Individual Confidence-Weighting and Group Decision-Making.

Group-living species frequently pool individual information so as to reach consensus decisions such as when and where to move, or whether a predator is present. Such opinion-pooling has been demonstrated empirically, and theoretical models have been proposed to explain why group decisions are more reliable than individual decisions. Behavioural ecology theory frequently assumes that all individuals have equal decision-making abilities, but decision theory relaxes this assumption and has been tested in human groups. We summarise relevant theory and argue for its applicability to collective animal decisions. We consider selective pressure on confidence-weighting in groups of related and unrelated individuals. We also consider which species and behaviours may provide evidence of confidence-weighting, paying particular attention to the sophisticated vocal communication of cooperative breeders.

[1]  Shmuel Nitzan,et al.  Optimal Decision Rules in Uncertain Dichotomous Choice Situations , 1982 .

[2]  James A. R. Marshall,et al.  Mammalian choices: combining fast-but-inaccurate and slow-but-accurate decision-making systems , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  Guy Cowlishaw,et al.  When to use social information: the advantage of large group size in individual decision making , 2007, Biology Letters.

[4]  Amos Korman,et al.  Confidence Sharing: An Economic Strategy for Efficient Information Flows in Animal Groups , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[5]  M. Manser,et al.  All clear? Meerkats attend to contextual information in close calls to coordinate vigilance , 2011, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[6]  A. Flack,et al.  What are leaders made of? The role of individual experience in determining leader–follower relations in homing pigeons , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  D. Rendall,et al.  Vocal recognition of individuals and kin in free-ranging rhesus monkeys , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  A. Ridley,et al.  Deception by Flexible Alarm Mimicry in an African Bird , 2014, Science.

[9]  R. A. Smith,et al.  Bargaining babblers: vocal negotiation of cooperative behaviour in a social bird , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  Alasdair I Houston,et al.  On evolutionary explanations of cognitive biases. , 2013, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[11]  Christian List,et al.  Democracy in animal groups: a political science perspective. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[12]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Representation of Confidence Associated with a Decision by Neurons in the Parietal Cortex , 2009, Science.

[13]  M. Manser,et al.  The irrelevance of individual discrimination in meerkat alarm calls , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[14]  W. Hamilton.  Geometry for the selfish herd. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[15]  S. Sumner,et al.  Sentinel dominance status influences forager use of social information , 2016 .

[16]  Ralf H. J. M. Kurvers,et al.  Collective Intelligence Meets Medical Decision-Making: The Collective Outperforms the Best Radiologist , 2015, PloS one.

[17]  Andrew N. Radford,et al.  The higher the better: sentinel height influences foraging success in a social bird , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  Nicolas de Condorcet.  Essai Sur L'Application de L'Analyse a la Probabilite Des Decisions Rendues a la Pluralite Des Voix , 2009 .

[19]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[20]  Iain D. Couzin,et al.  Collective Learning and Optimal Consensus Decisions in Social Animal Groups , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[21]  Jean-Louis Deneubourg,et al.  Personality and collective decision-making in foraging herbivores , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  I. Couzin,et al.  Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move , 2005, Nature.

[23]  Andrea Manica,et al.  Evolution of personality differences in leadership , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Marta B Manser,et al.  Moving calls: a vocal mechanism underlying quorum decisions in cohesive groups , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Speed Determines Leadership and Leadership Determines Learning during Pigeon Flocking , 2015, Current Biology.

[26]  Brandon C. Wheeler.  Monkeys crying wolf? Tufted capuchin monkeys use anti-predator calls to usurp resources from conspecifics , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  L. Conradt.  Collective behaviour: When it pays to share decisions , 2011, Nature.

[28]  T. Flower.  Fork-tailed drongos use deceptive mimicked alarm calls to steal food , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  D. Sumpter,et al.  Fast and accurate decisions through collective vigilance in fish shoals , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  James A. R. Marshall,et al.  Optimal Voting in Groups with Convergent Interests , 2011, AAAI Spring Symposium: Modeling Complex Adaptive Systems as if They Were Voting Processes.

[31]  Tim Kovacs,et al.  On optimal decision-making in brains and social insect colonies , 2009, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[32]  R D Sorkin,et al.  Signal-detection analysis of group decision making. , 2001, Psychological review.

[33]  G. Owen,et al.  Thirteen theorems in search of the truth , 1983 .

[34]  Jens Krause,et al.  Why personality differences matter for social functioning and social structure. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[35]  Age Differences in the Responses to Adult and Juvenile Alarm Calls by Bonnet Macaques (Macaca radiata) , 2000 .

[36]  P. Boland.  Majority Systems and the Condorcet Jury Theorem , 1989 .

[37]  Rineke Verbrugge,et al.  A Novel Mechanism for a Survival Advantage of Vigilant Individuals in Groups , 2013, The American Naturalist.

[38]  J. Hare,et al.  The squirrel that cried wolf: reliability detection by juvenile Richardson's ground squirrels (Spermophilus richardsonii) , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[39]  A. Radford,et al.  Individuals in foraging groups may use vocal cues when assessing their need for anti-predator vigilance , 2007, Biology Letters.

[40]  Yoav Freund,et al.  A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting , 1997, EuroCOLT.

[41]  P. Latham,et al.  References and Notes Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S11 References Movie S1 Optimally Interacting Minds R�ports , 2022 .

[42]  A. Radford.  Vocal Coordination of Group Movement by Green Woodhoopoes (Phoeniculus purpureus) , 2004 .

[43]  Jonathan P. Thomas,et al.  The confidence heuristic: A game-theoretic analysis , 1995 .

[44]  Asher Koriat,et al.  When Are Two Heads Better than One and Why? , 2012, Science.

[45]  Hatim A. Zariwala,et al.  Neural correlates, computation and behavioural impact of decision confidence , 2008, Nature.

[46]  Andrew J. King,et al.  Swarm Intelligence in Animal Groups: When Can a Collective Out-Perform an Expert? , 2010, PloS one.

[47]  Sean A. Rands,et al.  Spontaneous emergence of leaders and followers in foraging pairs , 2003, Nature.

[48]  Janice C. Daniel,et al.  Reliability and the adaptive utility of discrimination among alarm callers , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[49]  M. Milinski,et al.  Influence of a predator on the optimal foraging behaviour of sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.) , 1978, Nature.

[50]  A. S. Griffin,et al.  Cognition and personality: an analysis of an emerging field. , 2015, Trends in ecology & evolution.