Using Group Decision Support System to Support Value Management Workshops

A group decision support system (GDSS) is an interactive computer-based information system that combines the capabilities of communication technologies, database technologies, computer technologies, and decision technologies to support the identification, analysis, formulation, evaluation, and solution of semistructured or unstructured problems by a group in a user-friendly computing environment. As there is a strong demand for improvements to the practice of value management (VM), research has been conducted to design a GDSS prototype system, named the interactive value management system (IVMS), to explore its potential application in VM workshops and to investigate the effect of the application. The paper begins with an introduction to the problems of implementing VM in the Hong Kong construction industry and then proceeds to an illustration of the features of the proposed system, which has been developed in the research. Two validation studies designed to test the support of the proposed system are described and the results discussed. Findings from this research indicate that IVMS is supportive in overcoming the problems and difficulties in VM workshops.

[1]  Ekambaram Palaneeswaran,et al.  Web-Based Client Advisory Decision Support System for Design.Builder Prequalification , 2005 .

[2]  J. Valacich,et al.  Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups , 1990 .

[3]  Jacky K.H. Chung,et al.  A Group Support System for improving value management studies in construction , 2004 .

[4]  P. Paulus,et al.  The Role of Social Anxiousness in Group Brainstorming , 1995 .

[5]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .

[6]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Computer Support for Group Versus Individual Decisions , 1982, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[7]  M. Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. , 1987 .

[8]  Helmut Lamm,et al.  Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency , 1973 .

[9]  J. Davitz,et al.  A survey of studies contrasting the quality of group performance and individual performance, 1920-1957. , 1958, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  M. C. Er,et al.  The anonymity and proximity factors in group decision support systems , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[11]  Jacky K.H. Chung,et al.  A group decision support system for value management studies in the construction industry , 2002 .

[12]  William Remus,et al.  Graduate students as surrogates for managers in experiments on business decision making , 1986 .

[13]  Sadi Assaf,et al.  COMPUTERIZED SYSTEM FOR APPLICATION OF VALUE ENGINEERING METHODOLOGY , 2000 .

[14]  T. Connolly,et al.  Toward Atheory of Automated Group Work , 1990 .

[15]  Moonseo Park,et al.  Web-Enabled System Dynamics Model for Error and Change Management on Concurrent Design and Construction Projects , 2006 .

[16]  Scott Fernie,et al.  The Value Management Benchmark: a Good Practice Framework for Clients and Practitioners , 1998 .

[17]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group processes in computer-mediated communication☆ , 1986 .

[18]  John Kelly,et al.  Value Management of Construction Projects: Kelly/Value , 2008 .

[19]  Hao Xie,et al.  Developing a Web-Based System for Large-Scale Environmental Hydraulics Problems with Application to Oil Spill Modeling , 2006 .

[20]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  ELECTRONIC BRAINSTORMING AND GROUP SIZE , 1992 .

[21]  Alan Robert Dennis,et al.  Parallelism, anonymity, structure, and group size in electronic meetings , 1991 .

[22]  E. Salas,et al.  Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. , 1991 .

[23]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  Graduate business students as surrogates for executives in the evaluation of technology , 1996 .

[24]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  An Assessment of Group Support Systems Experimental Research: Methodology and Results , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  The evolution of user behavior in a computerized conferencing system , 1981, CACM.