Strategic use of information technology for increased innovation and performance

Although we observe a general optimism concerning IT’s potential for creating suitable competitive advantages, there exists a lack of empirical support for the positive economic impact of IT on businesses. This is denoted as the productivity paradox of IT. We argue that in situations of hypercompetition, using conventional productivity measures as the only performance indicator would be inadequate when studying the impact IT has. Furthermore, investing in IT does not ensure its proper implementation. Consequently there is a need to consider what companies are using IT for and its consequences for innovation and a variety of performance measures. In a study of 200 firms within the Norwegian IT sector, we found that focusing on the use of IT might be a promising route for studying the relationship between IT and successful innovations, and between IT and performance. We also found a number of trade‐offs between the various performance measures and between successful innovations and performance. Although we were able to find positive effects of IT we argue in favour of developing an information and a knowledge strategy prior to developing an IT strategy

[1]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[2]  K. R. Conner,et al.  A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge Versus Opportunism , 1996 .

[3]  Raymond W. LaForge,et al.  A Marketing Strategy Analysis of Small Retailers , 1986 .

[4]  T. S. Raghunathan,et al.  A post-industrial paradigm: To integrate and automate manufacturing , 1997 .

[5]  M. Markus.  Electronic Mail as the Medium of Managerial Choice , 1994 .

[6]  Mohan Tanniru,et al.  Organizational learning and resource‐based theory: an integrative model , 1996 .

[7]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Fall and Rise of Strategic Planning , 1994 .

[8]  Rita Gunther McGrath,et al.  Innovation, competitive advantage and rent: a model and test , 1996 .

[9]  Madeline Weiss,et al.  Empowerment: Key to IS World-Class Quality , 1992, MIS Q..

[10]  A. Cooper.  Strategic management: New ventures and small business , 1981 .

[11]  S. Chatterjee,et al.  Regression Analysis by Example , 1979 .

[12]  V. Clark,et al.  Computer-aided multivariate analysis , 1991 .

[13]  Robert F. Hurley,et al.  Total Quality Research: Integrating Markets and the Organization , 1995 .

[14]  B. J. Berkley,et al.  Improving service quality with information technology , 1994 .

[15]  Louis Cohen,et al.  Statistics for Social Scientists , 1982 .

[16]  Diane Wilson.  Assessing the impact of information technology on organizational performance , 1993 .

[17]  T. Hennig-Thurau,et al.  The impact of customer satisfaction and relationship quality on customer retention: A critical reassessment and model development , 1997 .

[18]  L. Willcocks,et al.  In search of information technology productivity: Assessment issues , 1997 .

[19]  W. Nord,et al.  Implementing Routine and Radical Inno-vation , 1986 .

[20]  J. Howells.  Tacit Knowledge, Innovation and Technology Transfer. , 1996 .

[21]  R. Teas,et al.  Expectations, Performance Evaluation, and Consumers’ Perceptions of Quality , 1993 .

[22]  Richard A. Guzzo.  Organizational Linkages: Understanding the Productivity Paradox , 1996 .

[23]  Danny Miller,et al.  Strategy, Structure, CEO Personality and Performance in Small Firms , 1985 .

[24]  Stephen S. Cohen,et al.  Manufacturing Matters: The Myth of Post-Industrial Economy , 1988 .

[25]  T. Davenport.  Saving IT's Soul: Human-Centered Information Management. , 1994 .

[26]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  Managing innovation in the information age , 1994 .

[27]  Kenneth A. Kozar,et al.  A Multimedia Solution to Productivity Gridlock: A Re-Engineered Jewelry Appraisal System at Zale Corporation , 1994, MIS Q..

[28]  Jeff W. Trailer,et al.  Measuring performance in entrepreneurship research , 1996 .

[29]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Using Subjective Evaluations of Organizational Performance in Small Business Research , 1988 .

[30]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation , 1995 .

[31]  Pieter C. Arlow,et al.  Small businesses do plan and it pays off , 1985 .

[32]  Tawfik Jelassi,et al.  SIM Paper Competition: Competing Through EDI at Brun Passot: Achievements in France and Ambitions for the Single European Market , 1994, MIS Q..

[33]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[34]  M. Kotabe,et al.  The role of strategic alliances in high‐technology new product development , 1995 .

[35]  James T. C. Teng,et al.  Information technology-enabled change: the risks and rewards of business process redesign and automation , 1994, J. Inf. Technol..

[36]  Kim D Freeman,et al.  Measuring the Perceived Quality of Professional Business Services , 1993 .

