Configuration-dependent diffusion can shift the kinetic transition state and barrier height of protein folding

We show that diffusion can play an important role in protein-folding kinetics. We explicitly calculate the diffusion coefficient of protein folding in a lattice model. We found that diffusion typically is configuration- or reaction coordinate-dependent. The diffusion coefficient is found to be decreasing with respect to the progression of folding toward the native state, which is caused by the collapse to a compact state constraining the configurational space for exploration. The configuration- or position-dependent diffusion coefficient has a significant contribution to the kinetics in addition to the thermodynamic free-energy barrier. It effectively changes (increases in this case) the kinetic barrier height as well as the position of the corresponding transition state and therefore modifies the folding kinetic rates as well as the kinetic routes. The resulting folding time, by considering both kinetic diffusion and the thermodynamic folding free-energy profile, thus is slower than the estimation from the thermodynamic free-energy barrier with constant diffusion but is consistent with the results from kinetic simulations. The configuration- or coordinate-dependent diffusion is especially important with respect to fast folding, when there is a small or no free-energy barrier and kinetics is controlled by diffusion. Including the configurational dependence will challenge the transition state theory of protein folding. The classical transition state theory will have to be modified to be consistent. The more detailed folding mechanistic studies involving phi value analysis based on the classical transition state theory also will have to be modified quantitatively.

[1]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Specific and nonspecific collapse in protein folding funnels. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[2]  T. Oas,et al.  Structure and stability of monomeric lambda repressor: NMR evidence for two-state folding. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[3]  T. Oas,et al.  Submillisecond folding of monomeric lambda repressor. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  X. Xie,et al.  Statistical approaches for probing single-molecule dynamics photon-by-photon , 2002 .

[5]  Hue Sun Chan,et al.  History-dependent phenomena in the transverse Ising ferroglass: The free-energy landscape , 2000 .

[6]  Martin Gruebele,et al.  Rate−Temperature Relationships in λ-Repressor Fragment λ6-85 Folding† , 2004 .

[7]  José N Onuchic,et al.  Probing the kinetics of single molecule protein folding. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[8]  A. Fersht,et al.  The structure of the transition state for folding of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2 analysed by protein engineering methods: evidence for a nucleation-condensation mechanism for protein folding. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  H. Nguyen,et al.  Tuning the free-energy landscape of a WW domain by temperature, mutation, and truncation , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Wolynes,et al.  Statistics of kinetic pathways on biased rough energy landscapes with applications to protein folding. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[11]  A. Berezhkovskii,et al.  Activated rate processes: Generalization of the Kramers–Grote–Hynes and Langer theories , 1992 .

[12]  J. Onuchic,et al.  DIFFUSIVE DYNAMICS OF THE REACTION COORDINATE FOR PROTEIN FOLDING FUNNELS , 1996, cond-mat/9601091.

[13]  Hue Sun Chan,et al.  Towards a consistent modeling of protein thermodynamic and kinetic cooperativity: how applicable is the transition state picture to folding and unfolding? , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  M. Gruebele,et al.  Folding λ-repressor at its speed limit , 2004 .

[15]  E. Shakhnovich,et al.  Engineering of stable and fast-folding sequences of model proteins. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Folding time predictions from all-atom replica exchange simulations. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  Everett A Lipman,et al.  Single-Molecule Measurement of Protein Folding Kinetics , 2003, Science.

[18]  P. Wolynes,et al.  Intermediates and barrier crossing in a random energy model , 1989 .

[19]  Benjamin Schuler,et al.  Ultrafast dynamics of protein collapse from single-molecule photon statistics , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Eugene I. Shakhnovich,et al.  Free energy landscape for protein folding kinetics: Intermediates, traps, and multiple pathways in theory and lattice model simulations , 1994 .

[21]  H. Frauenfelder,et al.  Conformational substates in proteins. , 1988, Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[22]  Zaida Ann Luthey-Schulten,et al.  Variations in the fast folding rates of the λ-repressor: A hybrid molecular dynamics study , 2004 .

