What do numerical (climate) models really represent

Abstract The translation of a mathematical model into a numerical one employs various modifications in order to make the model accessible for computation. Such modifications include discretizations, approximations, heuristic assumptions, and other methods. The paper investigates the divergent styles of mathematical and numerical models in the case of a specific piece of code in a current atmospheric model. Cognizance of these modifications means that the question of the role and function of scientific models has to be reworked. Neither are numerical models pure intermediaries between theory and data, nor are they autonomous tools of inquiry. Instead, theory and data are transformed into a new symbolic form of research due to the fact that computation has become an essential requirement for every scientific practice. Therefore the question is posed: What do numerical (climate) models really represent?

[1]  D. Dowling.  Experimenting on Theories , 1999, Science in Context.

[2]  Sergio Sismondo.  Models, Simulations, and Their Objects , 1999 .

[3]  Paul Humphreys,et al.  Extending Ourselves: Computational Science, Empiricism, and Scientific Method , 2004 .

[4]  Johann Feichter,et al.  Climate Change and Policy , 2011 .

[5]  Leslie Burkholder.  Philosophy and the Computer , 1992 .

[6]  P. D. Lax.  The Flowering of Applied Mathematics in America , 1989, SIAM Rev..

[7]  Vilhelm Bjerknes,et al.  The problem of weather prediction, considered from the viewpoints of mechanics and physics , 2009 .

[8]  W. Parker.  II—Wendy S. Parker: Confirmation and adequacy-for-Purpose in Climate Modelling , 2009 .

[9]  Wendy S. Parker,et al.  Understanding Pluralism in Climate Modeling , 2006 .

[10]  E. Cassirer,et al.  The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms , 2021 .

[11]  Johann Feichter,et al.  Climate change and policy : the calculability of climate change and the challenge of uncertainty , 2011 .

[12]  Axel Gelfert,et al.  Mathematical formalisms in scientific practice: From denotation to model-based representation , 2011 .

[13]  Akio Arakawa,et al.  CLOUDS AND CLIMATE: A PROBLEM THAT REFUSES TO DIE. Clouds of many , 2022 .

[14]  Sybille Krämer.  Berechenbare Vernunft: Kalkül und Rationalismus im 17. Jahrhundert , 1991 .

[15]  David Alan Grier,et al.  When computers were human , 2005 .

[16]  Johannes Lenhard.  Artificial, False, and Performing Well , 2011 .

[17]  M. Čurić,et al.  History of meteorology , 2006 .

[18]  Marion Vorms,et al.  Representing with imaginary models: formats matter , 2011 .

[19]  Lewis F. Richardson,et al.  Weather Prediction by Numerical Process , 1922 .

[20]  Robert Marc Friedman.  Appropriating the Weather: Vilhelm Bjerknes and the Construction of a Modern Meteorology , 1989 .

[21]  F. Nebeker.  Calculating the weather : meteorology in the 20th century , 1997 .

[22]  Herman Heine Goldstine,et al.  A History of Numerical Analysis from the 16th through the 19th Century. , 1976 .

[23]  Norman A. Phillips,et al.  The general circulation of the atmosphere: A numerical experiment , 1956 .

[24]  John von Neumann.  The NORC and Problems in High-Speed Computing , 1981, Annals of the History of Computing.

[25]  David A. Randall.  General circulation model development , 2000 .

[26]  Bas C. van Fraassen,et al.  The Scientific Image , 1980 .

[27]  Akio Arakawa,et al.  Chapter 1 - A Personal Perspective on the Early Years of General Circulation Modeling at UCLA , 2000 .