The Influence of Framing on Risky Decisions: A Meta-analysis.

In framing studies, logically equivalent choice situations are differently described and the resulting preferences are studied. A meta-analysis of framing effects is presented for risky choice problems which are framed either as gains or as losses. This evaluates the finding that highlighting the positive aspects of formally identical problems does lead to risk aversion and that highlighting their equivalent negative aspects does lead to risk seeking. Based on a data pool of 136 empirical papers that reported framing experiments with nearly 30,000 participants, we calculated 230 effect sizes. Results show that the overall framing effect between conditions is of small to moderate size and that profound differences exist between research designs. Potentially relevant characteristics were coded for each study. The most important characteristics were whether framing is manipulated by changing reference points or by manipulating outcome salience, and response mode (choice vs. rating/judgment). Further important characteristics were whether options differ qualitatively or quantitatively in risk, whether there is one or multiple risky events, whether framing is manipulated by gain/loss or by task-responsive wording, whether dependent variables are measured between- or within- subjects, and problem domains. Sample (students vs. target populations) and unit of analysis (individual vs. group) was not influential. It is concluded that framing is a reliable phenomenon, but that outcome salience manipulations, which constitute a considerable amount of work, have to be distinguished from reference point manipulations and that procedural features of experimental settings have a considerable effect on effect sizes in framing experiments. Copyright 1998 Academic Press.

[1]  L. J. Savage,et al.  The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk , 1948, Journal of Political Economy.

[2]  H. Markowitz The Utility of Wealth , 1952, Journal of Political Economy.

[3]  P. Fishburn Mean-Risk Analysis with Risk Associated with Below-Target Returns , 1977 .

[4]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[5]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[6]  R. Rosenthal The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results , 1979 .

[7]  P. Fishburn,et al.  TWO‐PIECE VON NEUMANN‐MORGENSTERN UTILITY FUNCTIONS* , 1979 .

[8]  John W. Payne,et al.  Translation of Gambles and Aspiration Level Effects in Risky Choice Behavior , 1980 .

[9]  P. Schoemaker,et al.  Prospect theory's reflection hypothesis: A critical examination , 1980 .

[10]  G. Dickson A Comparison of Attitudes Towards Risk Among Business Managers , 1981 .

[11]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. , 1981 .

[12]  H. Sox,et al.  Assessment of Patients' Preferences for Therapeutic Outcomes , 1981, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[13]  G. Glass,et al.  Meta-analysis in social research , 1981 .

[14]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[15]  A. Tversky,et al.  On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. , 1982, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  D. Rubin,et al.  Comparing Effect Sizes of Independent Studies , 1982 .

[17]  A. Tversky,et al.  The Psychology of Preferences , 1982 .

[18]  A test of prospect theory , 1983 .

[19]  Roman Krzysztofowicz,et al.  Strength of preference and risk attitude in utility measurement , 1983 .

[20]  John W. Payne,et al.  Multiattribute Risky Choice Behavior: The Editing of Complex Prospects , 1984 .

[21]  R. Rosenthal Meta-analytic procedures for social research , 1984 .

[22]  M. Bazerman,et al.  The Effects of Framing and Negotiator Overconfidence on Bargaining Behaviors and Outcomes , 1985 .

[23]  N. Boyd,et al.  Eliciting Preferences for Alternative Cancer Drug Treatments , 1985, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[24]  S. Carey Conceptual Change in Childhood , 1985 .

[25]  Irwin P. Levin,et al.  Framing effects in judgment tasks with varying amounts of information , 1985 .

[26]  H. Arkes,et al.  The Psychology of Sunk Cost , 1985 .

[27]  R. Abrams,et al.  Psychological sources of ambiguity avoidance , 1986 .

[28]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. , 1986 .

[29]  Robert L. Bangert-Drowns,et al.  Review of developments in meta-analytic method. , 1986 .

