Linear Array Thinning Exploiting Almost Difference Sets

This paper describes a class of linear thinned arrays with predictable and well-behaved sidelobes. The element placement is based on almost difference sets and the array power pattern is forced to pass through N uniformly-spaced values that, although neither equal nor constant as for difference sets, are a-priori known from the knowledge of the aperture size, the number of active array elements K, and the features of the correlation function. Such a property allows one to predict the bounds of the confidence range of the peak sidelobe of the admissible arrays obtainable through simple shift operations on a binary sequence. The expected peak sidelobe performances turn out to be comparable with those from difference sets, even though obtainable in a wider set of array configurations, and improved in comparison with cut-and-try random-placements.

[1]  S. Holm,et al.  Properties of the beampattern of weight- and layout-optimized sparse arrays , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[2]  D. Leeper,et al.  Isophoric arrays-massively thinned phased arrays with well-controlled sidelobes , 1999 .

[3]  K.C. Kerby,et al.  Sidelobe level and wideband behavior of arrays of random subarrays , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[4]  Eric Michielssen,et al.  Integer coded Pareto genetic algorithm design of constrained antenna arrays , 1996 .

[5]  B. Steinberg,et al.  Comparison between the peak sidelobe of the random array and algorithmically designed aperiodic arrays , 1973 .

[6]  A. Massa,et al.  Peak sidelobe level reduction with a hybrid approach based on GAs and difference sets , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[7]  Randy L. Haupt Genetic algorithm design of antenna arrays , 1996, 1996 IEEE Aerospace Applications Conference. Proceedings.

[8]  A. Trucco,et al.  Thinning and weighting of large planar arrays by simulated annealing , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[9]  P. K. Chaturvedi,et al.  Communication Systems , 2002, IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing.

[10]  K. C. Kerby,et al.  Sidelobe level and wideband behavior of arrays of random subarrays , 2006 .

[11]  Cunsheng Ding,et al.  Almost difference sets and their sequences with optimal autocorrelation , 2001, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[12]  Mark Goresky,et al.  Fourier transforms and the 2-adic span of periodic binary sequences , 2000, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[13]  J. M. Johnson,et al.  Genetic algorithms in electromagnetics , 1996, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium. 1996 Digest.

[14]  V. Murino,et al.  Stochastic optimization of linear sparse arrays , 1999 .

[15]  B. Steinberg The peak sidelobe of the phased array having randomly located elements , 1972 .

[16]  Richard E. Blahut Transform Techniques for Error Control Codes , 1979, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[17]  Randy L. Haupt,et al.  Thinned arrays using genetic algorithms , 1993, Proceedings of IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium.

[18]  Cunsheng Ding,et al.  Several classes of binary sequences with three-level autocorrelation , 1999, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[19]  Yuan Zhang,et al.  A new family of almost difference sets and some necessary conditions , 2006, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[20]  L. E. Kopilovich,et al.  Square Array Antennas Based on Hadamard Difference Sets , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.