Predicting Cognitive Strategies and Eye Movements in Hierarchical Visual Search

This article advances computational cognitive modeling of visual search, and the synergistic relationship between cognitive modeling and eye tracking. The paper presents cognitive models of the perceptual, cognitive, and motor processing involved in the visual search of a hierarchical layout. Two types of visual layouts are searched: unlabeled layouts in which words are arranged in groups but with no hierarchical organization, and labeled layouts in which each group is given a heading that guides the search. The two types of layouts motivate fundamentally different search strategies. The models are post hoc explanatory models of the search time data and a priori predictive models of the eye movement data. The models are evaluated here based on the eye movement data. The research demonstrates a methodology and provides guidance for predictive cognitive modeling of visual search.

[1]  Anthony J. Hornof,et al.  Cognitive modeling reveals menu search in both random and systematic , 1997, CHI.

[2]  Anthony J. Hornof,et al.  Cognitive modeling demonstrates how people use anticipated location knowledge of menu items , 1999, CHI '99.

[3]  Anthony J. Hornof,et al.  Cognitive strategies and eye movements for searching hierarchical computer displays , 2003, CHI '03.

[4]  Anthony J. Hornof,et al.  Visual search and mouse-pointing in labeled versus unlabeled two-dimensional visual hierarchies , 2001, TCHI.

[5]  Mark O. Riedl,et al.  A perception/action substrate for cognitive modeling in HCI , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[6]  David E. Kieras,et al.  An Overview of the EPIC Architecture for Cognition and Performance With Application to Human-Computer Interaction , 1997, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[7]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Automated Eye-Movement Protocol Analysis , 2001, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[8]  Anthony J. Hornof,et al.  Cognitive Strategies for the Visual Search of Hierarchical Computer Displays , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[9]  Michael E. Atwood,et al.  Project Ernestine: Validating a GOMS Analysis for Predicting and Explaining Real-World Task Performance , 1993, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[10]  Michael D. Byrne,et al.  Modeling icon search in ACT-R/PM , 2002, Cognitive Systems Research.

[11]  Christian D. Schunn,et al.  Fourth International Conference on Cognitive Modeling , 2001 .

[12]  C. Lebiere,et al.  The Atomic Components of Thought , 1998 .

[13]  Tim Halverson,et al.  Cleaning up systematic error in eye-tracking data by using required fixation locations , 2002, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[14]  Allen Newell,et al.  The psychology of human-computer interaction , 1983 .

[15]  Michael D. Byrne,et al.  ACT-R/PM and menu selection: applying a cognitive architecture to HCI , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..