Development of Accident Probability Index Using Surrogate Indicators of Chemical Accidents in Chemical Plants

To reduce damage caused by chemical accidents, it is important to establish a prevention system for chemical accidents. The first step in the prevention of chemical accidents is to screen the high-risk chemical plants. Risk index, one of the screening methods, can indirectly estimate the risk at each chemical plant. For calculating the risk index, the probability of an accident needs to be estimated, which requires complex calculation and confidential data from plants that are difficult to obtain. Therefore, we developed a new index, the accident probability index, to estimate accident probability in chemical plants using readily accessible data. We conducted a literature survey on the existing risk indices and interviewed chemical experts and government chemical managers to select surrogate indicators related to chemical accidents, and four indicators were chosen: hazardous characteristics of chemicals, handling volume, records of accident frequency, and national accident frequency of chemicals. We calculated the accident probability index for 4520 chemical plants, and index value means was 5.324 (95% confidence interval (CI): 3.156, 7.493). An increase by 10 in the index value denoted a 1.06-fold (95% CI: 1.04, 1.08) increase in the odds ratio for actual accident occurrence. The accident frequency of the fourth quartile of the index value was 4.30 times (95% CI: 1.72, 10.75) higher than those of the first quartile.

[1]  G. Jenks.  The Data Model Concept in Statistical Mapping , 1967 .

[2]  B. J. Tyler.  Using the mond index to measure inherent hazards , 1985 .

[3]  Dong-chun Shin,et al.  Development of CRS-Korea II and its Application to Setting the Priority of Toxic Chemicals for Local Provinces , 1986 .

[4]  Ji-Yeon Yang,et al.  Development of Korean Chemical Ranking and Scoring System (CRS-Korea) and its Application to Prioritizing National Toxic Chemicals , 1986 .

[5]  G. Kennedy,et al.  Acute toxicity in the rat following either oral or inhalation exposure. , 1991, Toxicology letters.

[6]  D. W. Edwards,et al.  Chemical process route selection based on assessment of inherent environmental hazard , 1997 .

[7]  Terry W. Schultz,et al.  A screening method for ranking and scoring chemicals by potential human health and environmental impacts , 1997 .

[8]  L. Chappell.  George F. Will , 1997 .

[9]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Accident Hazard Index: A Multi-Attribute Method for Process Industry Hazard Rating , 1997 .

[10]  R. McMaster.  In Memoriam: George F. Jenks (1916-1996) , 1997 .

[11]  A. Wilday,et al.  Index method for cost-effective assessment of risk to the environment from accidental releases , 1998 .

[12]  Åsa Scott.  Environment–accident index: validation of a model , 1998 .

[13]  Shahid Abbas Abbasi,et al.  Multivariate hazard identification and ranking system , 1998 .

[14]  B. Hansen,et al.  Priority setting for existing chemicals: European Union risk ranking method , 1999 .

[15]  J. P. Gupta,et al.  A new Hazardous Waste Index. , 1999, Journal of hazardous materials.

[16]  Anna-Mari Heikkilä,et al.  Inherent safety in process plant design : an index-based approach , 1999 .

[17]  Subir Chowdhury,et al.  The Mahalanobis-taguchi System , 2000 .

[18]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Safety Weighted Hazard Index (SWeHI): A New, User-friendly Tool for Swift yet Comprehensive Hazard Identification and Safety Evaluation in Chemical Process Industrie , 2001 .

[19]  Gilles Dusserre,et al.  Review of 62 risk analysis methodologies of industrial plants , 2002 .

[20]  Rajesh Jugulum,et al.  The Mahalanobis-Taguchi strategy : a pattern technology system , 2002 .

[21]  Seoung Bum Kim,et al.  A Review and Analysis of the Mahalanobis—Taguchi System , 2003, Technometrics.

[22]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Integrated inherent safety index (I2SI): A tool for inherent safety evaluation , 2004 .

[23]  K. Rajeshwar Rao,et al.  Estimation of risk indices of chemicals during transportation , 2004 .

[24]  Å. Andersson.  Development of an Environment-Accident Index : A planning tool to protect the environment in case of a chemical spill , 2004 .

[25]  山上 鋭享.  Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) 化学品の分類および表示に関する世界調和システム , 2007 .

[26]  Michiko Enomoto.  United Nations Publications , 2007 .

[27]  Mahmoud M. El-Halwagi,et al.  The integration of Dow's fire and explosion index (F&EI) into process design and optimization to achieve inherently safer design , 2007 .

[28]  D. W. Edwards,et al.  A New Safety Risk Index for Use in Petrochemical Planning , 2007 .

[29]  D. Drain,et al.  A Comparison of the Mahalanobis-Taguchi System to A Standard Statistical Method for Defect Detection , 2009 .

[30]  Y. An,et al.  Construction of a chemical ranking system of soil pollution substances for screening of priority soil contaminants in Korea , 2012, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[31]  M. Mardani,et al.  A Credit Approach to Measure Inherent Hazards Using the Fire, Explosion and Toxicity Index in the Chemical Process Industry: Case Study of an Iso-max Unit in an Iran Oil Refinery , 2015 .

[32]  Zeynab Sadat Nezamodini,et al.  Fire and explosion risk assessment in a process unit using Dow’s Fire and Explosion Index , 2015 .

[33]  D. Dai.  On high dimensional Mahalanobis distances , 2017 .

[34]  C. Su.  Mahalanobis – Taguchi System and Its Medical Applications , 2017 .

[35]  Sang-Hoon Byeon,et al.  Development of a Screening Method for Health Hazard Ranking and Scoring of Chemicals Using the Mahalanobis–Taguchi System , 2018, International journal of environmental research and public health.