Minimising damage in high resolution scanning transmission electron microscope images of nanoscale structures and processes.

Beam damage caused during acquisition of the highest resolution images is the current limitation in the vast majority of experiments performed in a scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM). While the principles behind the processes of knock-on and radiolysis damage are well-known (as are other contributing effects, such as heat and electric fields), understanding how and especially when beam damage is distributed across the entire sample volume during an experiment has not been examined in detail. Here we use standard models for damage and diffusion to elucidate how beam damage spreads across the sample as a function of the microscope conditions to determine an "optimum" sampling approach that maximises the high-resolution information in any image acquisition. We find that the standard STEM approach of scanning an image sequentially accelerates damage because of increased overlap of diffusion processes. These regions of accelerated damage can be significantly decelerated by increasing the distance between the acquired pixels in the scan, forming a "spotscan" mode of acquisition. The optimum distance between these pixels can be broadly defined by the fundamental properties of each material, allowing experiments to be designed for specific beam sensitive materials. As an added bonus, if we use inpainting to reconstruct the sparse distribution of pixels in the image we can significantly increase the speed of the STEM process, allowing dynamic phenomena, and the onset of damage, to be studied directly.

[1]  B. L. Mehdi,et al.  Controlling the spatio-temporal dose distribution during STEM imaging by subsampled acquisition: In-situ observations of kinetic processes in liquids , 2019, Applied Physics Letters.

[2]  Renu Sharma,et al.  In situ oxidation and reduction of cerium dioxide nanoparticles studied by scanning transmission electron microscopy. , 2018, Micron.

[3]  B. L. Mehdi,et al.  A sub-sampled approach to extremely low-dose STEM , 2018 .

[4]  Songquan Wu,et al.  Considerable knock-on displacement of metal atoms under a low energy electron beam , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[5]  N. Browning,et al.  Implementing an accurate and rapid sparse sampling approach for low-dose atomic resolution STEM imaging , 2016 .

[6]  G. Bondarenko,et al.  Determination of the vacancy migration energy in FCC metals with allowance for the relaxation of the nearest atoms , 2015, Russian Metallurgy (Metally).

[7]  N. Browning,et al.  Factors influencing quantitative liquid (scanning) transmission electron microscopy. , 2014, Chemical communications.

[8]  L. Carin,et al.  The potential for Bayesian compressive sensing to significantly reduce electron dose in high-resolution STEM images. , 2014, Microscopy.

[9]  R. Egerton Control of radiation damage in the TEM. , 2013, Ultramicroscopy.

[10]  Q. Ramasse,et al.  High-resolution low-dose scanning transmission electron microscopy. , 2010, Journal of electron microscopy.

[11]  Yu Zhu,et al.  Transmission Electron Microscopy , 2008 .

[12]  M. Malac,et al.  Radiation damage in the TEM and SEM. , 2004, Micron.

[13]  P. Nellist,et al.  Towards sub-0.5 A electron beams. , 2003, Ultramicroscopy.

[14]  O. L. Krivanek,et al.  Sub-ångstrom resolution using aberration corrected electron optics , 2002, Nature.

[15]  M. Nastasi,et al.  Ion–solid Interactions: Frontmatter , 1996 .

[16]  Edward L Cussler,et al.  Diffusion: Mass Transfer in Fluid Systems , 1984 .

[17]  Diffusion: Mass Transfer in Fluid Systems , 1984 .

[18]  M. Isaacson,et al.  Electron beam excitation and damage of biological molecules; its implications for specimen damage in electron microscopy. , 1973, Radiation research.

[19]  P. Wynblatt Calculation of the vacancy migration energy in cubic crystals , 1967 .

[20]  I. Jones Chemical microanalysis using electron beams , 1992 .

[21]  David C. Joy,et al.  Principles of Analytical Electron Microscopy , 1986, Springer US.