Mathematical models for explaining the Warburg effect: a review focussed on ATP and biomass production.

For producing ATP, tumour cells rely on glycolysis leading to lactate to about the same extent as on respiration. Thus, the ATP synthesis flux from glycolysis is considerably higher than in the corresponding healthy cells. This is known as the Warburg effect (named after German biochemist Otto H. Warburg) and also applies to striated muscle cells, activated lymphocytes, microglia, endothelial cells and several other cell types. For similar phenomena in several yeasts and many bacteria, the terms Crabtree effect and overflow metabolism respectively, are used. The Warburg effect is paradoxical at first sight because the molar ATP yield of glycolysis is much lower than that of respiration. Although a straightforward explanation is that glycolysis allows a higher ATP production rate, the question arises why cells do not re-allocate protein to the high-yield pathway of respiration. Mathematical modelling can help explain this phenomenon. Here, we review several models at various scales proposed in the literature for explaining the Warburg effect. These models support the hypothesis that glycolysis allows for a higher proliferation rate due to increased ATP production and precursor supply rates.

[1]  Xiaoyun Sun,et al.  Inflammatory response of microglial BV‐2 cells includes a glycolytic shift and is modulated by mitochondrial glucose‐regulated protein 75/mortalin , 2013, FEBS letters.

[2]  Georg Regensburger,et al.  Enzyme allocation problems in kinetic metabolic networks: optimal solutions are elementary flux modes. , 2013, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  S. Bonhoeffer,et al.  Cooperation and Competition in the Evolution of ATP-Producing Pathways , 2001, Science.

[4]  Josef Hofbauer,et al.  Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics , 1998 .

[5]  David R. Plas,et al.  Growth Factors Can Influence Cell Growth and Survival through Effects on Glucose Metabolism , 2001, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[6]  W. A. Scheffers,et al.  A theoretical evaluation of growth yields of yeasts , 2004, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.

[7]  S. Schuster,et al.  Evolutionary game theory: cells as players. , 2014, Molecular bioSystems.

[8]  N. V. van Riel,et al.  Combined in vivo and in silico investigations of activation of glycolysis in contracting skeletal muscle. , 2013, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[9]  Peter Carmeliet,et al.  Metabolism of stromal and immune cells in health and disease , 2014, Nature.

[10]  P. Magistretti,et al.  Activity‐dependent regulation of energy metabolism by astrocytes: An update , 2007, Glia.

[11]  R Heinrich,et al.  A theoretical approach to the evolution and structural design of enzymatic networks: linear enzymatic chains, branched pathways and glycolysis of erythrocytes. , 1987, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[12]  Roded Sharan,et al.  Genome-Scale Metabolic Modeling Elucidates the Role of Proliferative Adaptation in Causing the Warburg Effect , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[13]  Chih-Hao Chang,et al.  Fueling Immunity: Insights into Metabolism and Lymphocyte Function , 2013, Science.

[14]  T. Schulz,et al.  Induction of Oxidative Metabolism by Mitochondrial Frataxin Inhibits Cancer Growth , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  S. Shiva,et al.  Platelet mitochondrial function: from regulation of thrombosis to biomarker of disease. , 2013, Biochemical Society transactions.

[16]  Eytan Ruppin,et al.  Metabolic reconstruction, constraint-based analysis and game theory to probe genome-scale metabolic networks. , 2010, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[17]  P. Wood Differential regulation of IL-1α and TNFα release from immortalized murine microglia (BV-2) , 1994 .

[18]  K. H. Wolfe,et al.  Reproductive toxicology. Chemical mixture. , 1997, Environmental health perspectives.

[19]  Christoph Kaleta,et al.  Combining Metabolic Pathway Analysis with Evolutionary Game Theory. Explaining the occurrence of low-yield pathways by an analytic optimization approach , 2011, Biosyst..

[20]  M. A. de Menezes,et al.  Intracellular crowding defines the mode and sequence of substrate uptake by Escherichia coli and constrains its metabolic activity , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  B. Palsson,et al.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae phenotypes can be predicted by using constraint-based analysis of a genome-scale reconstructed metabolic network , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Anis Larbi,et al.  Induction of HIF‐1α and the glycolytic pathway alters apoptotic and differentiation profiles of activated human T cells , 2010, Journal of leukocyte biology.

