Mapping the institutional capital of high-tech firms: A fuzzy-set analysis of capitalist variety and export performance

We examine how institutional configurations, not single institutions, provide companies with institutional capital. Building on the varieties-of-capitalism approach, it is argued that competitive advantage in high-tech industries with radical innovation may be supported by combinations of certain institutional conditions: lax employment protection, weak collective bargaining coverage, extensive university training, little occupational training, and a large stock market. Furthermore, multinational enterprises engage in “institutional arbitrage”: they allocate their activities so as to benefit from available institutional capital. These hypotheses are tested on country-level data for 19 OECD economies in the period 1990 to 2003. A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis yields several interesting findings. A high share of university graduates and a large stock market are complementary institutions leading to strong export performance in high-tech. Employment protection is neither conducive nor harmful to export performance in high-tech. A high volume of cross-border mergers and acquisitions, as a form of institutional arbitrage leading to knowledge flows, acts as a functional equivalent to institutions that support knowledge production in the home economy. Implications of these findings for theory, policy, and the analysis of firm-level behavior are developed.

[1]  A. Roth,et al.  Cross-border mergers and acquisitions as a tool to transfer knowledge and foster competitive capabilities , 2003 .

[2]  M. Lehrer Macro‐varieties of Capitalism and Micro‐varieties of Strategic Management in European Airlines , 2001 .

[3]  Rudi K. F. Bresser,et al.  Institutional Capital: Competitive Advantage In Light Of The New Institutionalism In Organization Theory , 2003 .

[4]  Ronald Dore,et al.  Stock Market Capitalism: Welfare Capitalism: Japan and Germany Versus the Anglo-Saxons , 2000 .

[5]  Peer C. Fiss A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations , 2007 .

[6]  Jon Kvist,et al.  Fuzzy set ideal type analysis , 2007 .

[7]  Odd Nordhaug,et al.  Human resource management in US subsidiaries in Europe and Australia: centralisation or autonomy? , 2008 .

[8]  B. Lundvall,et al.  Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation , 2007 .

[9]  M. Lehrer,et al.  Can High-technology Industries Prosper in Germany? Institutional Frameworks and the Evolution of the German Software and Biotechnology Industries , 1999 .

[10]  F. Malerba,et al.  Technological Regimes and Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation , 2000 .

[11]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Set Relations in Social Research: Evaluating Their Consistency and Coverage , 2006, Political Analysis.

[12]  Jonas Pontusson,et al.  Wage Inequality and Varieties of Capitalism , 2000, World Politics.

[13]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[14]  John Paul MacDuffie,et al.  Prototypes and strategy: assigning causal credit using fuzzy sets , 2004 .

[15]  G. Redding The thick description and comparison of societal systems of capitalism , 2005 .

[16]  P. McCann,et al.  The Location Behavior of the Multinational Enterprise: Some Analytical Issues , 2004 .

[17]  R. Boyer How and why capitalisms differ , 2005 .

[18]  R. Dore The Distinctiveness of Japan , 1997 .

[19]  Salvador Barrios,et al.  Efficiency spillovers from foreign direct investment in the EU periphery: A comparative study of Greece, Ireland, and Spain , 2004 .

[20]  Gregory Jackson,et al.  Introduction: The Diversity and Change of Corporate Governance in Japan 1 , 2007 .

[21]  P. Hall,et al.  Varieties of Capitalism , 2001 .

[22]  N. Driffield,et al.  The Importance of Clusters for Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment and Technology Sourcing , 2006 .

[23]  M. Porter Clusters and the new economics of competition. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[24]  Matthew M. C. Allen The Varieties of Capitalism Paradigm: Explaining Germany's Comparative Advantage? , 2006 .

[25]  Ben Clift,et al.  Where are national capitalisms now , 2004 .

[26]  Svend-Erik Skaaning Explaining Post-Communist Respect for Civil Liberty: A Multi-Methods Test , 2007 .

[27]  Ronald Dore,et al.  Stock Market Capitalism: Welfare Capitalism , 2000 .

[28]  Jeffrey L. Furman,et al.  The Determinants of National Innovative Capacity , 2000 .

[29]  Marianna Belloc Institutions and International Trade: A Reconsideration of Comparative Advantage , 2006 .

[30]  A. Lewin,et al.  Outward foreign direct investment as escape response to home country institutional constraints , 2007 .

[31]  Witold J. Henisz The Institutional Environment for Multinational Investment , 2000 .

[32]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[33]  Richard Deeg Complementarity and institutional change in capitalist systems , 2007 .

[34]  K. Yamamura,et al.  Varieties of Capitalism: And Then There Was One?@@@Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage@@@The Origins of Nonliberal Capitalism: Germany and Japan in Comparison@@@Models of Capitalism: Growth and Stagnation in the Modern Era , 2003 .

[35]  Orfeo Fioretos The Domestic Sources of Multilateral Preferences: Varieties of Capitalism in the European Community , 2001 .

[36]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Fuzzy Sets and Social Research , 2005 .

[37]  R. Whitley,et al.  Managing competences in entrepreneurial technology firms: a comparative institutional analysis of Germany, Sweden and the UK , 2004 .

[38]  Robert Kaiser,et al.  The reconfiguration of National Innovation Systems—the example of German biotechnology , 2004 .

[39]  C. Crouch Models of capitalism , 2005 .

[40]  David Soskice,et al.  An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism , 2001 .

[41]  B. Carlsson Internationalization of innovation systems: A survey of the literature ☆ , 2006 .

[42]  R. Boyer New growth regimes, but still institutional diversity , 2004 .

[43]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Redesigning social inquiry , 2008 .

[44]  Randy Hodson,et al.  Unions, Solidarity, and Striking , 2004 .

[45]  L. Kenworthy Institutional coherence and macroeconomic performance , 2006 .

[46]  H. Keman,et al.  Do miracles exist? Analyzing economic performance comparatively , 2007 .

[47]  John L. Campbell,et al.  THE VARIETIES OF CAPITALISM AND HYBRID SUCCESS: DENMARK IN THE GLOBAL ECONOMY , 2006 .

[48]  Matthew M. C. Allen,et al.  Can Variation in Public Policies Account for Differences in Comparative Advantage? , 2006, Journal of Public Policy.

[49]  C. Oliver SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: COMBINING INSTITUTIONAL AND RESOURCE- BASED VIEWS , 1997 .

[50]  M. Aoki,et al.  Corporate Governance in Japan. Institutional Change and Organizational Diversity , 2009 .

[51]  B. Amable The Diversity Of Modern Capitalism , 2003 .

[52]  R. Whitley European business systems : firms and markets in their national contexts , 1994 .

[53]  Soo Hee Lee,et al.  Government Policy and Trajectories of Radical Innovation in Dirigiste States: A Comparative Analysis of National Innovation Systems in France and Korea , 2007, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[54]  Matthew M. C. Allen The varieties of capitalism paradigm: not enough variety? , 2004 .

[55]  Richard Whitley,et al.  Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems , 1999 .

[56]  C. Freeman The ‘National System of Innovation’ in historical perspective , 1995 .

[57]  Gary Goertz,et al.  A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research , 2006, Political Analysis.

[58]  A. Tsui,et al.  Configurational Approaches to Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[59]  Richard Deeg,et al.  Comparing capitalisms: understanding institutional diversity and its implications for international business , 2008 .

[60]  Peter A. Hall,et al.  „Spielarten des Kapitalismus“ und institutionelle Komplementaritäten in der Makroökonomie — Eine empirische Analyse , 2004 .

[61]  B. Lundvall Dynamics of Industry and Innovation: Organizations, Networks and Systems National Innovation Systems -analytical Concept and Development Tool National Innovation Systems -analytical Concept and Development Tool National Innovation Systems -analytical Concept and Development Tool , 2022 .

[62]  James E. Coverdill,et al.  Understanding Mills via Mill-type methods: An application of qualitative comparative analysis to a study of labor management in southern textile manufacturing , 1995 .

[63]  Bruno Amable,et al.  Institutional complementarity and diversity of social systems of innovation and production , 2000 .

[64]  Ajai S. Gaur,et al.  Institutional Environments, Staffing Strategies, and Subsidiary Performance , 2007 .

[65]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Fuzzy-Set Social Science , 2001 .

[66]  L. Román The Institutional Environment , 1999 .

[67]  Odd Nordhaug,et al.  National embeddedness and calculative human resource management in US subsidiaries in Europe and Australia , 2006 .

[68]  Thomas Greckhamer,et al.  Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis in Strategic Management Research , 2008 .

[69]  W. Streeck Taking Uncertainty Seriously: Complementarity as a Moving Target , 2004 .

[70]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  Asymmetry of knowledge spillovers between MNCs and host country firms , 2006 .

[71]  E. Strobl,et al.  Multinational Companies and Indigenous Development: An Empirical Analysis , 2002 .

[72]  J. Visser,et al.  When Institutions Matter - Union growth and Decline in Western Europe , 1999 .

[73]  D. North Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance: Economic performance , 1990 .

[74]  P. Hall,et al.  Varieties of Capitalism , 2001 .

[75]  Yoshiro Miwa,et al.  The Fable of the Keiretsu , 2001 .

[76]  J. McGuire,et al.  The persistence and implications of Japanese keiretsu organization , 2003 .

[77]  Fredrick Flyer,et al.  Agglomeration economies, firm heterogeneity, and foreign direct investment in the United States , 2000 .

[78]  Odd Nordhaug,et al.  Institutional and Rational Determinants of Organizational Practices: Human Resource Management in European Firms , 1999 .

[79]  Gregory Jackson,et al.  Employee Representation in the Board Compared: A Fuzzy Sets Analysis of Corporate Governance, Unionism, and Political Institutions , 2005 .

[80]  Brigitte Unger Innovation Systems and Innovative Performance: Voice Systems , 2000 .

[81]  C. Lane National capitalisms and global production networks: an analysis of their interaction in two global industries , 2007 .

[82]  Anand Swaminathan,et al.  Institutions and international business , 2008 .

[83]  Daniel W. Gingerich,et al.  Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional Complementarities in the Political Economy: An Empirical Analysis , 2009, British Journal of Political Science.

[84]  Markus Balzat,et al.  Recent trends in the research on national innovation systems , 2004 .

[85]  Kalle Pajunen,et al.  Institutions and inflows of foreign direct investment: a fuzzy-set analysis , 2008 .

[86]  M. Porter The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[87]  Richard Whitley,et al.  Business Systems and Organizational Capabilities: The Institutional Structuring of Competitive Competences , 2008 .

[88]  Jay Verkuilen,et al.  Assigning Membership in a Fuzzy Set Analysis , 2005 .

[89]  Jon Kvist,et al.  Welfare Reform in the Nordic Countries in the 1990S: Using Fuzzy-Set Theory to Assess Conformity to Ideal Types , 1999 .

[90]  S. Haake National Business Systems and Industry-Specific Competitiveness , 2002 .

[91]  R. Whitley,et al.  Changing capitalisms?: Internationalization, institutional change, and systems of economic organization , 2005 .

[92]  Yi Jiang,et al.  An institution-based view of international business strategy: a focus on emerging economies , 2008 .

[93]  M. Kleiner Intensity of management resistance: understanding the decline of unionization in the private sector , 2001 .

[94]  Mark Harcourt,et al.  The Importance of Employment Protection for Skill Development in Coordinated Market Economies , 2007 .

[95]  Bruce Kogut,et al.  Exploring complexity when diversity is limited: institutional complementarity in theories of rule of law and national systems revisited , 2006 .

[96]  Lucio Baccaro,et al.  Centralized Wage Bargaining and the Celtic Tiger Phenomenon , 2007 .