[30]  A. Tversky,et al.  Rational choice and the framing of decisions , 1990 .

[31]  The Framing of the Insurance Purchase Decision , 1986 .

[32]  Irwin P. Levin,et al.  Framing effects in decisions with completely and incompletely described alternatives , 1986 .

[33]  S E Fienberg,et al.  Risk preferences for gains and losses in multiple objective decision making , 1986 .

[34]  Philip Bobko,et al.  Contextual effects on escalation processes in public sector decision making , 1986 .

[35]  N. S. Fagley,et al.  The effects of decision framing on choice of risky vs certain options , 1987 .

[36]  Otto H. Chang,et al.  Taxpayer attitudes toward tax audit risk. , 1987 .

[37]  Paul H. Schurr,et al.  Effects of gain and loss decision frames on risky purchase negotiations. , 1987 .

[38]  J. Jaffray,et al.  Experimental comparison of individual behavior under risk and under uncertainty for gains and for losses , 1987 .

[39]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  David B. Montgomery,et al.  Learning from strategic success and failure , 1987 .

[41]  S D Nightingale,et al.  Risk Preference and Laboratory Use , 1987, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[42]  Gregory B. Northcraft,et al.  Decision bias and personnel selection strategies , 1987 .

[43]  Christopher P. Puto,et al.  The Framing of Buying Decisions , 1987 .

[44]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group and computer-mediated discussion effects in risk decision making. , 1987 .

[45]  J. March,et al.  Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking , 1987 .

[46]  H. Wilke,et al.  The effects of framing social dilemmas as give‐some or take‐some games , 1987 .

[47]  S. Komorita Cooperative Choice in Decomposed Social Dilemmas , 1987 .

[48]  Irwin P. Levin,et al.  Associative effects of information framing , 1987 .

[49]  Vandra L. Huber,et al.  The framing of negotiations: Contextual versus task frames , 1987 .

[50]  I. Levin,et al.  How information frame influences risky decisions: Between-subjects and within-subject comparisons , 1987 .

[51]  H. J. Einhorn,et al.  Expression theory and the preference reversal phenomena. , 1987 .

[52]  Christopher P. Puto,et al.  Do Consumers' Reference Points Affect Their Buying Decisions? , 1987 .

[53]  William Samuelson,et al.  Status quo bias in decision making , 1988 .

[54]  J. Fleishman,et al.  The Effects of Decision Framing and Others' Behavior on Cooperation in a Social Dilemma , 1988 .

[55]  S D Nightingale,et al.  Risk preference and decision making in critical care situations. , 1988, Chest.

[56]  J. Dutton,et al.  Discerning threats and opportunities. , 1988 .

[57]  A. Tversky,et al.  Contrasting Rational and Psychological Analyses of Political Choice , 1988, American Political Science Review.

[58]  Richard N. Osborn,et al.  Leaders, Riverboat Gamblers, or Purposeful Unintended Consequences in the Management of Complex, Dangerous Technologies , 1988 .

[59]  Blair T. Johnson DSTAT : software for the meta-analytic review of research literatures , 1992 .

[60]  T. Marteau,et al.  Framing of information: its influence upon decisions of doctors and patients. , 1989, The British journal of social psychology.

[61]  J. Rybash,et al.  The framing heuristic influences judgements about younger and older adults' decision to refuse medical treatment. , 1989, Applied cognitive psychology.

[62]  William J. Qualls,et al.  Organizational Climate and Decision Framing An Integrated Approach to Analyzing Industrial Buying Decisions , 1989 .

[63]  Dennis Duchon,et al.  Framing the problem and making decisions: the facts are not enough , 1989 .

[64]  T. S. Bateman,et al.  The psychological context of strategic decisions: A model and convergent experimental findings , 1989 .

[65]  B. Hailey,et al.  The Effects of Message Framing and Feelings of Susceptibility to Breast Cancer on Reported Frequency of Breast Self-Examination , 1989, International quarterly of community health education.

