Shape effect in active targeting of nanoparticles to inflamed cerebral endothelium under static and flow conditions.

Endothelial cells represent the first biological barrier for compounds, including nanoparticles, administered via the intravascular route. In the case of ischemic stroke and other vascular diseases, the endothelium overexpresses specific markers, which can be used as molecular targets to facilitate drug delivery and imaging. However, targeting these markers can be quite challenging due to the presence of blood flow and the associated hydrodynamic forces, reducing the likelihood of adhesion to the vessel wall. To overcome these challenges, various parameters including size, shape, charge or ligand coating have been explored to increase the targeting efficiency. Geometric shape can modulate nanoparticle binding to the cell, especially by counteracting part of the hydrodynamic forces of the bloodstream encountered by the classical spherical shape. In this study, the binding affinity of polystyrene nanoparticles with two different shapes, spherical and rod-shaped, were compared. First, vascular adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) was evaluated as a vascular target of inflammation, induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation. To evaluate the effect of nanoparticle shape on particle adhesion, nanoparticles were coated with anti-VCAM-1 and tested under static conditions in cell culture dishes coated with cerebral microvasculature cells (bEnd.3) and under dynamic flow conditions in microfluidic channels lined with hCMEC/D3 cells. Effect of particle shape on accumulation was also assessed in two in vivo models including systemic inflammation and local brain inflammation. The elongated rod-shaped particles demonstrated greater binding ability in vitro, reaching a 2.5-fold increase in the accumulation for static cultures and 1.5-fold for flow conditions. Anti-VCAM-1 coated rods exhibited a 3.5-fold increase in the brain accumulation compared to control rods. These results suggest shape offers a useful parameter in future design of drug delivery nanosystems or contrast agents for neurovascular pathologies.

[1]  B. Zhang,et al.  Biomimetic nanoparticles for inflammation targeting , 2017, Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B.

[2]  Shihu Wang,et al.  Nanoparticle design optimization for enhanced targeting: Monte Carlo simulations. , 2010, Biomacromolecules.

[3]  G. Kaplan,et al.  Thalidomide protects mice against LPS-induced shock. , 1997, Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas.

[4]  H. Soreq,et al.  Molecular Mechanisms Regulating LPS-Induced Inflammation in the Brain , 2016, Front. Mol. Neurosci..

[5]  Silvia Muro,et al.  Endothelial targeting of antibody-decorated polymeric filomicelles. , 2011, ACS nano.

[6]  Charles DiMarzio,et al.  Surface functionalization of gold nanoparticles using hetero-bifunctional poly(ethylene glycol) spacer for intracellular tracking and delivery , 2006, International journal of nanomedicine.

[7]  A. Saleh,et al.  Applications of nanoparticle systems in drug delivery technology , 2017, Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society.

[8]  K. Nicolay,et al.  Targeting of ICAM-1 on vascular endothelium under static and shear stress conditions using a liposomal Gd-based MRI contrast agent , 2012, Journal of Nanobiotechnology.

[9]  C. Marsh,et al.  Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Macrophage Inflammatory Response Is Regulated by SHIP1 , 2004, The Journal of Immunology.

[10]  Francesco Stellacci,et al.  Effect of surface properties on nanoparticle-cell interactions. , 2010, Small.

[11]  S. Nagata,et al.  Intraperitoneal Injection of Lipopolysaccharide Induces Dynamic Migration of Gr-1high Polymorphonuclear Neutrophils in the Murine Abdominal Cavity , 2004, Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology.

[12]  Jin Liu,et al.  Computational model for nanocarrier binding to endothelium validated using in vivo, in vitro, and atomic force microscopy experiments , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  D. Vivien,et al.  Ultra-Sensitive Molecular MRI of Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1 Reveals a Dynamic Inflammatory Penumbra After Strokes , 2013, Stroke.

[14]  Samir Mitragotri,et al.  Role of target geometry in phagocytosis. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  S. Bhatia,et al.  Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoworms for Tumor Targeting and Imaging , 2008, Advanced materials.

[16]  Jonathan Wang,et al.  Targeting cell adhesion molecules with nanoparticles using in vivo and flow-based in vitro models of atherosclerosis , 2017, Experimental biology and medicine.

[17]  Marco P Monopoli,et al.  Biomolecular coronas provide the biological identity of nanosized materials. , 2012, Nature nanotechnology.

[18]  Toshio Tanaka,et al.  IL-6 in inflammation, immunity, and disease. , 2014, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[19]  Samir Mitragotri,et al.  Macrophages Recognize Size and Shape of Their Targets , 2010, PloS one.

[20]  C. Montero-Menei,et al.  Lipopolysaccharide intracerebral administration induces minimal inflammatory reaction in rat brain , 1994, Brain Research.

[21]  D. Discher,et al.  Shape effects of filaments versus spherical particles in flow and drug delivery. , 2007, Nature nanotechnology.

[22]  Samir Mitragotri,et al.  Particle shape enhances specificity of antibody-displaying nanoparticles , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  G. Fernández,et al.  Pretreatment of mice with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or IL‐1β exerts dose‐dependent opposite effects on Shiga toxin‐2 lethality , 2000, Clinical and experimental immunology.

[24]  C. Smith,et al.  Endothelial adhesion molecules and their role in inflammation. , 1993, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[25]  S. Mitragotri,et al.  Making polymeric micro- and nanoparticles of complex shapes , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  W. D. de Jong,et al.  Drug delivery and nanoparticles: Applications and hazards , 2008, International journal of nanomedicine.

[27]  Hagar I Labouta,et al.  Nanoparticle localization in blood vessels: dependence on fluid shear stress, flow disturbances, and flow-induced changes in endothelial physiology. , 2018, Nanoscale.

