4D ML reconstruction as a tool for volumetric PET-based treatment verification in ion beam radiotherapy.

PURPOSE An innovative strategy to improve the sensitivity of positron emission tomography (PET)-based treatment verification in ion beam radiotherapy is proposed. METHODS Low counting statistics PET images acquired during or shortly after the treatment (Measured PET) and a Monte Carlo estimate of the same PET images derived from the treatment plan (Expected PET) are considered as two frames of a 4D dataset. A 4D maximum likelihood reconstruction strategy was adapted to iteratively estimate the annihilation events distribution in a reference frame and the deformation motion fields that map it in the Expected PET and Measured PET frames. The outputs generated by the proposed strategy are as follows: (1) an estimate of the Measured PET with an image quality comparable to the Expected PET and (2) an estimate of the motion field mapping Expected PET to Measured PET. The details of the algorithm are presented and the strategy is preliminarily tested on analytically simulated datasets. RESULTS The algorithm demonstrates (1) robustness against noise, even in the worst conditions where 1.5 × 10(4) true coincidences and a random fraction of 73% are simulated; (2) a proper sensitivity to different kind and grade of mismatches ranging between 1 and 10 mm; (3) robustness against bias due to incorrect washout modeling in the Monte Carlo simulation up to 1/3 of the original signal amplitude; and (4) an ability to describe the mismatch even in presence of complex annihilation distributions such as those induced by two perpendicular superimposed ion fields. CONCLUSIONS The promising results obtained in this work suggest the applicability of the method as a quantification tool for PET-based treatment verification in ion beam radiotherapy. An extensive assessment of the proposed strategy on real treatment verification data is planned.

[1]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: a survey , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Patient study of in vivo verification of beam delivery and range, using positron emission tomography and computed tomography imaging after proton therapy. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Comparison between in-beam and offline positron emission tomography imaging of proton and carbon ion therapeutic irradiation at synchrotron- and cyclotron-based facilities. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  Katia Parodi,et al.  PET monitoring of hadrontherapy , 2012 .

[5]  Christopher Kurz,et al.  Current status of 4D offline PET-based treatment verification at the Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center , 2013, 2013 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (2013 NSS/MIC).

[6]  Katia Parodi,et al.  PET/CT imaging for treatment verification after proton therapy: a study with plastic phantoms and metallic implants. , 2007, Medical physics.

[7]  Ronald J. Jaszczak,et al.  Three-dimensional motion estimation with image reconstruction for gated cardiac ECT , 2003 .

[8]  G. Fakhri,et al.  Monitoring proton therapy with PET. , 2015, The British journal of radiology.

[9]  S. Jan,et al.  Technical note: Implementation of biological washout processes within GATE/GEANT4--a Monte Carlo study in the case of carbon therapy treatments. , 2015, Medical physics.

[10]  Valentino Bettinardi,et al.  Regularized ML reconstruction for time/dose reduction in 18F-fluoride PET/CT studies , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Katia Parodi,et al.  PET imaging for treatment verification of ion therapy: Implementation and experience at GSI Darmstadt and MGH Boston , 2008 .

[12]  H Paganetti,et al.  Automation and uncertainty analysis of a method for in-vivo range verification in particle therapy , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  Christopher Kurz,et al.  PET-CT scanner characterization for PET raw data use in biomedical research , 2014, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[14]  Julia Bauer,et al.  Clinical investigations of a 4D ML reconstruction strategy for PET-based treatment verification in ion beam therapy , 2014, 2014 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC).

[15]  Katia Parodi,et al.  A filtering approach based on Gaussian–powerlaw convolutions for local PET verification of proton radiotherapy , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  K Parodi,et al.  Dose quantification from in-beam positron emission tomography. , 2004, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[17]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Implementation and workflow for PET monitoring of therapeutic ion irradiation: a comparison of in-beam, in-room, and off-line techniques , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  Paolo Zaffino,et al.  Automatic segmentation of head and neck CT images for radiotherapy treatment planning using multiple atlases, statistical appearance models, and geodesic active contours. , 2014, Medical physics.

[19]  Jürgen Hesser,et al.  A deconvolution approach for PET-based dose reconstruction in proton radiotherapy , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  N Kandasamy,et al.  On developing B-spline registration algorithms for multi-core processors , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  Weiguo Lu,et al.  A simple fixed-point approach to invert a deformation field. , 2007, Medical physics.

[22]  Wolfgang Birkfellner,et al.  Using statistical measures for automated comparison of in-beam PET data. , 2012, Medical physics.

[23]  Jan-Jakob Sonke,et al.  Challenges of radiotherapy: report on the 4D treatment planning workshop 2013. , 2014, Physica medica (Testo stampato).

[24]  Julia Bauer,et al.  Regional MLEM reconstruction strategy for PET-based treatment verification in ion beam radiotherapy , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Joint estimation of respiratory motion and activity in 4D PET using CT side information , 2006, 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro, 2006..

[26]  W Enghardt,et al.  On the feasibility of automatic detection of range deviations from in-beam PET data. , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Four-Dimensional Image Reconstruction Strategies in Cardiac-Gated and Respiratory-Gated PET Imaging. , 2013, PET clinics.

[28]  Chiara Gianoli,et al.  Proposal of a 4D ML reconstruction strategy for PET-based treatment verification in ion beam radiotherapy , 2014, 2014 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC).

[29]  Magdalena Rafecas,et al.  Joint image and motion reconstruction for PET using a B-spline motion model , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[30]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Joint Reconstruction of Image and Motion in Gated Positron Emission Tomography , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[31]  Christopher Kurz,et al.  Implementation and initial clinical experience of offline PET/CT-based verification of scanned carbon ion treatment. , 2013, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[32]  Christopher Kurz,et al.  Investigating the limits of PET/CT imaging at very low true count rates and high random fractions in ion-beam therapy monitoring. , 2015, Medical physics.