[66]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Windows of vulnerability or cognitive illusions? Cognitive processes and the nuclear arms race , 1989 .

[67]  Catherine S. Elliott,et al.  Subjective framing and attitudes towards risk , 1989 .

[68]  Irwin P. Levin,et al.  Risk taking, frame of reference, and characterization of victim groups in AIDS treatment decisions , 1990 .

[69]  Tatsuya Kameda,et al.  The function of the reference point in individual and group risk decision making , 1990 .

[70]  P. Miller,et al.  The Effect of Framing on Choice , 1990 .

[71]  J. Pligt,et al.  Problem representation, frame preference and risky choice , 1990 .

[72]  J. van der Pligt,et al.  Frames of reference, judgment and attitude , 1990 .

[73]  D. Lauver,et al.  Message framing, dispositional optimism, and follow-up for abnormal Papanicolaou tests. , 1990, Research in nursing & health.

[74]  O. Larichev,et al.  Contemporary issues in decision making , 1990 .

[75]  Joan Meyers-Levy,et al.  The Influence of Message Framing and Issue Involvement , 1990 .

[76]  Henk Elffers,et al.  Decision frame and opportunity as determinants of tax cheating: An international experimental study , 1990 .

[77]  Kenneth A. Wallston,et al.  Effects of Contract Framing, Motivation to Quit, and Self‐Efficacy on Smoking Reduction1 , 1990 .

[78]  William P. Bottom,et al.  Adaptive reference points in integrative bargaining. , 1990 .

[79]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Venture Theory: A Model of Decision Weights , 1990 .

[80]  Glenn E. Snelbecker,et al.  Effects of "Framing" on measures of risk tolerance: Financial planners are not immune , 1990 .

[81]  G. Gigerenzer,et al.  Probabilistic mental models: a Brunswikian theory of confidence. , 1991, Psychological review.

[82]  N. S. Fagley,et al.  The Effects of Framing, Problem Variations, and Providing Rationale on Choice , 1991 .

[83]  A. Elstein,et al.  Framing bias among expert and novice physicians. , 1991, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[84]  H. Jungermann,et al.  DETERMINANTEN, KORRELATE UND KONSEQUENZEN DER BEURTEILUNG VON RISIKEN FUR DIE EIGENE GESUNDHEIT , 1991 .

[85]  V. Reyna,et al.  Fuzzy-trace theory and framing effects in choice: Gist extraction, truncation, and conversion , 1991 .

[86]  Daniel J. Svyantek,et al.  The illusion of certainty: A catastrophe model of decision framing , 1991 .

[87]  William C. McDaniel,et al.  Management Dilemmas and Decisions , 1991 .

[88]  S. Schneider,et al.  Framing and conflict: aspiration level contingency, the status quo, and current theories of risky choice. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[89]  K. Aquino,et al.  The Effects of Resource Distribution, Voice, and Decision Framing on the Provision of Public Goods , 1992 .

[90]  H. Montgomery,et al.  Process and structure in human decision making , 1992 .

[91]  Ben Emans,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF OWN COGNITIVE AND OTHER'S COMMUNICATED GAIN OR LOSS FRAME ON NEGOTIATION BEHAVIOR , 1992 .

[92]  Amy L. Pablo,et al.  Reconceptualizing the Determinants of Risk Behavior , 1992 .

[93]  Wing Hong Loke,et al.  Effects of framing and missing information in expert and novice judgment , 1992 .

[94]  G. Gigerenzer,et al.  Domain-specific reasoning: Social contracts, cheating, and perspective change , 1992, Cognition.

[95]  Hans Lind,et al.  A note on the robustness of a classical framing result , 1992 .

[96]  A. Tversky,et al.  Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty , 1992 .

[97]  J. Zaat,et al.  General Practitioners’ Uncertainty, Risk Preference, and Use of Laboratory Tests , 1992, Medical care.