[23]  P. Wolynes,et al.  The energy landscapes and motions of proteins. , 1991, Science.

[24]  M. Gruebele,et al.  Observation of strange kinetics in protein folding. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Kinetic and thermodynamic analysis of proteinlike heteropolymers: Monte Carlo histogram technique , 1995, chem-ph/9507003.

[26]  Haw Yang,et al.  Probing single-molecule dynamics photon by photon , 2002 .

[27]  G. Voth,et al.  A theory for the activated barrier crossing rate constant in systems influenced by space and time dependent friction , 1994 .

[28]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Topological and energetic factors: what determines the structural details of the transition state ensemble and "en-route" intermediates for protein folding? An investigation for small globular proteins. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  H. Eyring The Activated Complex in Chemical Reactions , 1935 .

[30]  Flavio Seno,et al.  Variational Approach to Protein Design and Extraction of Interaction Potentials , 1998, cond-mat/9804054.

[31]  Yaoqi Zhou,et al.  Temperature dependence of the distribution of the first passage time: results from discontinuous molecular dynamics simulations of an all-atom model of the second beta-hairpin fragment of protein G. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[32]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Classical and quantum pictures of reaction dynamics in condensed matter: resonances, dephasing, and all that , 1988 .

[33]  Gerhard Hummer,et al.  Position-dependent diffusion coefficients and free energies from Bayesian analysis of equilibrium and replica molecular dynamics simulations , 2005 .

[34]  M. Gruebele,et al.  Kinetics are probe-dependent during downhill folding of an engineered λ6–85 protein , 2005 .

[35]  Gerhard Hummer,et al.  Diffusion and electrophoretic mobility of single-stranded RNA from molecular dynamics simulations. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[36]  H. Kramers Brownian motion in a field of force and the diffusion model of chemical reactions , 1940 .

[37]  Lisa J Lapidus,et al.  How fast is protein hydrophobic collapse? , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Funnels, pathways, and the energy landscape of protein folding: A synthesis , 1994, Proteins.

[39]  James T. Hynes,et al.  The stable states picture of chemical reactions. II. Rate constants for condensed and gas phase reaction models , 1980 .

[40]  J. Hofrichter,et al.  Sub-microsecond protein folding. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[41]  Gerhard Hummer,et al.  System-Size Dependence of Diffusion Coefficients and Viscosities from Molecular Dynamics Simulations with Periodic Boundary Conditions , 2004 .

[42]  Martin Gruebele,et al.  Folding at the speed limit , 2003, Nature.

[43]  Scaling of Folding Properties in Simple Models of Proteins , 1999, cond-mat/9907269.

[44]  Seishi Shimizu,et al.  Cooperativity principles in protein folding. , 2004, Methods in enzymology.

[45]  Jin Wang,et al.  The complex kinetics of protein folding in wide temperature ranges. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[46]  Gerhard Hummer,et al.  Diffusive model of protein folding dynamics with Kramers turnover in rate. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[47]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  LINKING RATES OF FOLDING IN LATTICE MODELS OF PROTEINS WITH UNDERLYING THERMODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS , 1998, cond-mat/9805061.

[48]  G. Voth,et al.  Reaction‐coordinate‐dependent friction in classical activated barrier crossing dynamics: When it matters and when it doesn’t , 1995 .

[49]  George Stell,et al.  First-passage time distribution and non-Markovian diffusion dynamics of protein folding , 2002, cond-mat/0206395.

[50]  W. Eaton,et al.  Probing the free-energy surface for protein folding with single-molecule fluorescence spectroscopy , 2002, Nature.

[51]  K. Dill,et al.  Transition states and folding dynamics of proteins and heteropolymers , 1994 .

[52]  E. Shakhnovich,et al.  Chain Length Scaling of Protein Folding Time. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[53]  B. Berne,et al.  Variational transition-state theory for reaction rates in dissipative systems. , 1990 .