Driver’s Cognitive Workload and Driving Performance under Traffic Sign Information Exposure in Complex Environments: A Case Study of the Highways in China

Complex traffic situations and high driving workload are the leading contributing factors to traffic crashes. There is a strong correlation between driving performance and driving workload, such as visual workload from traffic signs on highway off-ramps. This study aimed to evaluate traffic safety by analyzing drivers’ behavior and performance under the cognitive workload in complex environment areas. First, the driving workload of drivers was tested based on traffic signs with different quantities of information. Forty-four drivers were recruited to conduct a traffic sign cognition experiment under static controlled environment conditions. Different complex traffic signs were used for applying the cognitive workload. The static experiment results reveal that workload is highly related to the amount of information on traffic signs and reaction time increases with the information grade, while driving experience and gender effect are not significant. This shows that the cognitive workload of subsequent driving experiments can be controlled by the amount of information on traffic signs; Second, driving characteristics and driving performance were analyzed under different secondary task driving workload levels using a driving simulator. Drivers were required to drive at the required speed on a designed highway off-ramp scene. The cognitive workload was controlled by reading traffic signs with different information, which were divided into four levels. Drivers had to make choices by pushing buttons after reading traffic signs. Meanwhile, the driving performance information was recorded. Questionnaires on objective workload were collected right after each driving task. The results show that speed maintenance and lane deviations are significantly different under different levels of cognitive workload, and the effects of driving experience and gender groups are significant. The research results can be used to analyze traffic safety in highway environments, while considering more drivers’ cognitive and driving performance.

[1]  Jian Rong,et al.  Driver's Visual Cognition Behaviors of Traffic Signs Based on Eye Movement Parameters , 2011 .

[2]  Salaheddine Bendak,et al.  The role of roadside advertising signs in distracting drivers. , 2010 .

[3]  Rongwei Fu,et al.  Fixation distribution of driver while driving through passageways with different widths , 2006 .

[4]  Zhongyin Guo,et al.  The Expressway Traffic Sign Information Volume Threshold and AGS Position Based on Driving Behaviour , 2016 .

[5]  George J Andersen,et al.  The effects of age and workload on 3D spatial attention in dual-task driving. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  Sherrilene Classen,et al.  Gender differences among older drivers in a comprehensive driving evaluation. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Qiang Fu,et al.  Study on the Reaction Time for Road Traffic Signs Information Volume , 2013 .

[8]  Xiaomeng Li,et al.  Effects of fog, driver experience and gender on driving behavior on S-curved road segments. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  Jason S. McCarley,et al.  Lane Keeping Under Cognitive Load , 2014, Hum. Factors.

[10]  Kevin Grove,et al.  Compensatory Behavior of Drivers When Conversing on a Cell Phone , 2014 .

[11]  Mark Vollrath,et al.  The effect of visual and cognitive distraction on driver’s anticipation in a simulated car following scenario , 2011 .

[12]  Fu Qiang,et al.  Analysis traffic safety for highway off-rampbased on visual reaction time on traffic signs , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Transportation Information and Safety (ICTIS).

[13]  Grazia La Cava,et al.  Actual driving data analysis for design consistency evaluation , 2005 .

[14]  Salvatore Cafiso,et al.  Driving Performance, Alignment Consistency, and Road Safety , 2009 .

[15]  Dick de Waard,et al.  Monitoring drivers' mental workload in driving simulators using physiological measures. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  Saskia de Craen,et al.  The development of a method to measure speed adaptation to traffic complexity: identifying novice, unsafe, and overconfident drivers. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  Jean Underwood,et al.  Visual attention while driving: sequences of eye fixations made by experienced and novice drivers , 2003, Ergonomics.

[18]  Aashto,et al.  A Policy on geometric desing of highways and streets. , 1984 .

[19]  Sirpa Rajalin,et al.  Comparison of young male and female drivers' attitude and self-reported traffic behaviour in Finland in 1978 and 2001. , 2003, Journal of safety research.

[20]  Normand Teasdale,et al.  Mental workload when driving in a simulator: effects of age and driving complexity. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  Catherine Berthelon,et al.  Mental workload and driving , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[22]  Yili Liu,et al.  Concurrent processing of vehicle lane keeping and speech comprehension tasks. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[23]  Yang Yang,et al.  Safety of Driving Behavior on Low-Volume Roads in China , 2011 .

[24]  Yung-Ching Liu.  A simulated study on the effects of information volume on traffic signs, viewing strategies and sign familiarity upon driver's visual search performance , 2005 .

[25]  W J Horrey,et al.  Dissociation between driving performance and drivers' subjective estimates of performance and workload in dual-task conditions. , 2009, Journal of safety research.

[26]  Simone Benedetto,et al.  Driver workload and eye blink duration , 2011 .

[27]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  Dynamic Maximum Speed Limits , 2012 .

[28]  Mowei Shen,et al.  Modeling the development of vehicle lateral control skills in a cognitive architecture , 2015 .

[29]  K A Brookhuis,et al.  The effects of mobile telephoning on driving performance. , 1991, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[30]  M. Wogalter,et al.  The influence of time stress and location on behavioral warning compliance , 1998 .

[31]  Yang Liu,et al.  Effects of foggy conditions on drivers’ speed control behaviors at different risk levels , 2014 .

[32]  Jessica Edquist,et al.  The effects of on-street parking and road environment visual complexity on travel speed and reaction time. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[33]  Dario D. Salvucci.  Modeling Driver Behavior in a Cognitive Architecture , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[34]  Wang Fang.  A Study on Maximum Quantity of Information for Different Kind of Direction Signs Based on Information Searching Time , 2011 .

[35]  Nicholas Roy,et al.  The impact of a naturalistic hands-free cellular phone task on heart rate and simulated driving performance in two age groups , 2011 .

[36]  Kay Fitzpatrick,et al.  Driver Performance at High Speeds Using a Simulator , 2012 .

[37]  Jan Törnros,et al.  Mobile phone use – effects of conversation on mental workload and driving speed in rural and urban environments , 2006 .

[38]  Albert Kircher,et al.  Driver experience and cognitive workload in different traffic environments. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[39]  A. Maldonado,et al.  Risk behaviour and mental workload: Multimodal assessment techniques applied to motorbike riding simulation , 2009 .

[40]  N. Gregersen,et al.  A Comparison of Eye Movement Behavior of Inexperienced and Experienced Drivers in Real Traffic Environments , 2005, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.