[98]  B. Rimer,et al.  The impact of mailing psychoeducational materials to women with abnormal mammograms. , 1992, American journal of public health.

[99]  Ben Emans,et al.  Frames of reference and cooperative social decision-making , 1992 .

[100]  F. Javier Lerch,et al.  Fading Frames: Data Presentation and Framing Effects* , 1992 .

[101]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  The Advantage Model: A Comparative Theory of Evaluation and Choice under Risk , 1993 .

[102]  Kazuhisa Takemura The effect of decision frame and decision justification on risky choice , 1993 .

[103]  William P. Bottom,et al.  Framing Effects and the Distributive Aspect of Integrative Bargaining , 1993 .

[104]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Framing, probability distortions, and insurance decisions , 1993 .

[105]  Philip M. J. Reckers,et al.  An examination of tax practitioner decisions: The role of preparer sanctions and framing effects associated with client condition , 1993 .

[106]  I. Erev,et al.  The effect of explicit probabilities on decision weights and on the reflection effect , 1993 .

[107]  Kenneth J. Dunegan Framing, cognitive modes, and image theory: Toward an understanding of a glass half full. , 1993 .

[108]  G. Baker,et al.  The impact of counselling with a practical statistical model on patients' decision-making about treatment for epilepsy: Findings from a pilot study , 1993, Epilepsy Research.

[109]  Ola Svenson,et al.  Framing and Time Pressure in Decision Making , 1993 .

[110]  Peter Salovey,et al.  The Influence of Message Framing on Intentions to Perform Health Behaviors , 1993 .

[111]  I. Levin,et al.  Risky decision making and allocation of resources for leukemia and AIDS programs. , 1993, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[112]  N. S. Fagley,et al.  A note concerning reflection effects versus framing effects , 1993 .

[113]  M. E. Tubbs,et al.  Framing Effects and Choice Shifts in Group Decision Making , 1993 .

[114]  Ola Svenson,et al.  Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making , 1993 .

[115]  R. Gregory,et al.  The Role of Past States in Determining Reference Points for Policy Decisions , 1993 .

[116]  D. Frisch Reasons for framing effects. , 1993 .

[117]  R. Scott Tindale,et al.  Framing and Group Decision-Making: Do Cognitive Changes Parallel Preference Changes? , 1993 .

[118]  J. Baron,et al.  Framing effects in the evaluation of multiple risk reduction , 1993 .

[119]  Hughes Kk,et al.  Decision making by patients with breast cancer: the role of information in treatment selection. , 1993 .

[120]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Decision risk in dynamic two-stage contexts: Beyond the status quo. , 1994 .

[121]  Vicki M. Bier,et al.  Ambiguity seeking in multi-attribute decisions: Effects of optimism and message framing , 1994 .

[122]  T. Kusumi,et al.  Belief, preference and willingness under ambiguity. , 1994 .

[123]  Mara Olekalns,et al.  Market forces, negotiator frames and transaction outcomes , 1994 .

[124]  Roger C. Mayer,et al.  Escalation of Commitment and the Framing Effect: An Empirical Investigation , 1994 .

[125]  David J. Klein,et al.  Effects of mood on high elaboration attitude change: The mediating role of likelihood judgments , 1994 .

[126]  Valerie F. Reyna,et al.  Fuzzy-Trace Theory and Framing Effects in Children's Risky Decision Making , 1994 .

[127]  Haim Mano,et al.  Risk-Taking, Framing Effects, and Affect , 1994 .

[128]  J. Gotlieb,et al.  The Moderating Effects of Message Framing and Source Credibility on the Price-perceived Risk Relationship , 1994 .

[129]  P. Carnevale,et al.  Effects of gain-loss frames in negotiation: Loss aversion, mismatching, and frame adoption , 1994 .

[130]  Kazuhisa Takemura,et al.  Influence of Elaboration on the Framing of Decision , 1994 .

