Quantifying the Impact of Connection Policy on Distributed Generation

Increasing connections for distributed generation (DG), and in particular, for wind generation, are being sought in power systems across the world. These increased applications present a significant challenge to the existing connection policies of distribution network operators. In particular, nonfirm access to the network has been proposed as a method to increase the penetration of DG. The impact of the connection policies arising from nonfirm access are investigated in detail here. The Irish system is used as a case study, and with reference to the available energy resource and network parameters, the costs and benefits of DG are determined under a number of planning policies. The costs and benefits assessed include connection and cycling costs along with emissions, capacity value, and fuel bill saving. It is shown that a significant increase in the net benefits of DG is gained if the appropriate connection policy is utilized from the outset, and conversely, significant costs are incurred if ad hoc policies are employed. Furthermore, it is shown that nonfirm access has the scope to facilitate a significant extra amount of DG capacity

[1]  A. R. Wallace,et al.  Planning for Optimal Accommodation of Dispersed Generation in Distribution Networks , 2003 .

[2]  M. O'Malley,et al.  Establishing the role that wind generation may have in future generation portfolios , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[3]  A. Keane,et al.  Optimal allocation of embedded generation on distribution networks , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[4]  A BLUEPRINT TO ACHIEVE 10% OF THE W O R L D’S ELECTRICITY FROM WIND POWER BY 2020 , 1999 .

[5]  M. O'Malley,et al.  A quantitative analysis of the net benefits of grid integrated wind , 2006, 2006 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting.

[6]  M. O'Malley,et al.  Frequency control in competitive electricity market dispatch , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[7]  M. O'Malley,et al.  A new approach to quantify reserve demand in systems with significant installed wind capacity , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[8]  A. Keane,et al.  Optimal distributed generation plant mix with novel loss adjustment factors , 2006, 2006 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting.

[9]  Lennart Söder Reserve margin planning in a wind-hydro-thermal power system , 1993 .

[10]  M. O'Malley,et al.  Wind generation, power system operation, and emissions reduction , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[11]  Helder Leite,et al.  Network voltage controller for distributed generation , 2004 .

[12]  R. Ramakumar,et al.  An approach to quantify the technical benefits of distributed generation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[13]  S. D. Strauss,et al.  Understand what it really costs to cycle fossil-fired units , 1997 .

[14]  Matt Coleman,et al.  Wind power economics , 2005 .

[15]  J.W. Bialek,et al.  Optimal power flow as a tool for fault level-constrained network capacity analysis , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.