Is There Any Impact of University-Industry Knowledge Transfer on the Performance of Private Enterprises? An Empirical Analysis Based on Swiss Firm Data

This study investigates the impacts of a palette of Knowledge and Technology Transfer (KTT) activities (general information, educational and research activities, activities related with technical infrastructure, and consulting) (a) on several innovation indicators (a1) in the framework of an innovation equation with variables of endogenized KTT activities (overall activities, specific forms of activities) as additional determinants of innovation, and (a2) based on a matched-pairs analysis for several forms of KTT activities; (b) on labour productivity in the framework of a production function with endogenized KTT activities as an additional production factor. The data used in the study were collected by means of a survey of Swiss enterprises that took place at the beginning of 2005. We found that KTT activities improve the innovation performance of firms both in terms of R&D intensity and sales of innovative products. The positive effect of overall KTT activities can be traced back mainly to research and educational activities. This could be shown by several methods: the innovation equation approach with endogenized KTT variable as well as three matching methods. Further, KTT activities seem to exercise a positive influence on labour productivity both through a direct effect as well as through an indirect effect by raising the elasticity of R&D intensity with respect to labour productivity.

[1]  James J. Heckman,et al.  Characterizing Selection Bias Using Experimental Data , 1998 .

[2]  Marian Beise,et al.  Public research and industrial innovations in Germany , 1999 .

[3]  Alexander Kaufmann,et al.  Science–industry interaction in the process of innovation: the importance of boundary-crossing between systems , 2001 .

[4]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory , 2000 .

[5]  Luke Georghiou,et al.  Evaluating technology programs: tools and methods , 2000 .

[6]  Gary W. Matkin.  Technology Transfer and Public Policy , 1997 .

[7]  Yoshiaki Ogura,et al.  Is Academic Science Driving a Surge in Industrial Innovation? Evidence from Patent Citations , 2005 .

[8]  E. Mansfield.  Academic research and industrial innovation: An update of empirical findings1 , 1998 .

[9]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  Real Effects of Academic Research: Comment , 1992 .

[10]  Werner Bönte,et al.  Does federally financed business R&D matter for US productivity growth? , 2003 .

[11]  Spyros Arvanitis,et al.  The impact of firm size on innovative activity – an empirical analysis based on swiss firm data , 1997 .

[12]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  Knowledge complementarity and innovation , 1994 .

[13]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Do Subsidies to Commercial R&D Reduce Market Failures? Microeconomic Evaluation Studies , 1999 .

[14]  R. Halvorsen,et al.  The Interpretation of Dummy Variables in Semilogarithmic Equations , 1980 .

[15]  Giuseppe Medda,et al.  University R&D and Firm Productivity: Evidence from Italy , 2004 .

[16]  M. Fritsch,et al.  Innovation, regional knowledge spillovers and R&D cooperation , 2004 .

[17]  Wolfgang Becker,et al.  Evaluation of the Role of Universities in the Innovation Process , 2003 .

[18]  D. Rubin.  Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys , 1989 .

[19]  Theofanis P. Mamuneas,et al.  Spillovers from publicly financed R&D capital in high-tech industries , 1999 .

[20]  Mita Bhattacharya,et al.  Determinants of Innovation , 2004 .

[21]  Laurent Donzé.  L'imputation des données manquantes, la technique de l'imputation multiple, les conséquences sur l'analyse des données: l'enquête 1999 KOF/ETHZ sur l'innovation , 2001 .

[22]  Bruno Van Pottelsberghe,et al.  The impact of public R&D expenditure on business R&D* , 2003 .

[23]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  Institutions Supporting Technical Advance in Industry , 1986 .

[24]  Spyros Arvanitis,et al.  Industrial Innovation in Switzerland: A Model-based Analysis with Survey Data , 1996 .

[25]  Werner Bönte,et al.  Spillovers from publicly financed business R&D: some empirical evidence from Germany , 2004 .

[26]  Luigi Benfratello,et al.  Research Joint Ventures and Firm Level Performance , 2002 .

[27]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  On the Sources and Significance of Interindustry Differences in Technological Opportunities , 1995 .

[28]  A. Jaffe.  Real Effects of Academic Research , 1989 .

[29]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Academic research and industrial innovation , 1991 .

[30]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[31]  Patrick Waelbroeck,et al.  Assessing spillovers from universities to firms: evidence from French firm-level data , 2003 .

[32]  Anders Sørensen,et al.  R&D, public innovation policy, and productivity: The case of danish manufacturing , 2003 .

[33]  Jeffrey L. Jensen,et al.  The Influence of Federal Laboratory R&D on Industrial Research , 2000, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[34]  Spyros Arvanitis,et al.  The Impact of Spillovers and Knowledge Heterogeneity on Firm Performance: Evidence from Swiss Manufacturing , 2002 .