Negative BOLD fMRI Response in the Visual Cortex Carries Precise Stimulus-Specific Information

Sustained positive BOLD (blood oxygen level-dependent) activity is employed extensively in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies as evidence for task or stimulus-specific neural responses. However, the presence of sustained negative BOLD activity (i.e., sustained responses that are lower than the fixation baseline) has remained more difficult to interpret. Some studies suggest that it results from local “blood stealing” wherein blood is diverted to neurally active regions without a concomitant change of neural activity in the negative BOLD regions. However, other evidence suggests that negative BOLD is a result of local neural suppression. In both cases, regions of negative BOLD response are usually interpreted as carrying relatively little, if any, stimulus-specific information (hence the predominant reliance on positive BOLD activity in fMRI). Here we show that the negative BOLD response resulting from visual stimulation can carry high information content that is stimulus-specific. Using a general linear model (GLM), we contrasted standard flickering stimuli to a fixation baseline and found regions of the visual cortex that displayed a sustained negative BOLD response, consistent with several previous studies. Within these negative BOLD regions, we compared patterns of fMRI activity generated by flickering Gabors that were systematically shifted in position. As the Gabors were shifted further from each other, the correlation in the spatial pattern of activity across a population of voxels (such as the population of V1 voxels that displayed a negative BOLD response) decreased significantly. Despite the fact that the BOLD signal was significantly negative (lower than fixation baseline), these regions were able to discriminate objects separated by less than 0.5 deg (at ∼10 deg eccentricity). The results suggest that meaningful, stimulus-specific processing occurs even in regions that display a strong negative BOLD response.

[1]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[2]  A. Treisman.  Strategies and models of selective attention. , 1969, Psychological review.

[3]  Suzanne P. McKee,et al.  Integration regions for visual hyperacuity , 1977, Vision Research.

[4]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  S. McKee.  A local mechanism for differential velocity detection , 1981, Vision Research.

[6]  S. McKee,et al.  The detection of motion in the peripheral visual field , 1984, Vision Research.

[7]  Jacob Beck,et al.  Effects of spatial separation and retinal eccentricity on two-dot vernier acuity , 1985, Vision Research.

[8]  R. Watt,et al.  A theory of the primitive spatial code in human vision , 1985, Vision Research.

[9]  R. Desimone,et al.  Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. , 1985, Science.

[10]  S. McKee,et al.  Precise velocity discrimination despite random variations in temporal frequency and contrast , 1986, Vision Research.

[11]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  “Weber's law” for position: Unconfounding the role of separation and eccentricity , 1988, Vision Research.

[12]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Peripheral positional acuity: Retinal and cortical constraints on 2-dot separation discrimination under photopic and scotopic conditions , 1989, Vision Research.

[13]  G. Baylis,et al.  Movement and visual attention: the spotlight metaphor breaks down. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[15]  D. Levi,et al.  Spatial localization without visual references , 1992, Vision Research.

[16]  J W Belliveau,et al.  Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1995, Science.

[17]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[18]  DAVID WHITAKER,et al.  Centroid Analysis Predicts Visual Localization of First- and Second-order Stimuli , 1996, Vision Research.

[19]  E. DeYoe,et al.  Mapping striate and extrastriate visual areas in human cerebral cortex. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  T A Woolsey,et al.  Neuronal units linked to microvascular modules in cerebral cortex: response elements for imaging the brain. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[21]  A. Dale,et al.  Functional Analysis of V3A and Related Areas in Human Visual Cortex , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  D. Levi,et al.  The influence of adaptation on perceived visual location , 1997, Vision Research.

[23]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of spatial selective attention in areas V1, V2, and V4 of macaque visual cortex. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Common Blood Flow Changes across Visual Tasks: II. Decreases in Cerebral Cortex , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  A. Dale,et al.  The Retinotopy of Visual Spatial Attention , 1998, Neuron.

[26]  David Whitaker,et al.  The effect of suprathreshold contrast on stimulus centroid and its implications for the perceived location of objects , 1998, Vision Research.

[27]  A. Dale,et al.  The representation of the ipsilateral visual field in human cerebral cortex. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution , 1998, Nature.

[29]  A. Dale,et al.  Functional analysis of primary visual cortex (V1) in humans. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  E. DeYoe,et al.  A physiological correlate of the 'spotlight' of visual attention , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Increased Activity in Human Visual Cortex during Directed Attention in the Absence of Visual Stimulation , 1999, Neuron.

[32]  D. Somers,et al.  Functional MRI reveals spatially specific attentional modulation in human primary visual cortex. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  S. Ogawa,et al.  An approach to probe some neural systems interaction by functional MRI at neural time scale down to milliseconds. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  A. T. Smith,et al.  Attentional suppression of activity in the human visual cortex , 2000, Neuroreport.

[35]  G L Shulman,et al.  INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:A default mode of brain function , 2001 .

[36]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal , 2001, Nature.

[37]  A. Ishai,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2001, Science.

[38]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  Human Perception of Objects: Early Visual Processing of Spatial Form Defined by Luminance, Color, Texture, Motion, and Binocular Disparity , 2001 .

[39]  A. Shmuel,et al.  Sustained Negative BOLD, Blood Flow and Oxygen Consumption Response and Its Coupling to the Positive Response in the Human Brain , 2002, Neuron.

[40]  J. Maunsell,et al.  The role of attention in visual processing. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[41]  Dae-Shik Kim,et al.  Origin of Negative Blood Oxygenation Level—Dependent fMRI Signals , 2002, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[42]  Jens Schwarzbach,et al.  Attentional inhibition of visual processing in human striate and extrastriate cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[43]  K. D. Singh,et al.  Negative BOLD in the visual cortex: Evidence against blood stealing , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[44]  Notger G. Müller,et al.  The attentional ‘spotlight's’ penumbra: center-surround modulation in striate cortex , 2004, Neuroreport.

[45]  J. Reynolds,et al.  Attentional modulation of visual processing. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[46]  Brian A Wandell,et al.  Visual field map clusters in human cortex , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[47]  Christopher W. Tyler,et al.  Lateral modulation of BOLD activation in unstimulated regions of the human visual cortex , 2005, NeuroImage.

[48]  A. Kleinschmidt,et al.  The attentional field has a Mexican hat distribution , 2005, Vision Research.

[49]  Robert T. Knight,et al.  Top-down Enhancement and Suppression of the Magnitude and Speed of Neural Activity , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[50]  A. Dale,et al.  Coupling of the cortical hemodynamic response to cortical and thalamic neuronal activity. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  Jeffrey W. Cooney,et al.  Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[52]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Negative functional MRI response correlates with decreases in neuronal activity in monkey visual area V1 , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[53]  D. Bressler,et al.  Spatially asymmetric response to moving patterns in the visual cortex: Re-examining the local sign hypothesis , 2007, Vision Research.

[54]  Donald Laming,et al.  Weber's Law , 2008 .