[23]  B. Teusink,et al.  Shifts in growth strategies reflect tradeoffs in cellular economics , 2009, Molecular systems biology.

[24]  Bas Teusink,et al.  Understanding the Adaptive Growth Strategy of Lactobacillus plantarum by In Silico Optimisation , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[25]  A. Agarwal,et al.  Oxidative phosphorylation versus glycolysis: what fuel do spermatozoa use? , 2014, Asian journal of andrology.

[26]  Radhakrishnan Mahadevan,et al.  Economics of membrane occupancy and respiro-fermentation , 2011, Molecular systems biology.

[27]  L. Cantley,et al.  Understanding the Warburg Effect: The Metabolic Requirements of Cell Proliferation , 2009, Science.

[28]  S. Schuster,et al.  Revisiting the Thermodynamic Theory of Optimal ATP Stoichiometries by Analysis of Various ATP-Producing Metabolic Pathways , 2010, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[29]  S. Schuster,et al.  Game-theoretical approaches to studying the evolution of biochemical systems. , 2005, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[30]  S. Schuster,et al.  An example of the prisoner's dilemma in biochemistry , 2003, Naturwissenschaften.

[31]  P. Rich The molecular machinery of Keilin's respiratory chain. , 2003, Biochemical Society transactions.

[32]  Yi Zhou,et al.  Catabolic efficiency of aerobic glycolysis: The Warburg effect revisited , 2010, BMC Systems Biology.

[33]  Irina Kareva,et al.  Prisoner's Dilemma in Cancer Metabolism , 2011, PloS one.

[34]  F. Berezovskaya,et al.  Cancer immunoediting: A process driven by metabolic competition as a predator-prey-shared resource type model. , 2015, Journal of theoretical biology.

[35]  A. Veiga,et al.  Cyanide-resistant respiration is frequent, but confined to yeasts incapable of aerobic fermentation. , 2000, FEMS microbiology letters.

[36]  D. Fell,et al.  Is maximization of molar yield in metabolic networks favoured by evolution? , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.

[37]  H. Kacser,et al.  Evolution of catalytic proteins , 1984, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[38]  Daniel Boley,et al.  A minimal model for explaining the higher ATP production in the Warburg effect , 2015, PeerJ Prepr..

[39]  Zoran Nikoloski,et al.  A novel approach for determining environment-specific protein costs: the case of Arabidopsis thaliana , 2010, Bioinform..

[40]  R. Gatenby,et al.  The potential role of transformation-induced metabolic changes in tumor-host interaction. , 1995, Cancer research.

[41]  O. Warburg Über den Stoffwechsel der Carcinomzelle , 1924, Naturwissenschaften.

[42]  B. Palsson,et al.  Genome-scale models of microbial cells: evaluating the consequences of constraints , 2004, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[43]  R. Gennis,et al.  Energetic efficiency of Escherichia coli: effects of mutations in components of the aerobic respiratory chain , 1993, Journal of bacteriology.

[44]  J. Spitzer,et al.  Glucose utilization by Kupffer cells, endothelial cells, and granulocytes in endotoxemic rat liver. , 1991, The American journal of physiology.

[45]  Tomer Shlomi,et al.  Glutamine-driven oxidative phosphorylation is a major ATP source in transformed mammalian cells in both normoxia and hypoxia , 2013, Molecular systems biology.

[46]  Keith R.F. Elliott,et al.  Biochemistry, 3rd edn , 1990 .

[47]  Jochen Förster,et al.  Modeling Lactococcus lactis using a genome-scale flux model , 2005, BMC Microbiology.

[48]  Francisco Montero,et al.  Optimization of glycolysis: new discussions , 1999 .

[49]  Ziv Bar-Joseph,et al.  Impact of the solvent capacity constraint on E. coli metabolism , 2008, BMC Systems Biology.

[50]  R. Heinrich,et al.  The Regulation of Cellular Systems , 1996, Springer US.

[51]  M. Archetti Evolutionary dynamics of the Warburg effect: glycolysis as a collective action problem among cancer cells. , 2014, Journal of theoretical biology.

[52]  S. Waley,et al.  A note on the kinetics of multi-enzyme systems. , 1964, The Biochemical journal.

[53]  O. Warburg [Origin of cancer cells]. , 1956, Oncologia.