It’s a trap: sampling bias due to animal personality is not always inevitable

Within a population, individuals can often exhibit consistent differences in a range of behaviors across time and context (behavioral type) that are also correlated (behavioral syndrome). Recently, it has been suggested that an individual’s behavioral type can influence its probability of detection and capture during sampling. As a result, certain trapping methods may be inherently biased toward targeting a non-random sample of the population with wide ranging implications—from the way we conduct ecological research to the management and conservation of species. But is sampling bias always inevitable? Currently, studies have focused almost exclusively on the efficacy of passive trapping methods (e.g., baited traps) that rely on the arrival and inspection of animals, where bold, explorative individuals are typically oversampled. Whether more active search strategies result in similar bias remains unclear. In this study, we compared 3 different trapping methods (hand capture, pitfall trapping, and mealworm fishing) in their ability to capture a range of behavioral types within a population of the delicate skink (Lampropholis delicata). We also tested whether a behavioral syndrome was present. Although significant behavioral variation existed within the population, we found no difference between individuals caught in the 3 trapping methods among 5 behavioral traits. However, we did find the presence of a behavioral syndrome, where skinks that were consistently more active, explored an environment faster and were more likely to bask with other skinks. We suggest that trapping bias is not ubiquitous but instead might only be associated with passive trapping methods that involve the response of animals to novelty.

[1]  E. Slade,et al.  The Importance of Microhabitat for Biodiversity Sampling , 2014, PloS one.

[2]  R. Shine,et al.  Does Invasion Success Reflect Superior Cognitive Ability? A Case Study of Two Congeneric Lizard Species (Lampropholis, Scincidae) , 2014, PloS one.

[3]  Kimberley J. Mathot,et al.  Slow explorers take less risk: a problem of sampling bias in ecological studies , 2013 .

[4]  F. Kraus,et al.  Divergent introduction histories among invasive populations of the delicate skink ( Lampropholis delicata): has the importance of genetic admixture in the success of biological invasions been overemphasized? , 2013 .

[5]  D. G. Chapple,et al.  Biosecurity interceptions of an invasive lizard: origin of stowaways and human-assisted spread within New Zealand , 2012, Evolutionary applications.

[6]  P. Biro Are most samples of animals systematically biased? Consistent individual trait differences bias samples despite random sampling , 2012, Oecologia.

[7]  Franz J Weissing,et al.  Animal personalities: consequences for ecology and evolution. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[8]  D. G. Chapple,et al.  Impact of Tail Loss on the Behaviour and Locomotor Performance of Two Sympatric Lampropholis Skink Species , 2012, PloS one.

[9]  R. Heinsohn,et al.  Boldness, trappability and sampling bias in wild lizards , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  A. Sih,et al.  Ecological implications of behavioural syndromes. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[11]  Matthew E. Wolak,et al.  Guidelines for estimating repeatability , 2012 .

[12]  N. Dingemanse,et al.  Don't neglect pre-establishment individual selection in deliberate introductions. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[13]  S. M. Simmonds,et al.  Know when to run, know when to hide: can behavioral differences explain the divergent invasion success of two sympatric lizards? , 2011, Ecology and evolution.

[14]  A. Sih,et al.  Personality-dependent dispersal in the invasive mosquitofish: group composition matters , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  J. Godin,et al.  Capture technique and fish personality: angling targets timid bluegill sunfish, Lepomis macrochirus , 2011 .

[16]  A. Sih,et al.  Social Personality Polymorphism and the Spread of Invasive Species: A Model , 2011, The American Naturalist.

[17]  E. Fernández-Juricic,et al.  Individual variation in behavioural plasticity: direct and indirect effects of boldness, exploration and sociability on habituation to predators in lizards , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  A. Sih,et al.  Personality traits and dispersal tendency in the invasive mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis) , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  D. Réale,et al.  Personality, space use and tick load in an introduced population of Siberian chipmunks Tamias sibiricus. , 2010, The Journal of animal ecology.

[20]  M. Eens,et al.  Behavioural syndromes and trappability in free-living collared flycatchers, Ficedula albicollis , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  Kate L. Laskowski,et al.  The repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[22]  Mollie E. Brooks,et al.  Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[23]  Niels J Dingemanse,et al.  Sampling bias resulting from animal personality. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[24]  D. Réale,et al.  Personality, habitat use, and their consequences for survival in North American red squirrels Tamiasciurus hudsonicus , 2008 .

[25]  J. Stamps,et al.  Are animal personality traits linked to life-history productivity? , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[26]  A. Sih,et al.  Exposure to predation generates personality in threespined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). , 2007, Ecology letters.

[27]  N. Dingemanse,et al.  Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution , 2007, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[28]  J. Clobert,et al.  Social personalities influence natal dispersal in a lizard , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  Andrew Sih,et al.  Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[30]  S. Downes,et al.  Antipredatory behaviour in lizards: interactions between group size and predation risk , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[31]  P. Mather,et al.  Structural Aspects of Microhabitat Selection by the Skink Lampropholis delicata , 2003 .

[32]  R. Shine Effects of pregnancy on locomotor performance: an experimental study on lizards , 2003, Oecologia.

[33]  G. Quinn,et al.  Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists , 2002 .

[34]  Sharon Downes,et al.  TRADING HEAT AND FOOD FOR SAFETY: COSTS OF PREDATOR AVOIDANCE IN A LIZARD , 2001 .

[35]  R. Shine,et al.  WHY DOES TAIL LOSS INCREASE A LIZARD'S LATER VULNERABILITY TO SNAKE PREDATORS? , 2001 .

[36]  L. M. Rogers,et al.  Differences in trappability of European badgers Meles meles in three populations in England , 1999 .

[37]  David Sloan Wilson,et al.  Adaptive individual differences within single populations. , 1998 .

[38]  Donald A. Jackson STOPPING RULES IN PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS ANALYSIS: A COMPARISON OF HEURISTICAL AND STATISTICAL APPROACHES' , 1993 .

[39]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[40]  C. Carere,et al.  Animal personalities matter for biological invasions. , 2013, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[41]  A. Bell Randomized or fixed order for studies of behavioral syndromes? , 2013, Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology.

[42]  S. M. Simmonds,et al.  Can behavioral and personality traits influence the success of unintentional species introductions? , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[43]  D. Wilson,et al.  Shy-bold continuum in pumpkinseed sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus): An ecological study of a psychological trait. , 1993 .