LiDAR from drones employed for mapping archaeology – Potential, benefits and challenges

Although the use of both drones and LiDAR (light detection and ranging) has become common in archaeology in recent years, LiDAR scanning from drones is still in its infancy. The technological development related to drones as well as laser scanner instruments has gradually reached the point where these can be integrated. In this paper we present the results from a test where the applicability of LiDAR used from a drone was studied. The study had two objectives – both based on comparative studies: (i) whether LiDAR from drones represents an improvement in terms of detection success; and (ii) whether LiDAR from drones can increase the quality of the documentation of archaeological features and their physical properties based on remote sensing. A modest improvement of detection success was found, but was not as convincing as one would perhaps expect given the relatively large increase in terms of ground points. This has led us to the conclusion that very dense vegetation obstructs laser beams from reaching all the way to the bare earth. As regards accuracy in documenting archaeological features, the study showed more significant improvements. The last part of the paper is dedicated to a discussion of the pros and cons of using LiDAR from drones compared to conventional airborne laser scanning from aeroplanes or helicopters. The main advantages concern flexibility, low flight altitude and small laser footprint as well as the advantages of a far‐reaching field of view. The disadvantages are related to price, battery capacity, size of area and especially the requirement of line of sight between the drone operator and the drone, a fact that restricts the efficiency in terms of mapping large areas. Nevertheless, the final conclusion is that LiDAR from drones has the potential to make a substantial improvement to archaeological remote sensing.

[1]  Antonio Palucci,et al.  INTEGRATION OF TWO LIDAR FLUOROSENSOR PAYLOADS IN SUBMARINE ROV AND FLYING UAV PLATFORMS , 2004 .

[2]  S. Crutchley,et al.  New light on an ancient landscape: lidar survey in the Stonehenge World Heritage Site , 2005, Antiquity.

[3]  B. Devereux,et al.  Woodland vegetation and its implications for archaeological survey using LiDAR , 2007 .

[4]  C. Briese,et al.  Archaeological prospection of forested areas using full-waveform airborne laser scanning , 2008 .

[5]  Martin Charlton,et al.  Issues in Laser Scanning , 2009 .

[6]  Arko Lucieer,et al.  Development of a UAV-LiDAR System with Application to Forest Inventory , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[7]  Liviu Theodor Ene,et al.  Using airborne small-footprint laser scanner data for detection of cultural remains in forests: an experimental study of the effects of pulse density and DTM smoothing , 2012 .

[8]  Ross A. Hill,et al.  A Comparison of Visualization Techniques for Models Created from Airborne Laser Scanned Data , 2012 .

[9]  Keith Challis,et al.  The role of lidar intensity data in interpreting environmental and cultural archaeological landscapes , 2013 .

[10]  E. Næsset,et al.  Interpreting cultural remains in airborne laser scanning generated digital terrain models: effects of size and shape on detection success rates , 2013 .

[11]  Dave Cowley,et al.  The data explosion: tackling the taboo of automatic feature recognition in airborne survey data , 2014, Antiquity.

[12]  Markus Hollaus,et al.  First examples from the RIEGL VUX-SYS for forestry applications , 2015 .

[13]  Žiga Kokalj,et al.  Airborne laser scanning raster data visualization , 2017 .

[14]  S. Campana Drones in Archaeology. State‐of‐the‐art and Future Perspectives , 2017 .