"I wish I had seen this test result earlier!": Dissatisfaction with test result management systems in primary care.

BACKGROUND Failure to review and follow up on outpatient test results in a timely manner represents a patient safety and malpractice concern. Therefore, we sought to identify problems in current test result management systems and possible ways to improve these systems. METHODS We surveyed 262 physicians working in 15 internal medicine practices affiliated with 2 large urban teaching hospitals (response rate, 64%). We asked physicians about systems they used and the amount of time they spent managing test results. We asked them to report delays in reviewing test results and their overall satisfaction with their management of test results. We also asked physicians to rate features they would find useful in a new test result management system. RESULTS Overall, 83% of respondents reported at least 1 delay in reviewing test results during the previous 2 months. Despite reporting that they spent on average 74 minutes per clinical day managing test results, only 41% of physicians reported being satisfied with how they managed test results. Satisfaction was associated with fewer self-reported delays in reviewing test results. Physicians who actively tracked their test orders to completion were also more likely to be satisfied. The most highly desired features of a test result management system were tools to help physicians generate result letters to patients, prioritize their workflow, and track test orders to completion. CONCLUSIONS Delays in test result review are common, and many physicians are not satisfied with how they manage test results. Tools to improve test result management in office practices need to improve workflow efficiency and track test orders to completion.

[1]  D. Singer,et al.  Determinants of compliance with anticoagulation: A case-control study. , 1997, The American journal of medicine.

[2]  R. Lowes Patient-centered care for better patient adherence. , 1998, Family practice management.

[3]  DiMatteo Mr Enhancing patient adherence to medical recommendations. , 1994 .

[4]  David W Bates,et al.  Comparison of methods for detecting medication errors in 36 hospitals and skilled-nursing facilities. , 2002, American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.

[5]  J. Berek,et al.  Improving Adherence to Screening Follow-Up Among Women with Abnormal Pap Smears: Results from a Large Clinic-Based Trial of Three Intervention Strategies , 1992, Medical care.

[6]  James T. Reason,et al.  Managing the risks of organizational accidents , 1997 .

[7]  J. Meza,et al.  Patient preferences for laboratory test results notification. , 2000, The American journal of managed care.

[8]  J. Berek,et al.  Reducing loss-to-follow-up among women with abnormal Pap smears. Results from a randomized trial testing an intensive follow-up protocol and economic incentives. , 1998, Medical care.

[9]  B. McCarthy,et al.  Patient notification and follow-up of abnormal test results. A physician survey. , 1996, Archives of internal medicine.

[10]  M. Dimatteo Enhancing patient adherence to medical recommendations. , 1994, JAMA.

[11]  S. Edlavitch,et al.  Adverse drug event reporting. Improving the low US reporting rates. , 1988, Archives of internal medicine.

[12]  Alastair Baker,et al.  Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  Meza Jp,et al.  Patient preferences for laboratory test results notification. , 2000 .

[14]  David W. Bates,et al.  Primary care physician attitudes concerning follow-up of abnormal test results and ambulatory decision support systems , 2003, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[15]  J. Rolph,et al.  Omission-Related Malpractice Claims and the Limits of Defensive Medicine , 1997, Medical care research and review : MCRR.

[16]  D M Berwick,et al.  A primer on leading the improvement of systems , 1996, BMJ.

[17]  David W. Bates,et al.  Design and implementation of a comprehensive outpatient Results Manager , 2003, J. Biomed. Informatics.