Consumption- Versus Production-Based Emission Policies

Emission leakage could potentially undermine the effectiveness of unilateral climate policies. Significant emission transfers from developing countries to developed countries in the form of emissions embodied in trade have been interpreted as an indication of such leakage. To reduce leakage and provide an appropriate picture of countries’ responsibility for global emissions, an alternative proposal is to attribute emissions on the basis of consumption instead of production. However, as one unit of imported emissions generally cannot be equated with a corresponding increase in emissions released to the atmosphere, putting a price on emissions embodied in imports equal to the social cost of these emissions (e.g., by means of consumption-based emission pricing) is not an optimal policy. Hence, one should consider a broad scope of trade measures to reduce leakage, focusing on a few highly traded, emission-intensive industries. Finally, the optimal policy portfolio to address leakage may also contain free allocation of emission permits and sectoral approaches.

[1]  F. Jotzo Australia’s carbon price , 2012 .

[2]  Edward J. Balistreri,et al.  Subglobal carbon policy and the competitive selection of heterogeneous firms , 2012 .

[3]  P. Krugman Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and international trade , 1979 .

[4]  M. Babiker Climate change policy, market structure, and carbon leakage , 2005 .

[5]  C. Hepburn,et al.  Trade, climate change, and the political game theory of border carbon adjustments , 2012 .

[6]  Jean Chateau,et al.  Is there a case for carbon-based border tax adjustment? An applied general equilibrium analysis , 2013 .

[7]  Trevor Houser,et al.  Leveling the Carbon Playing Field: International Competition and US Climate Policy Design , 2008 .

[8]  Jérôme Hilaire,et al.  Carbon leakage in a fragmented climate regime: The dynamic response of global energy markets , 2015 .

[9]  Edward E. Leamer,et al.  The Leontief Paradox, Reconsidered , 1980, Journal of Political Economy.

[10]  R. Marschinski,et al.  Should carbon-exporting countries strive for consumption-based accounting in a global cap-and-trade regime? , 2010 .

[11]  Thomas F. Rutherford,et al.  The Economic Effects of Border Measures in Subglobal Climate Agreements , 2005 .

[12]  A. Denny Ellerman,et al.  Pricing Carbon: List of appendices , 2010 .

[13]  M. Wara,et al.  Is the global carbon market working? , 2007, Nature.

[14]  A. C. Pigou Economics of welfare , 1920 .

[15]  C. Weber,et al.  Growth in emission transfers via international trade from 1990 to 2008 , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  P. Quirion,et al.  Climate policy and the ‘carbon haven’ effect , 2014 .

[17]  Thomas O. Michielsen,et al.  The Distribution of Energy-Intensive Sectors in the US , 2011 .

[18]  Karl W. Steininger,et al.  The relevance of process emissions for carbon leakage: A comparison of unilateral climate policy options with and without border carbon adjustment , 2012 .

[19]  Stefan Boeters,et al.  Fossil Fuel Supply, Leakage and the Effectiveness of Border Measures in Climate Policy , 2012 .

[20]  J. Bhagwati,et al.  Is action against US exports for failure to sign Kyoto Protocol WTO-legal? , 2007, World Trade Review.

[21]  Misato Sato,et al.  Embodied Carbon in Trade: A Survey of the Empirical Literature , 2014 .

[22]  S. Davis,et al.  Accounting for carbon dioxide emissions: A matter of time , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Zhongxiang Zhang Competitiveness and Leakage Concerns and Border Carbon Adjustments , 2012 .

[24]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Consumption-based GHG emission accounting: a UK case study , 2013 .

[25]  T. Rutherford,et al.  Efficiency and Equity Implications of Alternative Instruments to Reduce Carbon Leakage , 2012 .

[26]  M. Hoel Efficient Climate Policy in the Presence of Free Riders , 1994 .

[27]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  When do increasing carbon taxes accelerate global warming? A note on the green paradox , 2011 .

[28]  Alan K. Fox,et al.  Climate Policy and Fiscal Constraints: Do Tax Interactions Outweigh Carbon Leakage? , 2012 .

[29]  J. Werksman,et al.  Leveling The Carbon Playing Field , 2008 .

[30]  Erik Dietzenbacher,et al.  An Empirical Examination of the Pollution Haven Hypothesis for India: Towards a Green Leontief Paradox? , 2007 .

[31]  T. Rutherford,et al.  Unilateral CO2 Reductions and Carbon Leakage: The Consequences of International Trade in Oil and Basic Materials , 1993 .

[32]  H. Siebert Environmental policy in the two-country-case , 1979 .

[33]  A. Denny Ellerman,et al.  Pricing Carbon: Index , 2010 .

[34]  H. Sinn Public policies against global warming: a supply side approach , 2008 .

[35]  Scott Barrett,et al.  The strategy of trade sanctions in international environmental agreements , 1997 .

[36]  Steven J Davis,et al.  The supply chain of CO2 emissions , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Errors in Conventional and Input‐Output—based Life—Cycle Inventories , 2000 .

[38]  Todd Munson,et al.  Trade and Carbon Taxes , 2010 .

[39]  Philippe Quirion,et al.  CO2 abatement, competitiveness and leakage in the European cement industry under the EU ETS: grandfathering versus output-based allocation , 2006 .

[40]  P. Samuelson The Pure Theory of Public Expanditure , 1954 .

[41]  Philippe Quirion,et al.  Addressing leakage in the EU ETS: Border adjustment or output-based allocation? , 2011 .

[42]  D. P. Vuuren,et al.  Environmental effectiveness and economic consequences of fragmented versus universal regimes: what can we learn from model studies? , 2009 .

[43]  Arik Levinson,et al.  Offshoring Pollution: Is the United States Increasingly Importing Polluting Goods? , 2010, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[44]  Alan K. Fox,et al.  The Role of Trade and Competitiveness Measures in US Climate Policy , 2011 .

[45]  E. Hertwich,et al.  CO2 embodied in international trade with implications for global climate policy. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[46]  Jean Charles Hourcade,et al.  Differentiation and dynamics of EU ETS industrial competitiveness impacts: Final Report , 2014 .

[47]  Michael Hoel,et al.  Should a carbon tax be differentiated across sectors , 1993 .

[48]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  Will Border Carbon Adjustments Work? , 2011 .

[49]  The suboptimal nature of applying Pigouvian rates as border adjustments , 2012 .

[50]  J. Markusen INTERNATIONAL EXTERNALITIES AND OPTIMAL TAX STRUCTURES , 1975, World Scientific Studies in International Economics.

[51]  Michael Hoel,et al.  Unilateral Emission Reductions and Cross-Country Technology Spillovers , 2004 .

[52]  G. Peters,et al.  A synthesis of carbon in international trade , 2012 .

[53]  S. Davis,et al.  Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[54]  M. Hoel,et al.  Efficient incomplete international climate agreements , 1995 .

[55]  Philippe Quirion,et al.  European Emission Trading Scheme and competitiveness: A case study on the iron and steel industry , 2008 .

[56]  J. Burton,et al.  Birds and climate change , 1995 .

[57]  Marjan W. Hofkes,et al.  Border adjustment for European emissions trading: Competitiveness and carbon leakage , 2010 .

[58]  J. Hovi,et al.  The price of non-compliance with the Kyoto Protocol: The remarkable case of Norway , 2007 .

[59]  B. Copeland Pollution content tariffs, environmental rent shifting, and the control of cross-border pollution , 1996 .

[60]  Reyer Gerlagh,et al.  Energy Abundance, Trade and Industry Location , 2011 .

[61]  Scott Barrett,et al.  Rethinking Climate Change Governance and its Relationship to the World Trading System , 2011 .

[62]  Kate Scott,et al.  Link between climate change mitigation and resource efficiency: A UK case study , 2012 .

[63]  JOHN W. Evans The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade , 1968, International Organization.

[64]  Joost Pauwelyn U.S. Federal Climate Policy and Competitiveness Concerns: The Limits and Options of International Trade Law , 2007 .

[65]  P. Quirion Historic versus output-based allocation of GHG tradable allowances: a comparison , 2009 .

[66]  Steffen Kallbekken,et al.  Why the CDM will reduce carbon leakage , 2007 .

[67]  K. E. Rosendahl,et al.  Carbon Leakage from the Clean Development Mechanism , 2011 .

[68]  Bin Shui,et al.  The role of CO2 embodiment in US-China trade , 2006 .

[69]  Lambert Schneider,et al.  Assessing the additionality of CDM projects: practical experiences and lessons learned , 2009 .

[70]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  The effects of tariffs on coalition formation in a dynamic global warming game , 2009 .

[71]  Alan K. Fox,et al.  Comparing Policies to Combat Emissions Leakage: Border Carbon Adjustments versus Rebates , 2011 .

[72]  Valentina Bosetti,et al.  International Energy R&D Spillovers and the Economics of Greenhouse Gas Atmospheric Stabilization , 2007 .

[73]  P. Krugman,et al.  A ‘reciprocal dumping’ model of international trade , 1983 .

[74]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  Trade, transport, and sinks extend the carbon dioxide responsibility of countries: An editorial essay , 2009 .

[75]  Serge Coulombe Intranational Trade Diversion, the Canada-United States Free Trade Agreement, and the L Curve , 2004 .

[76]  Taran Fæhn,et al.  Alternative Designs for Tariffs on Embodied Carbon: A Global Cost-Effectiveness Analysis , 2012 .

