Quantized Control Allocation of Reaction Control Jets and Aerodynamic Control Surfaces

Amixed-integer linear programming approach tomixing continuous andpulsed control effectors is proposed. The method is aimed at applications involving reentry vehicles that are transitioning from exoatmospheric flight to endoatmospheric flight. In this flight phase, aerodynamic surfaces are weak and easily saturated, and vehicles typically rely on pulsed reaction control jets for attitude control. Control laws for these jets have historically been designed using single-axis phase-plane analysis, which has proven to be sufficient formany applications wheremultiaxis coupling is insignificant and when failures have not been encountered. Here, we propose using a mixed-integer linear programming technique to blend continuous control effectors and pulsed jets to generate moments commanded by linear or nonlinear control laws. When coupled with fault detection and isolation logic, the control effectors can be reconfigured to minimize the impact of control effector failures or damage. When the continuous effectors can provide the desired moments, standard linear programming methods can be used to mix the effectors; however, when the pulsed effectors must be used to augment the aerodynamic surfaces, mixed-integer linear programming techniques are used to determine the optimal combination of jets to fire. The reaction jet control allocator acts as a nonuniformquantizer that applies amoment vector to the vehicle, which approximates the desired moment generated by a continuous control law. Lyapunov theory is applied to develop amethod for determining the region of attraction associated with a quantized vehicle attitude control system.

[1]  Daniel Liberzon,et al.  Quantized feedback stabilization of linear systems , 2000, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[2]  Eric M. Queen,et al.  Entry Vehicle Control System Design for the Mars Science Laboratory , 2006 .

[3]  John Valasek,et al.  Fault‐tolerant control allocation for Mars entry vehicle using adaptive control , 2011 .

[4]  Marc Bodson,et al.  Evaluation of optimization methods for control allocation , 2001 .

[5]  Bruce A. Francis,et al.  Stabilizing a linear system by switching control with dwell time , 2002, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[6]  D. Enns CONTROL ALLOCATION APPROACHES , 1998 .

[7]  E. T. Kubiak,et al.  A frequency domain stability analysis of a phase plane control system. [for Space Shuttle on-orbit flight] , 1984 .

[8]  Joseph A. Paradiso,et al.  Adaptable method of managing jets and aerosurfaces for aerospace vehicle control , 1991 .

[9]  M. Bolender,et al.  Nonlinear Control Allocation Using Piecewise Linear Functions , 2003 .

[10]  David B. Doman,et al.  Integrated Adaptive Guidance and Control for Re-Entry Vehicles with Flight-Test Results , 2004 .

[11]  Philip David Hattis Qualitative differences between Shuttle on-orbit and transition control. [for Space Shuttle , 1984 .

[12]  D.B. Doman,et al.  Control Allocation for Over-actuated Systems , 2006, 2006 14th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation.

[13]  Daniel Liberzon,et al.  Quantized control via locational optimization , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.