Exploration of Vehicle Impact Speed – Injury Severity Relationships for Application in Safer Road Design

The Safe System vision (known as Vision Zero, or Sustainable Safety in Europe) aspires to minimise death and serious injury as an outcome of road travel for all road users. The road engineering contribution to this vision focusses on impact elimination, or where this is not possible, on limiting kinetic energy passed to a road user in case of an impact. Impact kinetic energy is typically limited through vehicle speed management (e.g. speed limits, enforcement or geometric road design), as vehicle mass is difficult to effectively control by public road agencies. This paper reviews available international research on relationships between impact velocity change (delta-v), impact speeds and the probability of fatal and serious injury using the Maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale 3+ (MAIS3+) across a range of common crash scenarios. Based on the best identified relationships, and with assumption of equal mass and vehicle speeds, right-angle and head-on impact speeds of approximately 30 km/h are likely to produce MASI3+ injury probability of approximately 10%, considered a critical threshold in Safe System discussions. For pedestrians, the threshold is likely to be even lower, approximately 20 km/h. In rear-end crashes, the critical impact speed was found to be approximately 55 km/h. Some practical applications of these findings are discussed. The paper discusses the assumptions and limitations behind the available evidence, and outlines the proposed research to strengthen it.

[1]  H C Joksch,et al.  Velocity change and fatality risk in a crash--a rule of thumb. , 1993, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  Göran Nilsson,et al.  Traffic Safety Dimensions and the Power Model to Describe the Effect of Speed on Safety , 2004 .

[3]  Gary A. Davis,et al.  Relating Severity of Pedestrian Injury to Impact Speed in Vehicle-Pedestrian Crashes: Simple Threshold Model , 2001 .

[4]  Helena Titheridge,et al.  Vehicle mass and injury risk in two-car crashes: A novel methodology. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Donald E. Struble,et al.  Automotive Accident Reconstruction: Practices and Principles , 2013 .

[6]  Chris Jurewicz,et al.  Improving the performance of safe system infrastructure: final report , 2015 .

[7]  George Bahouth,et al.  The Benefits and Tradeoffs for Varied High-Severity Injury Risk Thresholds for Advanced Automatic Crash Notification Systems , 2014, Traffic injury prevention.

[8]  Helena Stigson,et al.  Literature review of pedestrian fatality risk as a function of car impact speed. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  Brian C Tefft,et al.  Impact speed and a pedestrian's risk of severe injury or death. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  L. Evans,et al.  Driver injury and fatality risk in two-car crashes versus mass ratio inferred using Newtonian mechanics. , 1994, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  Chris Jurewicz,et al.  Improving the performance of safe system infrastructure: stage 1 interim report , 2013 .

[12]  George Bahouth,et al.  Influence of injury risk thresholds on the performance of an algorithm to predict crashes with serious injuries. , 2012, Annals of advances in automotive medicine. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Annual Scientific Conference.

[13]  Rune Elvik,et al.  A re-parameterisation of the Power Model of the relationship between the speed of traffic and the number of accidents and accident victims. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Craig N. Kloeden,et al.  REANALYSIS OF TRAVELLING SPEED AND THE RISK OF CRASH INVOLVEMENT IN ADELAIDE, SOUTH AUSTRALIA , 2002 .