[37]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[38]  James M. Utterback,et al.  A dynamic model of process and product innovation , 1975 .

[39]  T. C. Powell,et al.  Information technology as competitive advantage: the role of human , 1997 .

[40]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It To Performance , 1996 .

[41]  C. Morrison.  Assessing the Productivity of Information Technology Equipment in U.S. Manufacturing Industries , 1991, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[42]  J. B. Quinn,et al.  Managing Innovation: Controlled Chaos , 1985 .

[43]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Even Dwarfs Started Small: Liabilities of Age and Size and Their Strategic Implications , 1986 .

[44]  Jon-Arild Johannessen,et al.  Information management in negotiations: The conditions under which it could be expected that the negotiation partners substitute a competitive definition of the situation for a cooperative one , 1997 .

[45]  R. Rust,et al.  Why Improving Quality Doesn't Improve Quality (or Whatever Happened to Marketing?) , 1993 .

[46]  C. Steinfield,et al.  A Social Influence Model of Technology use , 1990 .

[47]  Jae-On Kim,et al.  Factor Analysis: Statistical Methods and Practical Issues , 1978 .

[48]  A. Barua,et al.  The Information Technology Productivity Paradox Revisited: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation in the Manufacturing Sector , 1997 .

[49]  Armand V. Feigenbaum,et al.  Total quality control , 1961 .

[50]  F. Reichheld.  Loyalty-based management. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[51]  J. Humble,et al.  Using service to gain a competitive edge—The PROMPT approach , 1993 .

[52]  James B. Wade.  A Community-Level Analysis of Sources and Rates of Technological Variation in the Microprocessor Market , 1996 .

[53]  Aysar Philip Sussan,et al.  The impact of market/quality orientation on business performance , 1997 .

[54]  M. Baily,et al.  The Productivity Slowdown, Measurement Issues, and the Explosion of Computer Power , 1989 .

[55]  A. Chakrabarti,et al.  Innovation Speed: A Conceptual Model of Context, Antecedents, and Outcomes , 1996 .

[56]  Ranjay Gulati,et al.  Is Slack Good or Bad for Innovation , 1996 .

[57]  George P. Huber,et al.  A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organizational design, intelligence , 1990 .

[58]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[59]  Chris W. Clegg,et al.  Information technology: a study of performance and the role of human and organizational factors , 1997 .

[60]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Stumblers and stars in the management of rapid growth , 1985 .

[61]  R. Duane Ireland,et al.  MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS AND MANAGERIAL COMMITMENT TO INNOVATION IN M-FORM FIRMS , 1990 .

[62]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Paradox Lost? Firm-Level Evidence on the Returns to Information Systems Spending , 1996 .

[63]  Ken Peffers,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology Investment Announcements on the Market Value of the Firm , 1993, Inf. Syst. Res..

[64]  V. K. Unni,et al.  The role of strategic planning in small business , 1981 .

[65]  Duncan Cramer,et al.  Quantitative data analysis for social scientists , 1990 .

[66]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit , 1984 .

[67]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[68]  Lynn W. Ellis,et al.  Measuring Customer Satisfaction , 1995 .

[69]  R. Sitgreaves.  Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). , 1979 .

[70]  F. Damanpour.  Organizational complexity and innovation: developing and testing multiple contingency models , 1996 .

[71]  Weill.  Do Computers Pay Off , 1990 .

[72]  G. Zaltman,et al.  Innovations and organizations , 2020, Organizational Innovation.

[73]  R. Grant,et al.  Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 2022 .

[74]  R. Lussier.  A Nonfinancial Business Success versus Failure Prediction Model for Young Firms , 1995 .

[75]  C. Brush,et al.  A comparison of methods and sources for obtaining estimates of new venture performance , 1992 .

[76]  Maria Charles,et al.  Cross-National Variation in Occupational Sex Segregation , 1992 .

[77]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[78]  A. Jurkus.  Requiem for a lightweight: The Northrop f‐20 strategic initiative , 1990 .

[79]  James Brian Quinn,et al.  The productivity paradox is false: Information technology improves services performance , 1996 .

[80]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[81]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  The productivity paradox of information technology , 1993, CACM.

[82]  P. Strassmann.  The Squandered Computer: Evaluating the Business Alignment of Information Technologies , 1997 .

[83]  Ian C. MacMillan,et al.  Characteristics distinguishing high-growth ventures , 1993 .

[84]  D. Storey.  Understanding the small business sector , 1994 .

[85]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .