Two interpretations of the discrimination parameter

In this paper we propose two interpretations for the discrimination parameter in the two-parameter logistic model (2PLM). The interpretations are based on the relation between the 2PLM and two stochastic models. In the first interpretation, the 2PLM is linked to a diffusion model so that the probability of absorption equals the 2PLM. The discrimination parameter is the distance between the two absorbing boundaries and therefore the amount of information that has to be collected before a response to an item can be given. For the second interpretation, the 2PLM is connected to a specific type of race model. In the race model, the discrimination parameter is inversely related to the dependency of the information used in the decision process. Extended versions of both models with person-to-person variability in the difficulty parameter are considered. When fitted to a data set, it is shown that a generalization of the race model that allows for dependency between choices and response times (RTs) is the best-fitting model.

[1]  M. R. Novick,et al.  Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. , 1971 .

[2]  Mark Von Tress,et al.  Generalized, Linear, and Mixed Models , 2003, Technometrics.

[3]  D. Stram,et al.  Variance components testing in the longitudinal mixed effects model. , 1994, Biometrics.

[4]  F. Tuerlinckx.  The efficient computation of the cumulative distribution and probability density functions in the diffusion model , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[5]  Hirotugu Akaike,et al.  On entropy maximization principle , 1977 .

[6]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  Grice-representability of response time distribution families , 1993 .

[7]  Robert S. Wyer,et al.  The mental representation of trait and autobiographical knowledge about the self , 1993 .

[8]  L. R. Goldberg,et al.  Category breadth and hierarchical structure in personality: studies of asymmetries in judgments of trait implications. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Modeling Response Times for Two-Choice Decisions , 1998 .

[10]  R. L. Ebel,et al.  Essentials of educational measurement , 1972 .

[11]  Denny Borsboom,et al.  The attack of the psychometricians , 2006, Psychometrika.

[12]  G R Grice,et al.  Stimulus intensity and response evocation. , 1968, Psychological review.

[13]  Kenneth H. Craik,et al.  The Act Frequency Approach to Personality , 1983 .

[14]  J. Gregory Trafton,et al.  Use of Exemplars and Abstractions in Trait Judgments: A Model of Trait Knowledge About the Self and Others , 1992 .

[15]  G. Schwarz.  Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[16]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[17]  Susan E. Embretson,et al.  Generating items during testing: Psychometric issues and models , 1999 .

[18]  P. Hougaard.  Survival models for heterogeneous populations derived from stable distributions , 1986 .

[19]  Diederich,et al.  Dynamic Stochastic Models for Decision Making under Time Constraints , 1997, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[20]  Hans Colonius,et al.  The “horse race” random utility model for choice probabilities and reaction times, and its competing risks interpretation , 1992 .

[21]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time. , 1999, Psychological review.

[22]  A. Agresti.  Categorical data analysis , 1993 .

[23]  I. W. Molenaar,et al.  Rasch models: foundations, recent developments and applications , 1995 .

[24]  Satishs Iyengar,et al.  Multivariate Models and Dependence Concepts , 1998 .

[25]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[26]  J. Naylor,et al.  Applications of a Method for the Efficient Computation of Posterior Distributions , 1982 .

[27]  Grice Gr,et al.  Stimulus intensity and response evocation. , 1968 .

[28]  R. Ratcliff.  Theoretical interpretations of the speed and accuracy of positive and negative responses. , 1985, Psychological review.

[29]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: Approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[30]  J. Townsend,et al.  Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. , 1993, Psychological review.

[31]  P. Hougaard.  A class of multivanate failure time distributions , 1986 .

[32]  David R. Cox,et al.  The Theory of Stochastic Processes , 1967, The Mathematical Gazette.

[33]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization , 1986 .

[34]  H. Colonius.  A new interpretation of stochastic test models , 1981 .

[35]  David R. Cox,et al.  The Theory of Stochastic Processes , 1967, The Mathematical Gazette.