[131]  V. J. Steffen,et al.  Practice and Persuasive Frame: Effects on Beliefs, Intention, and Performance of a Cancer Self‐Examination1 , 1994 .

[132]  E. Weber,et al.  Content and Discontent: Indications and Implications of Domain Specificity in Preferential Decision Making , 1995 .

[133]  Shu Li,et al.  Is There Something More Important behind Framing , 1995 .

[134]  J. Pligt,et al.  Influencing risk-preference in decision-making: The effects of framing and salience , 1995 .

[135]  Max H. Bazerman,et al.  Negotiating over Time: Impediments to Integrative Solutions , 1995 .

[136]  Terrence C. Sebora,et al.  Expected Utility Theory vs. Prospect Theory: Implications for Strategic Decision Makers , 1995 .

[137]  Yoav Ganzach,et al.  Message framing and buying behavior: A field experiment , 1995 .

[138]  Lauren G. Block,et al.  When to Accentuate the Negative: The Effects of Perceived Efficacy and Message Framing on Intentions to Perform a Health-Related Behavior , 1995 .

[139]  William A. Boettcher Context, Methods, Numbers, And Words , 1995 .

[140]  Peter J. Carnevale,et al.  Framing in Resource Dilemmas: Loss Aversion and the Moderating Effects of Sanctions , 1995 .

[141]  S. Sitkin,et al.  Determinants of Risky Decision-Making Behavior: A Test of the Mediating Role of Risk Perceptions and Propensity , 1995 .

[142]  Philippe Delquié,et al.  Stated vs Implicit Willingness to Pay Under Risk , 1995 .

[143]  Anton Kühberger,et al.  The Framing of Decisions: A New Look at Old Problems , 1995 .

[144]  Alexander J. Rothman,et al.  The effects of message framing on mammography utilization. , 1995, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[145]  Bernd H. Schmitt,et al.  Waiting time and decision making: is time like money? , 1995 .

[146]  A. Elstein,et al.  Pervasiveness of framing effects among physicians and medical students , 1995 .

[147]  L. Hedges,et al.  The Handbook of Research Synthesis , 1995 .

[148]  Paul W. Paese Effects of Framing on Actual Time Allocation Decisions , 1995 .

[149]  Victor S. Johnston,et al.  Perceived social context and risk preference: A re‐examination of framing effects in a life‐death decision problem , 1995 .

[150]  A. Schepanski,et al.  A Prospect Theory Account of the Income Tax Withholding Phenomenon , 1995 .

[151]  Jean-Paul Caverni,et al.  Contributions to decision making , 1995 .

[152]  Wang Framing Effects: Dynamics and Task Domains , 1996, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[153]  R. Petty,et al.  Message Framing and Persuasion: A Message Processing Analysis , 1996 .

[154]  Irwin P. Levin,et al.  Need for Cognition and Choice Framing Effects , 1996 .

[155]  J. Shanteau,et al.  An information processing view of framing effects: The role of causal schemas in decision making , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[156]  Scott Highhouse,et al.  Perspectives, Perceptions, and Risk-Taking Behavior , 1996 .

[157]  Scott Highhouse,et al.  Problem Domain and Prospect Frame: Choice under Opportunity versus Threat , 1996 .

[158]  Marjorie K. Shelley,et al.  Intertemporal Framing Issues in Management Compensation , 1996 .

[159]  Paul W. Paese,et al.  Contrast Effects on Strategic-Issue Framing , 1996 .

[160]  Jay Brand,et al.  File Drawer Problem , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[161]  O. Svenson,et al.  Decision making : cognitive models and explanations , 1997 .

[162]  C. Frith,et al.  Mapping the Mind , 1998 .

[163]  Philippe Mongin,et al.  Expected Utility Theory , 1998 .

[164]  Josef Perner,et al.  Predicting others through simulation or by theory? A method to decide , 1999 .