Cognitive processes in implicit attitude tasks: An experimental validation of the Trip Model

Implicit attitude tasks have become very popular in various areas of psychology. However, little is known about the cognitive processes they involve. To address this issue, we investigated the underlying processes of the Go/No-go Association Task (GNAT), a go/no-go variant of the well-known Implicit Association Test (IAT). More precisely, we tested two alternative multinomial processing tree (MPT) models of GNAT performance, the Trip Model and the generalized Quad Model. Both models assume that GNAT performance is influenced not only by automatic associations but also by response biases and a controlled discrimination process. However, the two models differ with respect to an additional overcoming bias process. In contrast to the Quad Model, the Trip Model assumes that overcoming bias does not play a major role in GNAT performance. Instead, the Trip Model emphasizes the role of response biases. We report three experiments that demonstrate the validity of the Trip Model for GNAT data. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  B. Hilbig,et al.  Multinomial processing tree models: A review of the literature. , 2009 .

[2]  R. Barry,et al.  Development of Inhibitory Processing During the Go/NoGo Task: A Behavioral and Event-Related Potenti , 2005 .

[3]  U. Mayr,et al.  The power of a story: New, automatic associations from a single reading of a short scenario , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  Morten Moshagen,et al.  multiTree: A computer program for the analysis of multinomial processing tree models , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[5]  U. Ansorge,et al.  A response-discrimination account of the Simon effect. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  J. Müsseler,et al.  Where action impairs visual encoding: an event-related fMRI study. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[7]  Timothy R. C. Read,et al.  Goodness-Of-Fit Statistics for Discrete Multivariate Data , 1988 .

[8]  M. Steffens,et al.  Prejudiced or Just Smart?: Intelligence as a Confounding Factor in the IAT Effect , 2010 .

[9]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  Karl Christoph Klauer,et al.  Understanding the role of executive control in the Implicit Association Test: Why flexible people have small IAT effects , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  M. Steffens,et al.  Individuum oder Gruppe, Exemplar oder Kategorie? , 2004 .

[12]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: Effects of response conflict and trial type frequency , 2003, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[13]  W. Prinz,et al.  Response preparation and code overlap in dual tasks , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[14]  Christoph Stahl,et al.  HMMTree: A computer program for latent-class hierarchical multinomial processing tree models , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[15]  W. Hippel,et al.  Bias and regulation of bias in intergroup interactions: Implicit attitudes toward Muslims and interaction quality , 2009 .

[16]  E. Erdfelder,et al.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[17]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  A multitrait-multimethod validation of the Implicit Association Test: implicit and explicit attitudes are related but distinct constructs. , 2007, Experimental psychology.

[18]  G. Glover,et al.  Error‐related brain activation during a Go/NoGo response inhibition task , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[19]  K. Jonas,et al.  Implicit Attitude Measures , 2010 .

[20]  F. Foroni,et al.  Picture-IAT versus Word-IAT: Level of stimulus representation influences on the IAT , 2009 .

[21]  Carla J. Groom,et al.  Separating multiple processes in implicit social cognition: the quad model of implicit task performance. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  Michael A. Olson,et al.  Implicit measures in social cognition. research: their meaning and use. , 2003, Annual review of psychology.

[24]  Jan De Houwer,et al.  The Extrinsic Affective Simon Task. , 2003 .

[25]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[26]  D. Wentura,et al.  The extrinsic affective Simon task as an instrument for indirect assessment of prejudice , 2008 .

[27]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A model of the go/no-go task. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[28]  A. Schütz,et al.  Through a Glass, Less Darkly? , 2008 .

[29]  Carla J. Groom,et al.  The self-regulation of automatic associations and behavioral impulses. , 2008, Psychological review.

[30]  M. Steffens Is the implicit association test immune to faking? , 2004, Experimental psychology.

[31]  U. Ansorge,et al.  Transfer of response codes from choice-response to go/no-go tasks , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[32]  K. C. Klauer Hierarchical Multinomial Processing Tree Models: A Latent-Trait Approach , 2006 .

[33]  K C Klauer,et al.  Unraveling social categorization in the "who said what?" paradigm. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  David M. Riefer,et al.  Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[35]  Christoph Stahl,et al.  Assessing automatic activation of valence: a multinomial model of EAST performance. , 2007, Experimental psychology.

[36]  A. Greenwald,et al.  The Brief Implicit Association Test. , 2009, Experimental psychology.

[37]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  THE GO/NO-GO ASSOCIATION TASK , 2001 .

[38]  D. Vogel,et al.  A public versus private administration of the implicit association test , 2006 .

[39]  K. Gonsalkorale,et al.  Aging and prejudice: Diminished regulation of automatic race bias among older adults , 2009 .