[77]  M. Keen,et al.  Coordinating Climate and Trade Policies: Pareto Efficiency and the Role of Border Tax Adjustments , 2011, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[78]  Michael Jakob,et al.  Sectoral linking of carbon markets: A trade-theory analysis , 2012 .

[79]  Jianwu He,et al.  Reconciling Climate Change and Trade Policy , 2009 .

[80]  C. Weber,et al.  China's growing CO2 emissions--a race between increasing consumption and efficiency gains. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[81]  Gabriel Felbermayr,et al.  Kyoto and the carbon footprint of nations , 2012 .

[82]  Michael Hübler,et al.  Between a Rock and a Hard Place: A Trade-Theory Analysis of Leakage Under Production- and Consumption-Based Policies , 2013 .

[83]  C. Fischer,et al.  The Global Effects of Subglobal Climate Policies , 2010 .

[84]  D. Stern,et al.  Decomposing the 2010 global carbon dioxide emissions rebound , 2012 .

[85]  Michael Hübler,et al.  Fair, optimal or detrimental? Environmental vs. strategic use of border carbon adjustment , 2012 .

[86]  Jiahua Pan,et al.  China's balance of emissions embodied in trade: approaches to measurement and allocating international responsibility , 2008 .

[87]  Arja H. Turunen-Red,et al.  Multilateral Reforms of Trade and Environmental Policy , 2004 .

[88]  S. Barrett Self-enforcing international environmental agreements , 1994 .

[89]  Harro van Asselt,et al.  Addressing competitiveness and leakage concerns in climate policy: An analysis of border adjustment measures in the US and the EU , 2010 .

[90]  Andrew Skelton,et al.  EU corporate action as a driver for global emissions abatement: A structural analysis of EU international supply chain carbon dioxide emissions , 2013 .

[91]  M. Weitzman The 'Ratchet Principle' and Performance Incentives , 1980 .

[92]  Sebastian Rausch,et al.  A Numerical Investigation of the Potential for Negative Emissions Leakage , 2013 .

[93]  Jared C. Carbone Linking Numerical and Analytical Models of Carbon Leakage , 2013 .

[94]  G. Luderer,et al.  Global fossil energy markets and climate change mitigation – an analysis with REMIND , 2012, Climatic Change.

[95]  S. Merrett The Leontief Paradox , 1965 .

[96]  Glen P. Peters,et al.  The contribution of Chinese exports to climate change , 2008 .

[97]  Don Fullerton,et al.  Leakage, Welfare, and Cost-Effectiveness of Carbon Policy , 2013 .

[98]  Antoine Dechezleprêtre,et al.  Asymmetric industrial energy prices and international trade , 2015 .

[99]  C. Carraro,et al.  Strategies for the international protection of the environment , 1993 .

[100]  Daniel Trefler,et al.  The Case of the Missing Trade and Other Mysteries , 2002 .

[101]  J. D. Cendra Can Emission Trading Schemes be Coupled with Border Tax Adjustments? An Analysis vis-à-vis WTO Law , 2006 .

[102]  M. S. Taylor,et al.  Unbundling the Pollution Haven Hypothesis , 2005 .

[103]  K. Neuhoff,et al.  Cambridge Working Papers in Economics CWPE 0409 Border Tax Adjustments: A Feasible way to Support Stringent Emission Trading , 2007 .

[104]  C. D. Maria,et al.  Carbon leakage revisited: unilateral climate policy with directed technical change , 2008 .

[105]  Stefano Clò,et al.  Grandfathering, auctioning and Carbon Leakage: Assessing the inconsistencies of the new ETS Directive , 2010 .

[106]  Dorotea López Giral,et al.  "The collapse of global trade, murky protectionism, and the crisis: recommendations for the G20": Richard Baldwin y Simon Evenett (eds.), vers. digital , 2009 .

[107]  Xin Wang,et al.  Can Unilateral Trade Measures Significantly Reduce Leakage and Competitiveness Pressures on EU-ETS-Constrained Industries? The Case of China Export Taxes and VAT Rebates , 2009 .

[108]  Edward J. Balistreri,et al.  The role of border carbon adjustment in unilateral climate policy: Overview of an Energy Modeling Forum study (EMF 29) , 2012 .

[109]  C. Perthuis,et al.  Pricing Carbon: The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme , 2010 .

[110]  Karl W. Steininger,et al.  Justice and cost effectiveness of consumption-based versus production-based approaches in the case of unilateral climate policies , 2014 .

[111]  E. Hertwich,et al.  Post-Kyoto greenhouse gas inventories: production versus consumption , 2008 .

[112]  Andreas Löschel,et al.  The Value-Added of Sectoral Disaggregation: Implications on Competitive Consequences of Climate Change Policies , 2012 .

[113]  Michael Jakob,et al.  Interpreting trade-related CO 2 emission transfers , 2013 .