[28]  Dong Chen,et al.  The shape effect of mesoporous silica nanoparticles on biodistribution, clearance, and biocompatibility in vivo. , 2011, ACS nano.

[29]  Samir Mitragotri,et al.  Using shape effects to target antibody-coated nanoparticles to lung and brain endothelium , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Y. Pang,et al.  Intracerebral lipopolysaccharide induces neuroinflammatory change and augmented brain injury in growth-restricted neonatal rats , 2012, Pediatric Research.

[31]  Li-Wen Wu,et al.  [Immortalized mouse brain endothelial cell line Bend.3 displays the comparative barrier characteristics as the primary brain microvascular endothelial cells]. , 2010, Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics.

[32]  Marissa Nichole Rylander,et al.  Flow shear stress regulates endothelial barrier function and expression of angiogenic factors in a 3D microfluidic tumor vascular model , 2014, Cell adhesion & migration.

[33]  Ou Chen,et al.  Fluorescent nanorods and nanospheres for real-time in vivo probing of nanoparticle shape-dependent tumor penetration. , 2011, Angewandte Chemie.

[34]  Stefan Tenzer,et al.  Rapid formation of plasma protein corona critically affects nanoparticle pathophysiology. , 2013, Nature nanotechnology.

[35]  M. Volpe,et al.  Endothelial Dysfunction and Stroke , 2001, Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology.

[36]  H. Daniel Ou-Yang,et al.  The influence of size, shape and vessel geometry on nanoparticle distribution , 2013, Microfluidics and nanofluidics.

[37]  Paula T Hammond,et al.  The effects of polymeric nanostructure shape on drug delivery. , 2011, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[38]  F. Nesslany,et al.  Study of serum interaction with a cationic nanoparticle: Implications for in vitro endocytosis, cytotoxicity and genotoxicity. , 2012, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[39]  J. Lahann,et al.  A microfluidic model of human brain (μHuB) for assessment of blood brain barrier , 2019, Bioengineering & translational medicine.

[40]  Samir Mitragotri,et al.  Particle shape: a new design parameter for micro- and nanoscale drug delivery carriers. , 2007, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[41]  Massimo Volpe,et al.  Alzheimer’s disease and endothelial dysfunction , 2010, Neurological Sciences.

[42]  S. Mitragotri,et al.  Microfluidic co‐culture devices to assess penetration of nanoparticles into cancer cell mass , 2017, Bioengineering & translational medicine.

[43]  V. Muzykantov,et al.  Reduction of nanoparticle avidity enhances the selectivity of vascular targeting and PET detection of pulmonary inflammation. , 2013, ACS nano.

[44]  T. Wyss-Coray,et al.  Inflammation in Alzheimer disease-a brief review of the basic science and clinical literature. , 2012, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine.

[45]  M Ferrari,et al.  The adhesive strength of non-spherical particles mediated by specific interactions. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[46]  S. Amor,et al.  Inflammation in neurodegenerative diseases – an update , 2014, Immunology.

[47]  P. Couraud,et al.  Large-Scale Quantitative Comparison of Plasma Transmembrane Proteins between Two Human Blood-Brain Barrier Model Cell Lines, hCMEC/D3 and HBMEC/ciβ. , 2019, Molecular pharmaceutics.

[48]  K. Fassbender,et al.  Molecular links between endothelial dysfunction and neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease. , 2014, Current Alzheimer research.

[49]  C. Villa,et al.  Combining vascular targeting and the local first pass provides 100‐fold higher uptake of ICAM‐1‐targeted vs untargeted nanocarriers in the inflamed brain , 2019, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[50]  A. Sabnis,et al.  Shear-regulated uptake of nanoparticles by endothelial cells and development of endothelial-targeting nanoparticles. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[51]  Tingrui Pan,et al.  Microfluidic System for Facilitated Quantification of Nanoparticle Accumulation to Cells Under Laminar Flow , 2012, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[52]  N. Abbott,et al.  The endo-lysosomal system of bEnd.3 and hCMEC/D3 brain endothelial cells , 2019, Fluids and Barriers of the CNS.

[53]  C. Matute,et al.  The link of inflammation and neurodegeneration in progressive multiple sclerosis , 2016, Multiple Sclerosis and Demyelinating Disorders.

[54]  W. Hennink,et al.  PLGA‐PEG nanoparticles for targeted delivery of the mTOR/PI3kinase inhibitor dactolisib to inflamed endothelium , 2017, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[55]  Samir Mitragotri,et al.  Control of endothelial targeting and intracellular delivery of therapeutic enzymes by modulating the size and shape of ICAM-1-targeted carriers. , 2008, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[56]  T. Nishioku,et al.  Paracellular barrier and tight junction protein expression in the immortalized brain endothelial cell lines bEND.3, bEND.5 and mouse brain endothelial cell 4. , 2013, Biological & pharmaceutical bulletin.

[57]  James G. White,et al.  Blood-nanoparticle interactions and in vivo biodistribution: impact of surface PEG and ligand properties. , 2012, Molecular pharmaceutics.

[58]  S. Muro,et al.  ICAM‐1‐targeted nanocarriers attenuate endothelial release of soluble ICAM‐1, an inflammatory regulator , 2017, Bioengineering & translational medicine.

[59]  Edouard C. Nice,et al.  Differential roles of the protein corona in the cellular uptake of nanoporous polymer particles by monocyte and macrophage cell lines. , 2013, ACS nano.

[60]  Kinam Park,et al.  Effects of the Microparticle Shape on Cellular Uptake. , 2016, Molecular pharmaceutics.

[61]  Xiangxiang Liu,et al.  Size Dependent Cellular Uptake of Rod-like Bionanoparticles with Different Aspect Ratios , 2016, Scientific Reports.