The Total Product Design Concept and an Application to the Auto Market

As traditional sources of competitive advantage shrink, firms seek new ones. One such source of competitive advantage is product design because of its effects on customer experience. To understand the role and impact of product design on customer experience, we propose an integrated, customer-based framework for product design that we call the total product design concept (TPDC). We define a product's TPDC as consisting of three elements, namely functionality, aesthetics, and meaning, each of which arises from more elemental product characteristics. We elaborate on the structure of a product's TPDC, its three elements, and the links between those elements and customers' experience with a product. We provide an illustrative application of the TPDC using data from the U.S. auto market. The findings from that application support the proposed three-dimensional view of the TPDC, and demonstrate heterogeneity both in the TPDC's structure and its effects on customer satisfaction. For all three segments, functionality enhances customer satisfaction. For the largest segment of customers, functionality is the most important factor, followed by aesthetics. For the other two segments, customer satisfaction is most influenced by the meaning element of TPDC. We discuss the implications of these findings for the auto industry in particular, and the potential use of the TPDC more generally.

[1]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[2]  Robert W. Veryzer The Roles of Marketing and Industrial Design in Discontinuous New Product Development , 2005 .

[3]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  The Design of Things to Come: How Ordinary People Create Extraordinary Products , 2005 .

[4]  Yiu-Fai Yung,et al.  Finite mixtures in confirmatory factor-analysis models , 1997 .

[5]  Girish N. Punj,et al.  An Interaction Framework of Consumer Decision Making , 1983 .

[6]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Future of Competition: Co-Creating Unique Value With Customers , 2004 .

[7]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Product Development Decisions: A Review of the Literature , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[8]  R. Kozinets Can Consumers Escape the Market? Emancipatory Illuminations from Burning Man , 2002 .

[9]  V. Mahajan,et al.  Form versus Function: How the Intensities of Specific Emotions Evoked in Functional versus Hedonic Trade-Offs Mediate Product Preferences , 2007 .

[10]  D. Rivett,et al.  ‘Marketing aesthetics: The strategic management of brands, identity and image’ , 1998 .

[11]  Peter H. Bloch Seeking the Ideal Form: Product Design and Consumer Response , 1995 .

[12]  D. Littler Design and Marketing of New Products , 1981 .

[13]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[14]  J. W. Hutchinson,et al.  The Influence of Unity and Prototypicality on Aesthetic Responses to New Product Designs , 1998 .

[15]  Gregory R. Hancock,et al.  Advances in Latent Variable Mixture Models , 2007 .

[16]  G. Santayana The Sense of Beauty , 2019 .

[17]  Mariëlle E. H. Creusen,et al.  The Different Roles of Product Appearance in Consumer Choice , 2005 .

[18]  P. Green,et al.  Thirty Years of Conjoint Analysis: Reflections and Prospects , 2001 .

[19]  P. Kotler,et al.  DESIGN: A POWERFUL BUT NEGLECTED STRATEGIC TOOL , 1984 .

[20]  Todd J. Arnold,et al.  Individual Differences in the Centrality of Visual Product Aesthetics: Concept and Measurement , 2003 .

[21]  S. Fournier,et al.  Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research , 1998 .

[22]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  New Industrial Product Design and Evaluation Using Multiattribute Value Analysis , 1987 .

[23]  Marsha L. Richins,et al.  A Consumer Values Orientation for Materialism and Its Measurement: Scale Development and Validation , 1992 .

[24]  S. Beatty,et al.  External Search Effort: An Investigation across Several Product Categories , 1987 .

[25]  L. Berry,et al.  Managing the Total Customer Experience , 2002 .

[26]  Sarv Devaraj,et al.  PRODUCT AND SERVICE QUALITY: THE ANTECEDENTS OF CUSTOMER LOYALTY IN THE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY , 2001 .

[27]  Haiyang Yang,et al.  Consumer Decision Making , 2015 .

[28]  A. Tynan,et al.  Market Segmentation , 2018, Entrepreneurial Management Theory and Practice.

[29]  Geoffrey J. McLachlan,et al.  Finite Mixture Models , 2019, Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application.

[30]  V. Mahajan,et al.  Delight by Design: The Role of Hedonic versus Utilitarian Benefits , 2008 .

[31]  Edward E. Rigdon,et al.  Advances in Latent Variable Mixture Models , 2010 .

[32]  Ricardo Chiva,et al.  Investment in Design and Firm Performance: The Mediating Role of Design Management* , 2009 .

[33]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Linking Marketing and Engineering Product Design Decisions via Analytical Target Cascading , 2005 .

[34]  Bengt Muthén,et al.  Multilevel Latent Class Analysis: An Application of Adolescent Smoking Typologies With Individual and Contextual Predictors , 2010, Structural equation modeling : a multidisciplinary journal.

[35]  J. Mazanec,et al.  Consumer decision making. , 1994 .

[36]  Marjorie B. Platt,et al.  The Impact of Industrial Design Effectiveness on Corporate Financial Performance , 2005 .

[37]  W. DeSarbo,et al.  Finite-Mixture Structural Equation Models for Response-Based Segmentation and Unobserved Heterogeneity , 1997 .

[38]  Robert W. Veryzer The Place of Product Design and Aesthetics in Consumer Research , 1995 .