The Use of Image Blur as a Depth Cue

Images of three-dimensional scenes inevitably contain regions that are spatially blurred by differing amounts, owing to depth-of-focus limitations in the imaging apparatus. Recent perceptual data indicate that this blur variation acts as an effective cue to depth: if one image region contains sharply focused texture, and another contains blurred texture, then the two regions may be perceived at different depths, even in the absence of other depth cues. Calculations based on the optical properties of the human eye have shown that variation in blur as a function of depth follows the same course as variation in binocular disparity with depth. Computational modelling has shown that the effect of blur on single-step edges is very similar to its effect on random fractal patterns, because the two stimuli have similar Fourier amplitude spectra. Blur discrimination thresholds for the two stimuli were also very similar, and could be predicted by a model based on high-spatial-frequency discrimination. A comparison of blur discrimination thresholds with the range of binocular stereopsis indicates that blur and disparity cues cover different distance ranges: stereopsis is most effective for distances relatively close to fixation, while blur information should be more effective for larger distances.

[1]  J. Berkson A Statistically Precise and Relatively Simple Method of Estimating the Bio-Assay with Quantal Response, Based on the Logistic Function , 1953 .

[2]  Campbell Fw A method for measuring the depth of field of the human eye. , 1954 .

[3]  F. Campbell,et al.  A method for measuring the depth of field of the human eye. , 1957, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  G. Westheimer,et al.  Fluctuations of accommodation under steady viewing conditions , 1959, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  F. Campbell,et al.  Optical quality of the human eye , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  R. Gubisch,et al.  Optical Performance of the Human Eye , 1967 .

[7]  R M Burde,et al.  THE PUPIL , 1967, International ophthalmology clinics.

[8]  F. Campbell,et al.  Spatial-frequency discrimination in human vision. , 1970, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[9]  C. Blakemore,et al.  The perceived spatial frequency shift: evidence for frequency‐selective neurones in the human brain , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  S. Klein,et al.  The simultaneous spatial frequency shift: a dissociation between the detection and perception of gratings. , 1974, Vision research.

[11]  J Nachmias,et al.  Letter: Grating contrast: discrimination may be better than detection. , 1974, Vision research.

[12]  S. McKee,et al.  Spatial configurations for visual hyperacuity , 1977, Vision Research.

[13]  R. Marc,et al.  Chromatic organization of primate cones. , 1977, Science.

[14]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Contrast masking in human vision. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[15]  C. Schor,et al.  Disparity range for local stereopsis as a function of luminance spatial frequency , 1983, Vision Research.

[16]  R. Watt,et al.  The recognition and representation of edge blur: Evidence for spatial primitives in human vision , 1983, Vision Research.

[17]  M. Georgeson,et al.  Spatial selectivity of contrast adaptation: Models and data , 1984, Vision Research.

[18]  J. C. Kotulak,et al.  Temporal variations in accommodation during steady-state conditions. , 1986, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[19]  Alex Pentland,et al.  A New Sense for Depth of Field , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[20]  D J Field,et al.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[21]  Heinz-Otto Peitgen,et al.  The science of fractal images , 2011 .

[22]  James M. Brown,et al.  A spatial frequency effect on perceived depth , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  Muralidhara Subbarao,et al.  Depth recovery from blurred edges , 1988, Proceedings CVPR '88: The Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[24]  W N Charman,et al.  Perceptual detectability of ocular accommodation microfluctuations. , 1989, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[25]  D. Field,et al.  Human discrimination of fractal images. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[26]  Peter Lawrence,et al.  An Investigation of Methods for Determining Depth from Focus , 1993, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[27]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Discrimination of changes in the second-order statistics of natural and synthetic images , 1994, Vision Research.

[28]  M A Georgeson,et al.  From filters to features: location, orientation, contrast and blur. , 1994, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[29]  M. Morgan,et al.  Effects of motion on blur discrimination , 1994 .

[30]  Ian P. Howard,et al.  Binocular Vision and Stereopsis , 1996 .

[31]  George Mather,et al.  Image blur as a pictorial depth cue , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  C. A. Burbeck,et al.  Occlusion edge blur: a cue to relative visual depth. , 1996, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[33]  H S Smallman,et al.  Fine grain of the neural representation of human spatial vision , 1996, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[34]  J. H. van Hateren,et al.  Modelling the Power Spectra of Natural Images: Statistics and Information , 1996, Vision Research.

[35]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Discrimination of Changes in the Slopes of the Amplitude Spectra of Natural Images: Band-Limited Contrast and Psychometric Functions , 1997, Perception.

[36]  RussLL L. Ds Vnlos,et al.  SPATIAL FREQUENCY SELECTIVITY OF CELLS IN MACAQUE VISUAL CORTEX , 2022 .