Exploring variation in economic, environmental and societal performance among Dutch fattening pig farms

Abstract Sustainable production of pork requires farms that are economically viable, ecologically sound and socially acceptable, both now and in the future. Promising mitigation options to improve the integrated sustainability of a pig farm can be deduced from variation in their economic, environmental and societal performance. This study explores the variation in sustainability performance among 27 specialized fattening pig farms in the Dutch Farm Accountancy Data Network. Moreover, the combined sustainability performance is quantified, in order to identify the characteristics of best performing farms. To quantify the economic performance we used the net farm income (NFI) and labor productivity. With a life cycle assessment (LCA) the environmental performance was quantified for land occupation (LO), non-renewable energy use (NREU), global warming potential (GWP), eutrophication potential (EP) and acidification potential (AP). To quantify the societal performance the usage of antibiotics and the pig mortality rate were used. The average NFI was −€3.1 per 100 kg slaughtered weight (SW), produced with a labor productivity of 0.4 h per 100 kg SW. To produce 100 kg of SW, a total LO and NREU were needed of respectively 1121 m 2 and 2802 MJ. GWP was 546 kg CO 2 -eq per 100 kg SW, of which 31% CO 2 , 7% from CH 4 , and 62% from N 2 O. Total EP was 61.4 kg NO 3 − -eq/100 kg SW, of which 53% from leaching of nitrate and 23% from phosphate. Total AP was 5.3 kg SO 2 -eq per 100 kg SW, of which 79% NH 3 , 11% from NO x and 10% from SO 2 . The use of antibiotics per 100 kg SW averaged 18.9 daily dosages per animal year. The number of deceased pigs per 100 kg SW averaged 0.03. There is a high variation in economic, environmental and societal performance among fattening pig farms. Farm characteristics related to scale positively affect economic and environmental performance. A low feed intake and a feeding ration with a high share of wet by-products positively affect the environmental performance. To identify explanatory farm characteristics from FADN for societal performance, more suitable indicators are needed. Best performing farms, which outperform on economic, environmental and societal performance do exist and are on average larger and are feeding a higher proportion of by-products. To understand the characteristics of an integrative sustainable fattening pig farm, more insight is needed in the entrepreneurial characteristics and the drivers to manage and perform in a more profitable, environmental friendly and societally acceptable way.

[1]  C. Basset-Mens,et al.  Scenario-based environmental assessment of farming systems: the case of pig production in France , 2005 .

[2]  D. Horne,et al.  COMPARISONS BETWEEN ORGANIC & CONVENTIONAL PASTORAL DAIRY FARMING SYSTEMS: COST OF PRODUCTION AND PROFITABILITY , 2009 .

[3]  Ruud B.M. Huirne,et al.  Development and application of a multi-attribute sustainability function for Dutch dairy farming systems , 2006 .

[4]  C. M. Groenestein,et al.  Ammoniakemissie uit dierlijke mest en kunstmest, 1990-2008 : berekeningen met het Nationaal emissiemodel voor Ammoniak (NEMA) , 2011 .

[5]  M. D. Vries,et al.  Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: A review of life cycle assessments , 2010 .

[6]  N. Bondt,et al.  Antibioticagebruik op melkvee-, varkens- en pluimveebedrijven in Nederland : gebruik in 2007 in vergelijking met voorgaande jaren , 2009 .

[7]  H Mollenhorst,et al.  On-farm quantification of sustainability indicators: an application to egg production systems , 2006, British poultry science.

[8]  Frank Nevens,et al.  MOTIFS: a monitoring tool for integrated farm sustainability , 2008, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[9]  S. Schneider,et al.  Climate Change 2007 Synthesis report , 2008 .

[10]  E. ten Pierick,et al.  Milieueffecten van Nederlandse consumptie van eiwitrijke producten : gevolgen van vervanging van dierlijke eiwitten anno 2008 , 2008 .

[11]  K. Poppe Economic assessment of Dutch agricultural research , 2008 .

[12]  H. Bartussek,et al.  A review of the animal needs index (ANI) for the assessment of animals’ well-being in the housing systems for Austrian proprietary products and legislation , 1999 .

[13]  R. Lyman Ott.,et al.  An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis , 1977 .

[14]  E. V. van Ierland,et al.  Protein Chains and Environmental Pressures: A Comparison of Pork and Novel Protein Foods , 2004 .

[15]  R. Heijungs,et al.  Environmental life cycle assessment of products , 1992 .

[16]  C. B. Gupta An Introduction to Statistical Methods , 2004 .

[17]  K. Balcombe,et al.  Productivity change in Polish agriculture: an illustration of a bootstrapping procedure applied to Malmquist indices , 2008 .

[18]  Christel Faes,et al.  Development of statistical methods for the evaluation of data on antimicrobial resistance in bacterial isolates from animals and food , 2011 .

[19]  I J M de Boer,et al.  A method using sustainability indicators to compare conventional and animal-friendly egg production systems. , 2002, Poultry science.

[20]  G. J. Monteny,et al.  Forfaitaire waarden voor gasvormige stikstofverliezen uit stallen en mestopslagen; gew. druk , 2000 .

[21]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Attributional and consequential LCA of milk production , 2008 .

[22]  H. Mollenhorst,et al.  Identifying Sustainability Issues Using Participatory SWOT Analysis , 2004 .

[23]  I.J.M. de Boer,et al.  Relating life cycle assessment indicators to gross value added for Dutch dairy farms , 2009 .

[24]  C. B. Baker,et al.  Financial management in agriculture. , 1973 .

[25]  R. Freeman LABOUR PRODUCTIVITY INDICATORS COMPARISON OF TWO OECD DATABASES PRODUCTIVITY DIFFERENTIALS & THE BALASSA-SAMUELSON EFFECT , 2008 .

[26]  F. Offermann,et al.  Estimation of Commodity Specific Production Costs Using German Farm Accountancy Data , 2011 .

[27]  P. Sandøe,et al.  Assessment of Farm Animal Welfare at Herd Level: Many Goals, Many Methods , 2001 .

[28]  I. D. Boer,et al.  Ecological and economic evaluation of Dutch egg production systems , 2011 .

[29]  H. Whay,et al.  Welfare assessment: indices from clinical observation , 2004, Animal Welfare.

[30]  Ruud B.M. Huirne,et al.  Identifying and ranking attributes that determine sustainability in Dutch dairy farming , 2005 .

[31]  R. Heijungs,et al.  Environmental life cycle assessment of products : guide and backgrounds (Part 1) , 1992 .

[32]  S. Edwards,et al.  Preliminary evaluation of a prototype welfare monitoring system for sows and piglets (Welfare Quality® project) , 2009, Animal Welfare.

[33]  Agricultural Profits and Farm Household Wealth: A Farm-level Analysis Using Repeated Cross Sections , 2009, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[34]  Ruud B.M. Huirne,et al.  Maximising sustainability of Dutch dairy farming systems for different stakeholders: A modelling approach , 2008 .