How do virtual teams process information? A literature review and implications for management

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to inform readers on what is known on information processing in virtual teams and to discuss the consequences of these findings for the management of virtual teams.Design/methodology approach – Systematic review of the literature on information processing in virtual teams based on a general information processing model for teams.Findings – An overview of the most relevant factors that influence the effectiveness of virtual teams is provided.Research limitations/implications – The review is based on existing literature on virtual teams and it discusses future research directions opened by the conceptualization of virtual teams as information processing systems.Practical implications – The paper identifies the factors that can improve the effectiveness of information processing in virtual teams.Originality/value – The general information‐processing model for teams enables a systematic integration of the fragmented literature on virtual teams.

[1]  Verlin B. Hinsz,et al.  The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  Francisco J. Gracia,et al.  Affective responses to work process and outcomes in virtual teams: Effects of communication media and time pressure , 2005 .

[3]  Richard M. Young,et al.  Introduction to This Special issue on Cognitive Architectures and Human-Computer , 1997, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[4]  J. Hackman A Normative Model of Work Team Effectiveness , 1983 .

[5]  J. Valacich,et al.  Group Size and Anonymity Effects on Computer-Mediated Idea Generation , 1992 .

[6]  Frances J. Milliken,et al.  Searching for Common Threads: Understanding the Multiple Effects of Diversity in Organizational Groups , 1996 .

[7]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Future research in group support systems: needs, some questions and possible directions , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[8]  C. Gibson From knowledge accumulation to accommodation: cycles of collective cognition in work groups , 2001 .

[9]  Randy Hirokawa,et al.  To Err is Human, to Correct for it Divine , 2001 .

[10]  T. Ostrom,et al.  Three Catechisms for Social Memory , 1989 .

[11]  John J. Sosik,et al.  Inspiring Group Creativity , 1998 .

[12]  P. Curșeu Formal group decision-making: A social-cognitive approach. , 2003 .

[13]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion , 1985 .

[14]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  Toward Contextualized Theories of Trust: The Role of Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  I. Zigurs Leadership in virtual teams: Oxymoron or opportunity? , 2003 .

[16]  Likoebe M. Maruping,et al.  Managing team interpersonal processes through technology: a task-technology fit perspective. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[17]  John R. Carlson,et al.  Media Appropriateness in the Conduct and Discovery of Deceptive Communication: The Relative Influence of Richness and Synchronicity , 2004 .

[18]  P. Curșeu,et al.  The Effects of Framing on Inter-group Negotiation , 2008 .

[19]  Petru Lucian Curseu,et al.  Emergent states in virtual teams: a complex adaptive systems perspective , 2006, J. Inf. Technol..

[20]  J. Pissarra,et al.  Idea generation through computer‐mediated communication: the effects of anonymity , 2005 .

[21]  Wayne F. Cascio,et al.  E-Leadership and Virtual Teams , 2008, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[22]  M. Maznevski,et al.  Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness , 2000 .

[23]  Merrill Warkentin,et al.  Virtual Teams versus Face-to-Face Teams: An Exploratory Study of a Web-based Conference System* , 1997 .

[24]  Michael D. Byrne,et al.  ACT-R/PM and menu selection: applying a cognitive architecture to HCI , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[25]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Information Exchange and Use in Group Decision Making: You Can Lead a Group to Information, but You Can't Make It Think , 1996, MIS Q..

[26]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication , 1986 .

[27]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Managing Distances and Differences in Geographically Distributed Work Groups , 2002 .

[28]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Getting It Together: Temporal Coordination and Conflict Management in Global Virtual Teams , 2001 .

[29]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A Theory of Task/Technology Fit and Group Support Systems Effectiveness , 1998, MIS Q..

[30]  M. Cranach,et al.  The group as a self-active system: outline of a theory of group action , 1986 .

[31]  T. Gelder Cognitive Architecture : What Choice Do We Have ? , 1998 .

