Characteristics of small lung cancers invisible on conventional chest radiography and detected by population based screening using spiral CT.

Conventional chest radiography (CXR) is a poor diagnostic tool for detecting lung cancers at a surgically curable stage. To determine the visibility of peripheral small lung cancers on CXR, we retrospectively examined the usefulness of CXR using a consecutive series of 44 cases detected on CT screening and later confirmed by histopathology. All cases had been detected by low dose CT during a population based screening trial for lung cancer. The control group consisted of 48 chest radiographs of normal subjects. Tumour diameters ranged from 6 mm to 45 mm, with 95% (42/44) < or = 20 mm, and 5% (2/44) > 20 mm. CXR failed to detect 77% (34/44) of all cancers, including 79% (33/42) < or = 20 mm and 50% (1/2) > 20 mm. Of the 42 lung cancers < or = 20 mm, 74% (31/42) were located in the well penetrated lung zones and 71% (22/31) of these were missed on CXR. 26% (11/42) were concealed by hilar vessels, mediastinum, heart or diaphragm, and all (11/11) of these were missed on CXR. 93% (39/42) of the lung cancers < or = 20 mm were adenocarcinomas and 79% (31/39) of these were missed on CXR. 7% (3/42) were epidermoid carcinomas or small cell carcinomas and 66% (2/3) of these were missed on CXR. The overall accuracy of interpretation on CXR for lung cancers was 61%, sensitivity was 23% and specificity 96%. Although there was an association between presence of lung cancer and positive reading of CXR (chi 2 test of association, p < 0.05), the percentage of positive readings was only 23%. Thus, CXR was poor at visualizing CT detectable lung cancers of < or = 20 mm diameter, which are usually of very low density, and cannot be relied upon for detection of surgically curable small lung cancer.

[1]  W. E. Miller,et al.  Lung cancer detected during a screening program using four-month chest radiographs. , 1983, Radiology.

[2]  B J Flehinger,et al.  Non-small-cell lung cancer: results of the New York screening program. , 1984, Radiology.

[3]  S S Sagel,et al.  CT of the pulmonary nodule: a cooperative study. , 1986, Radiology.

[4]  D. McCauley,et al.  Low-dose CT of the lungs: preliminary observations. , 1990, Radiology.

[5]  Satomi Takahashi,et al.  Clinical and prognostic assessment of patients with resected small peripheral lung cancer lesions , 1990, Cancer.

[6]  D. Winchester,et al.  National survey of the pattern of care for carcinoma of the lung. , 1990, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[7]  N. Müller,et al.  Solitary pulmonary nodule: high-resolution CT and radiologic-pathologic correlation. , 1991, Radiology.

[8]  E. Bergstralh,et al.  Screening for lung cancer. A critique of the mayo lung project , 1991, Cancer.

[9]  J. Austin,et al.  Missed bronchogenic carcinoma: radiographic findings in 27 patients with a potentially resectable lesion evident in retrospect. , 1992, Radiology.

[10]  M. Melamed,et al.  The effect of surgical treatment on survival from early lung cancer. Implications for screening. , 1992, Chest.

[11]  T Iinuma,et al.  [Preliminary specification of X-ray CT for lung cancer screening (LSCT) and its evaluation on risk-cost-effectiveness]. , 1992, Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai zasshi. Nippon acta radiologica.

[12]  S. Kohno,et al.  Limitation of annual screening chest radiography for the diagnosis of lung cancer. A retrospective study , 1993, Cancer.

[13]  M. Mack,et al.  Thoracoscopy for the diagnosis of the indeterminate solitary pulmonary nodule. , 1993, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[14]  C E Ravin,et al.  Chest radiography: estimated lung volume and projected area obscured by the heart, mediastinum, and diaphragm. , 1994, Radiology.

[15]  Yoshihiro Matsuno,et al.  Surgically Curable “Early” Adenocarcinoma in the Periphery of the Lung , 1994, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[16]  K. Yamashita,et al.  Small peripheral lung carcinoma evaluated with incremental dynamic CT: radiologic-pathologic correlation. , 1995, Radiology.

[17]  T Iinuma,et al.  [A pilot study with lung-cancer screening CT (LSCT) at the secondary screening for lung cancer detection]. , 1995, Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai zasshi. Nippon acta radiologica.

[18]  M. Mack,et al.  Diagnosing the indeterminate pulmonary nodule: percutaneous biopsy versus thoracoscopy. , 1995, Surgery.

[19]  R. Tsuchiya,et al.  Lymph node involvement, recurrence, and prognosis in resected small, peripheral, non-small-cell lung carcinomas: are these carcinomas candidates for video-assisted lobectomy? , 1996, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[20]  H. Ohmatsu,et al.  Peripheral lung cancer: screening and detection with low-dose spiral CT versus radiography. , 1996, Radiology.

[21]  C. Mountain,et al.  Revisions in the International System for Staging Lung Cancer. , 1997, Chest.

[22]  S. Sone,et al.  Factors affecting the radiologic appearance of peripheral bronchogenic carcinomas. , 1997, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[23]  P. Wingo,et al.  Cancer statistics, 1997 , 1997, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[24]  R. Munden,et al.  Small pulmonary lesions detected at CT: clinical importance. , 1997, Radiology.

[25]  K. Mori,et al.  Utility of Low‐Dose Helical CT as a Second Step After Plain Chest Radiography for Mass Screening for Lung Cancer , 1997, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[26]  D. Sugarbaker,et al.  Screening for Lung Cancer: Another Look; A Different View , 1997 .

[27]  Feng Li,et al.  Mass screening for lung cancer with mobile spiral computed tomography scanner , 1998, The Lancet.

[28]  H Rusinek,et al.  Pulmonary nodule detection: low-dose versus conventional CT. , 1998, Radiology.

[29]  T. Westermeier,et al.  Pulmonary nodules: detection with low-dose vs conventional-dose spiral CT , 1998, European Radiology.

[30]  S Sone,et al.  Detection of Small Peripheral Lung Cancer by Digital Chest Radiography , 1999, Acta radiologica.

[31]  G. Bepler,et al.  Screening for lung cancer. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.