Modeling long-term yield trends of Miscanthus × giganteus using experimental data from across Europe.

Abstract Miscanthus  ×  giganteus is a perennial grass that is considered to have a high feedstock potential for bioenergy production. Assessment of that potential is however highly related to the crop yields and to their change through the crop lifetime, which is expected to be longer than 20 years. M. giganteus is known to have an establishment phase during which annual yields increased as a function of crop age, followed by a ceiling phase, the duration of which is unknown. We built a database including 16 European long-term experiments (i) to describe the yield evolution during the establishment and the ceiling phases and (ii) to determine whether M. giganteus ceiling phase is followed by a decline phase where yields decrease across years. Data were analyzed through comparisons between a set of statistical growth models. The model that best fitted the experimental data included a decline phase. The decline intensity and the value of several other model parameters, such as the maximum yield reached during the ceiling phase or the duration of the establishment phase, were highly variable. The highest maximum yields were obtained in the experiments located in the southern part of the studied area and the duration of the establishment phase was strongly related to the establishment method. Since energetic viability and profitability of M. giganteus hinge critically on yields, these results could be integrated in further assessment works.

[1]  John Clifton-Brown,et al.  Carbon mitigation by the energy crop, Miscanthus , 2007 .

[2]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[3]  A. Faaij,et al.  The economical and environmental performance of miscanthus and switchgrass production and supply chains in a European setting , 2009 .

[4]  Andrew B. Riche,et al.  Growth, yield and mineral content of Miscanthus × giganteus grown as a biofuel for 14 successive harvests , 2008 .

[5]  J. Scurlock,et al.  The development and current status of perennial rhizomatous grasses as energy crops in the US and Europe , 2003 .

[6]  H. Zub,et al.  Agronomic and physiological performances of different species of Miscanthus, a major energy crop. A review , 2010, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[7]  J. Greef,et al.  Syntaxonomy of Miscanthus x giganteus Greef et Deu , 1993 .

[8]  R. Schneider,et al.  Role of Pythium in sugarcane stubble decline: effects on plant growth in field soil , 1988 .

[9]  Enrico Bonari,et al.  Comparison of Arundo donax L. and Miscanthus x giganteus in a long-term field experiment in Central Italy: Analysis of productive characteristics and energy balance , 2009 .

[10]  Iris Lewandowski,et al.  Propagation method as an important factor in the growth and development of Miscanthus×giganteus , 1998 .

[11]  H. Zub,et al.  Key traits for biomass production identified in different Miscanthus species at two harvest dates. , 2011 .

[12]  Thomas B. Voigt,et al.  Miscanthus: A Promising Biomass Crop , 2010 .

[13]  A. Monti,et al.  Cradle-to-farm gate life cycle assessment in perennial energy crops , 2009 .

[14]  H. Akaike.  A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[15]  David Styles,et al.  Energy crops in Ireland: Quantifying the potential life-cycle greenhouse gas reductions of energy-crop electricity , 2007 .

[16]  I. Lewandowski,et al.  Comparing annual and perennial energy cropping systems with different management intensities , 2008 .

[17]  Fernando E. Miguez,et al.  Meta-analysis of the effects of management factors on Miscanthus × giganteus growth and biomass production , 2008 .

[18]  J. Machet,et al.  Nutrient requirements of Miscanthus x giganteus: Conclusions from a review of published studies , 2012 .

[19]  D. G. Christian,et al.  Performance of 15 Miscanthus genotypes at five sites in Europe , 2001 .

[20]  Matthew J. Aylott,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions from four bioenergy crops in England and Wales: Integrating spatial estimates of yield and soil carbon balance in life cycle analyses , 2009 .

[21]  MICHAEL B. Jones,et al.  Life-cycle environmental and economic impacts of energy-crop fuel-chains: an integrated assessment of potential GHG avoidance in Ireland , 2008 .

[22]  D. Bates,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .

[23]  M. Chase,et al.  Characterization of a genetic resource collection for Miscanthus (Saccharinae, Andropogoneae, Poaceae) using AFLP and ISSR PCR. , 2002, Annals of botany.

[24]  J. Lammel,et al.  Cultivation of Miscanthus under West European conditions: Seasonal changes in dry matter production, nutrient uptake and remobilization , 1997, Plant and Soil.

[25]  Fernando E. Miguez,et al.  Modeling spatial and dynamic variation in growth, yield, and yield stability of the bioenergy crops Miscanthus × giganteus and Panicum virgatum across the conterminous United States , 2012 .

[26]  Thomas B. Voigt,et al.  A quantitative review comparing the yields of two candidate C4 perennial biomass crops in relation to nitrogen, temperature and water , 2004 .

[27]  Marie-Hélène Jeuffroy,et al.  Biomass production and nitrogen accumulation and remobilisation by Miscanthus × giganteus as influenced by nitrogen stocks in belowground organs. , 2011 .

[28]  Simone Graeff-Hönninger,et al.  Long‐term yield and performance of 15 different Miscanthus genotypes in southwest Germany , 2012 .

[29]  David Styles,et al.  Energy crops in Ireland: an economic comparison of willow and Miscanthus production with conventional farming systems. , 2008 .

[30]  C. Jung,et al.  Genetic diversity of European Miscanthus species revealed by AFLP fingerprinting , 1997, Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution.

[31]  D. G. Christian,et al.  Performance of 15 different Miscanthus species and genotypes over 11 years , 2008 .

[32]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[33]  John Clifton-Brown,et al.  Miscanthus : European experience with a novel energy crop , 2000 .

[34]  C. Ghersa,et al.  An analysis of the factors that influence sugarcane yield in Northern Argentina using classification and regression trees , 2009 .

[35]  K. Głowacka,et al.  Variation on biomass yield and morphological traits of energy grasses from the genus Miscanthus during the first years of crop establishment , 2011 .

[36]  Michael J. Bell,et al.  Managing yield decline in sugarcane cropping systems , 2005 .

[37]  Bruce E. Dale,et al.  Comparative life cycle assessment of centralized and distributed biomass processing systems combined with mixed feedstock landscapes , 2011 .