[32]  Jessica Lipnack,et al.  Virtual Teams: Reaching Across Space, Time, and Organizations with Technology , 1997 .

[33]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Dynamic nature of trust in virtual teams , 2002, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[34]  Randy Hirokawa Functional Approaches to the Study of Group Discussion , 1994 .

[35]  Ikujiro Nonaka,et al.  The `ART' of knowledge:: Systems to capitalize on market knowledge , 1998 .

[36]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Lessons from a Dozen Years of Group Support Systems Research: A Discussion of Lab and Field Findings , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[37]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes , 2001 .

[38]  J. Valacich,et al.  Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one. , 1993 .

[39]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[40]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Out of Sight, Out of Sync: Understanding Conflict in Distributed Teams , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[41]  R. Daft,et al.  Information Richness. A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organization Design , 1983 .

[42]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[43]  N. Gillespie,et al.  Transformational leadership and shared values: the building blocks of trust , 2004 .

[44]  Randy Hirokawa Group Communication and Decision-Making Performance: A Continued Test of the Functional Perspective. , 1988 .

[45]  J. H. Davis Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. , 1973 .

[46]  Sandra Schruijer,et al.  The effects of groups' variety and disparity on groups' cognitive complexity , 2007 .

[47]  C. Marlene Fiol,et al.  Identification in Face-to-Face, Hybrid, and Pure Virtual Teams: Untangling the Contradictions , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[48]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Leadership Effectiveness in Global Virtual Teams , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[49]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Information Technology to Support Electronic Meetings , 1988, MIS Q..

[50]  R. Peterson,et al.  Task Conflict snd Relationship Conflict in Top Management Teams:The Pivotal Role of Intragroup Trust. , 1998 .

[51]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  The Impact of Team Empowerment on Virtual Team Performance: The Moderating Role of Face-to-Face Interaction , 2004 .

[52]  Garold Stasser,et al.  Computer simulation as a research tool: The DISCUSS model of group decision making , 1988 .

[53]  B. Tuckman,et al.  Stages of Small-Group Development Revisited , 1977 .

[54]  Mahesh S. Raisinghani,et al.  An empirical study of best practices in virtual teams , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[55]  Michael Parent,et al.  Knowledge creation in focus groups: can group technologies help? , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[56]  I. Benbasat,et al.  The Effects of Group, Task,Context, and Technology Variables on the Usefulness of Group Support Systems , 1993 .

[57]  Merrill Warkentin,et al.  Training to improve virtual team communication , 1999, Inf. Syst. J..

[58]  A. Caetano,et al.  Exploring the effects of intragroup conflict and past performance feedback on team effectiveness , 2005 .

[59]  R. Watson,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication and Majority Influence , 1998 .

[60]  J. Mathieu,et al.  The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[61]  Richard E. Potter,et al.  Understanding Human Interaction and Performance in the Virtual Team , 2002 .

[62]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  An Assessment of Group Support Systems Experimental Research: Methodology and Results , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[63]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Information exchange and use in GSS and verbal group decision making: effects of minority influence , 1997, Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[64]  A. Hollingshead Information Suppression and Status Persistence in Group Decision Making The Effects of Communication Media , 1996 .

[65]  Hsin-Ginn Hwang,et al.  The effect of group size on group performance in computer-supported decision making , 1994, Inf. Manag..

[66]  Richard Lee An Enterprise Decision Framework for Information System Selection , 1998, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[67]  Ramón Rico,et al.  Effects of task interdependence and type of communication on performance in virtual teams , 2005 .

[68]  D. Wegner,et al.  Transactive memory in close relationships. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[69]  Benson Rosen,et al.  Virtual team effectiveness: a proposed research agenda , 1999, Inf. Syst. J..

[70]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[71]  Jose Manuel Guerra,et al.  Types of intragroup conflict and affective reactions , 2005 .

[72]  Dennis S. Gouran,et al.  The Evolution and Current Status of the Functional Perspective on Communication in Decision-Making and Problem-Solving Groups , 1993 .

