Key variables in technology transfer: A field-study based empirical analysis

Abstract Research and development (R&D) consortia represent a new organizational form which highlights barriers and clarifies solutions to efficient and timely technology transfer. Using interview, archival, and survey data collected on one of the nation's oldest and most prominent R&D consortia, the MCC (Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation), this study refines and contributes to established technology transfer theory by suggesting that four variables—communication interactivity, cultural and geographical distance, technology equivocality, and personal motivation—are central to technology transfer processes within and between organizations. Research hypotheses are presented in terms of a Technology Transfer Grid which depicts different combinations and managerial implications of the four variables.

[1]  William E. Souder,et al.  Managing R&D Consortia for Success , 1990 .

[2]  James W. Botkin,et al.  The New Alliance: America's R&D Consortia , 1988 .

[3]  J. Pfeffer.  Organizations and Organization Theory , 1982 .

[4]  David Wilemon,et al.  A field study of intergroup integration in technology-based organizations , 1991 .

[5]  Robert B. Reich,et al.  The Quiet Path to Technological Preeminence , 1989 .

[6]  Gerald Zaltman,et al.  Innovation and Organizations. , 1974 .

[7]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[8]  Nanette S. Levinson,et al.  R&D management and organizational coupling , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[9]  Tracy Kidder,et al.  Soul of a New Machine , 1981 .

[10]  C. Alderfer,et al.  Studying Intergroup Relations Embedded in Organizations. , 1982 .

[11]  Richard C. Dorf,et al.  Models for commercialization of technology from universities and research laboratories , 1987 .

[12]  James Alvin Jolly,et al.  The manager's role in technology transfer , 1985 .

[13]  C. Argyris,et al.  The applicability of organizational sociology , 1973 .

[14]  Merton J. Peck,et al.  Joint R&D: The case of microelectronics and computer technology corporation , 1986 .

[15]  William E. Souder,et al.  Choosing an R&D Consortium , 1990 .

[16]  Johan P. Olsen,et al.  Ambiguity and choice in organizations , 1976 .

[17]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Communication Networks: Toward a New Paradigm for Research , 1980 .

[18]  James T. Kenny.  Research administration and technology transfer , 1988 .

[19]  Mary Jo Hatch,et al.  Physical Barriers, Task Characteristics, and Interaction Activity in Research and Development Firms , 1987 .

[20]  T. I. Adams,et al.  Government supported industry-university research centers: Issues for successful technology transfer , 1987 .

[21]  C. Avery,et al.  R&D consortia and technology transfer: Initial lessons from MCC , 1989 .

[22]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[23]  B. Turner,et al.  Grounded Theory and Organizational Research , 1986 .

[24]  S. Dornbusch,et al.  Evaluation and the exercise of authority , 1976 .

[25]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Managerial influence in the implementation of new technology , 1988 .

[26]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization , 1988 .

[27]  Douglas K. Smith,et al.  Fumbling the Future: How Xerox Invented, Then Ignored, the First Personal Computer , 1988 .

[28]  W. J. Murphy.  Cooperative action to achieve competitive strategic objectives : a study of the Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation , 1987 .

[29]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[30]  D. V. Gibson,et al.  Technology transfer in multi-organizational environments: the case of R&D consortia , 1991 .

[31]  Henry Mintzberg.  An Emerging Strategy of "Direct" Research , 1979 .

[32]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .