Reducing Risk through Segmentation, Permutations, Time and Space Exposure, Inverse States, and Separation

The paper features a number of new generic principles for reducing technical risk with a very wide application area. Permutations of interchangeable components/operations in a system can reduce significantly the risk of system failure at no extra cost. Reducing the time of exposure and the space of exposure can also reduce risk significantly. Technical risk can be reduced effectively by introducing inverse states countering negative effects during service. The application of this principle in logistic supply networks leads to a significant reduction of the risk of congestion and delays. The associated reduction of transportation costs and environmental pollution has the potential to save billions of dollars to the world economy. Separation is a risk-reduction principle which is very efficient in the cases of separating functions to be carried out by different components and for blocking out a common cause. Segmentation is a generic principle for risk reduction which is particularly efficient in reducing the load distribution, vulnerability to a single failure, the hazard potential and damage escalation.

[1]  Michael Todinov,et al.  Risk-Based Reliability Analysis and Generic Principles for Risk Reduction , 2006 .

[2]  G. S. Alʹtshuller,et al.  And Suddenly the Inventor Appeared: TRIZ, the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving , 1996 .

[3]  D. R. Fulkerson,et al.  Maximal Flow Through a Network , 1956 .

[4]  Eliahu Zahavi,et al.  Fatigue Design: Life Expectancy of Machine Parts , 1996 .

[5]  Daniel R. Eno Practical Reliability Engineering, 4th Ed. , 2003 .

[6]  A. Niku-Lari First International Conference on Shot Peening : Paris, 14-17 September 1981 = Première Conférence internationale sur le grenaillage de précontrainte , 1982 .

[7]  T. Anderson,et al.  Fracture mechanics - Fundamentals and applications , 2017 .

[8]  Charles E Ebeling,et al.  An Introduction to Reliability and Maintainability Engineering , 1996 .

[9]  T. Bedford,et al.  Probabilistic Risk Analysis: Foundations and Methods , 2001 .

[10]  R. Ramakumar Engineering Reliability: Fundamentals and Applications , 1996 .

[11]  Michael T. Todinov Reliability governed by the relative locations of random variables following a homogeneous Poisson Process in a finite domain , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[12]  Elmer E Lewis,et al.  Introduction To Reliability Engineering , 1987 .

[13]  F. Hauser,et al.  Deformation and Fracture Mechanics of Engineering Materials , 1976 .

[14]  D. Vose Risk Analysis: A Quantitative Guide , 2000 .

[15]  G. C. Bird,et al.  The effect of peening-shot size on the performance of carbon-steel springs , 1984 .

[16]  Balbir S. Dhillon,et al.  Engineering reliability : new techniques and applications , 1981 .

[17]  G. Altshuller Creativity as an exact science : the theory of the solution of inventive problems , 1984 .

[18]  T. Aven Foundations of risk analysis , 2003 .

[19]  Michael Joseph French,et al.  Conceptual Design for Engineers , 1985 .