Reasoning From Double Conditionals: The Effects of Logical Structure and Believability

We report three experimental studies of reasoning with double conditionals, i.e. problems based on premises of the form: If A then B. If B then C. where A, B, and C, describe everyday events. We manipulated both the logical structure of the problems, using all four possible arrangements (or “figures” of their constituents, A, B, and C, and the believability of the two salient conditional conclusions that might follow from them, i.e. If A then C, or If C then A. The experiments showed that with figures for which there was a valid conclusion, the participants more often, and more rapidly, drew the valid conclusion when it was believable than when it was unbelievable. With figures for which there were no valid conclusions, the participants tended to draw whichever of the two conclusions was believable. These results were predicted by the theory that reasoning depends on constructing mental models of the premises.

[1]  Louis S. Dickstein,et al.  Conversion and possibility in syllogistic reasoning , 1981 .

[2]  J. Deutsch.  Perception and Communication , 1958, Nature.

[3]  Jonathan S. Evans,et al.  Bias in human reasoning , 1990 .

[4]  M. Braine,et al.  A Theory of If: A Lexical Entry, Reasoning Program, and Pragmatic Principles , 1991 .

[5]  Jonathan Evans,et al.  The source of belief bias effects in syllogistic reasoning , 1992, Cognition.

[6]  Miriam Frances Dunn,et al.  The Psychology of Reasoning , 1900, Nature.

[7]  Un estudio sobre el efecto de la figura en el razonamiento silogístico , 1982 .

[8]  Philip N. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Illusory inferences about probabilities , 1996 .

[9]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Believability and syllogistic reasoning , 1989, Cognition.

[10]  Louis S. Dickstein,et al.  The effect of figure on syllogistic reasoning , 1978 .

[11]  Michael L. Geis,et al.  On Invited Inferences , 1971 .

[12]  Mary Henle,et al.  The Influence of Attitudes on Syllogistic Reasoning , 1956 .

[13]  J. L. Barston,et al.  AN INVESTIGATION INTO BELIEF BIASES IN REASONING , 1986 .

[14]  L. Rips.  The Psychology of Proof: Deductive Reasoning in Human Thinking , 1994 .

[15]  Jonathan Evans,et al.  Human Reasoning: The Psychology Of Deduction , 1993 .

[16]  P. Pollard,et al.  On the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[17]  Louis S. Dickstein.  Inference errors in deductive reasoning , 1980 .

[18]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  The psychology of syllogisms , 1978, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  Philip N. Johnson-Laird,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology the Effects of Belief on the Spontaneous Production of Syllogistic Conclusions , 2022 .

[20]  G. Boolos.  On ‘syllogistic inference’ , 1984, Cognition.

[21]  R. Revlin,et al.  The effect of personal biases on syllogistic reasoning: Rational decisions from personalized representations , 1978 .

[22]  S. Amano,et al.  Psychology of Reasoning , 1923 .

[23]  Jonathan Evans,et al.  Rationality and reasoning , 1996 .