used in future characterizations of parameter estimation pipelines.

[1]  S. Klimenko,et al.  On similarity of binary black hole gravitational-wave skymaps: to observe or to wait? , 2016, 1611.02438.

[2]  D Huet,et al.  GW151226: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a 22-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence , 2016 .

[3]  R. Bonnand,et al.  Observing gravitational-wave transient GW150914 with minimal assumptions , 2016 .

[4]  P. Giommi,et al.  Localization and broadband follow-up of the gravitational-wave transient GW150914 , 2016, 1602.08492.

[5]  Tomasz Bulik,et al.  The first gravitational-wave source from the isolated evolution of two stars in the 40–100 solar mass range , 2016, Nature.

[6]  Robert W. Taylor,et al.  ASTROPHYSICAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE BINARY BLACK HOLE MERGER GW150914 , 2016 .

[7]  B. A. Boom,et al.  ScholarWorks @ UTRGV ScholarWorks @ UTRGV Properties of the Binary Black Hole Merger GW150914 Properties of the Binary Black Hole Merger GW150914 , 2016 .

[8]  T. Littenberg,et al.  Enabling high confidence detections of gravitational-wave bursts , 2015, 1511.08752.

[9]  Erik Katsavounidis,et al.  Information-theoretic approach to the gravitational-wave burst detection problem , 2015, 1511.05955.

[10]  G. Mitselmakher,et al.  Method for detection and reconstruction of gravitational wave transients with networks of advanced detectors , 2015, 1511.05999.

[11]  S. Klimenko,et al.  Leveraging waveform complexity for confident detection of gravitational waves , 2015, 1509.06423.

[12]  N. M. Brown,et al.  Prospects for Observing and Localizing Gravitational-Wave Transients with Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo , 2013, Living Reviews in Relativity.

[13]  M. S. Shahriar,et al.  Characterization of the LIGO detectors during their sixth science run , 2014, 1410.7764.

[14]  P. Graff,et al.  Parameter estimation for compact binaries with ground-based gravitational-wave observations using the LALInference software library , 2014, 1409.7215.

[15]  P. Graff,et al.  PARAMETER ESTIMATION FOR BINARY NEUTRON-STAR COALESCENCES WITH REALISTIC NOISE DURING THE ADVANCED LIGO ERA , 2014, 1411.6934.

[16]  Neil J. Cornish,et al.  Bayeswave: Bayesian inference for gravitational wave bursts and instrument glitches , 2014, 1410.3835.

[17]  Erik Katsavounidis,et al.  LOCALIZATION OF SHORT DURATION GRAVITATIONAL-WAVE TRANSIENTS WITH THE EARLY ADVANCED LIGO AND VIRGO DETECTORS , 2014, 1409.2435.

[18]  Philip Graff,et al.  THE FIRST TWO YEARS OF ELECTROMAGNETIC FOLLOW-UP WITH ADVANCED LIGO AND VIRGO , 2014, 1404.5623.

[19]  K. S. Thorne,et al.  All-sky search for gravitational-wave bursts in the second joint LIGO-Virgo run , 2012, 1202.2788.

[20]  S. Klimenko,et al.  Localization of gravitational wave sources with networks of advanced detectors , 2011, 1101.5408.

[21]  M Hannam,et al.  Inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms for black-hole binaries with nonprecessing spins. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[22]  F. Ohme,et al.  Simulations of black-hole binaries with unequal masses or nonprecessing spins: Accuracy, physical pr , 2010 .

[23]  G. Mitselmakher,et al.  A coherent method for detection of gravitational wave bursts , 2004 .

[24]  P. Green Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination , 1995 .

[25]  J. Kiefer,et al.  Asymptotic Minimax Character of the Sample Distribution Function and of the Classical Multinomial Estimator , 1956 .