[73]  Carl Heiles,et al.  The Atomic Component , 1987 .

[74]  Paula R. Kaiser,et al.  Student Team Projects by Internet , 2000 .

[75]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Knowledge integration in virtual teams: The potential role of KMS , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[76]  Uday S. Murthy,et al.  Divergent and Convergent Idea Generation in Teams: A Comparison of Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Communication , 2004 .

[77]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How , 1995 .

[78]  I. Nonaka,et al.  SECI, Ba and Leadership: a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation , 2000 .

[79]  Michael E. Kossler,et al.  Geographically dispersed teams , 2007 .

[80]  E. Mannix,et al.  The Dynamic Nature of Conflict: A Longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance. , 2001 .

[81]  S. Jackson,et al.  7 UNDERSTANDING THE DYNAMICS OF DIVERSITY IN DECISION-MAKING TEAMS , 2004 .

[82]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Information exchange and use in GSS and verbal group decision making: effects of minority influence , 1997 .

[83]  Hollenbeck,et al.  Decision Accuracy in Computer-Mediated versus Face-to-Face Decision-Making Teams. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[84]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Group Decision Support Systems and Group Communication , 1993 .

[85]  Dustin K. Jundt,et al.  Teams in organizations: from input-process-output models to IMOI models. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[86]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Understanding Fit and Appropriation Effects in Group Support Systems via Meta-Analysis , 2001, MIS Q..

[87]  E. Salas,et al.  Shared mental models in expert team decision making. , 1993 .

[88]  Linda Argote,et al.  Training People to Work in Groups , 2002 .

[89]  Charles R. Schwenk,et al.  Devil's Advocacy and Dialectical Inquiry Effects on Face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated Group Decision Making , 1995 .

[90]  E. McDonough,et al.  An investigation of the use of global, virtual, and colocated new product development teams , 2001 .

[91]  Richard M. Young,et al.  The Role of Cognitive Architecture in Modeling the User: Soar's Learning Mechanism , 1997, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[92]  G. Northcraft,et al.  You have printed the following article : Why Differences Make a Difference : A Field Study of Diversity , Conflict , and Performance in Workgroups , 2007 .

[93]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  A comparative content analysis of face-to-face vs. asynchronous group decision making , 2003, Decis. Support Syst..

[94]  B. Baltes,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication and Group Decision Making: A Meta-Analysis , 2002 .

[95]  Monica J. Garfield,et al.  Modifying Paradigms: Individual Differences, Creativity Techniques and Exposure to Ideas in Group Idea Generation , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[96]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[97]  Anthony R. Hendrickson,et al.  Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future , 1998 .

[98]  R. Moreland,et al.  Group Versus Individual Training and Group Performance: The Mediating Role of Transactive Memory , 1995 .

[99]  Paul S. Goodman,et al.  Understanding groups in organizations. , 1987 .

[100]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research , 2005 .

[101]  Lucy Gilson,et al.  Virtual Teams: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go From Here? , 2004 .

[102]  Kelly S. Bouas,et al.  The development of group identity in computer and face-to-face groups with membership change , 1995, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[103]  B. Rosen,et al.  Managing the life cycle of virtual teams , 2004 .

[104]  A. Newell Unified Theories of Cognition , 1990 .

[105]  Ross Hightower,et al.  Effects of Communication Mode and Prediscussion Information Distribution Characteristics on Information Exchange in Groups , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[106]  Timothy R. Kayworth,et al.  The global virtual manager: a prescription for success , 2000 .

[107]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  New Product Development Decision-Making Effectiveness: Comparing Individuals, Face-To-Face Teams, and Virtual Teams , 2001, Decis. Sci..

[108]  T. M. Amabile The social psychology of creativity , 1984 .

[109]  R. Moreland Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. , 1999 .

[110]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999 .

[111]  J. McGrath,et al.  Group Task Performance and Communication Technology , 1993 .

[112]  C. Lebiere,et al.  The Atomic Components of Thought , 1998 .