Evaluation of low-exergy heating and cooling systems and topology optimization for deep energy savings at the urban district level

Abstract District energy systems have the potential to achieve deep energy savings by leveraging the density and diversity of loads in urban districts. However, planning and adoption of district thermal energy systems is hindered by the analytical burden and high infrastructure costs. It is hypothesized that network topology optimization would enable wider adoption of advanced (ambient temperature) district thermal energy systems, resulting in energy savings. In this study, energy modeling is used to compare the energy performance of “conventional” and “advanced” district thermal energy systems at the urban district level, and a partial exhaustive search is used to evaluate a heuristic for the topology optimization problem. For the prototypical district considered, advanced district thermal energy systems mated with low-exergy building heating and cooling systems achieved a source energy use intensity that was 49% lower than that of conventional systems. The minimal spanning tree heuristic was demonstrated to be effective for the network topology optimization problem in the context of a prototypical district, and contributes to mitigating the problem’s computational complexity. The work presented in this paper demonstrates the potential of advanced district thermal energy systems to achieve deep energy savings, and advances to addressing barriers to their adoption through topology optimization.

[1]  Svend Svendsen,et al.  The status of 4th generation district heating: Research and results , 2018, Energy.

[2]  Gregor P. Henze,et al.  Development of a topology analysis tool for fifth-generation district heating and cooling networks , 2019, Energy Conversion and Management.

[3]  Neven Duić,et al.  Future district heating systems and technologies: On the role of smart energy systems and 4th generation district heating , 2018, Energy.

[4]  Adriano Sciacovelli,et al.  Topology Optimization of Robust District Heating Networks , 2018 .

[5]  Svend Svendsen,et al.  District Heating Network Design and Configuration Optimization with Genetic Algorithm , 2013 .

[6]  Student Member Ashrae,et al.  Experimental Validation of the EnergyPius Low-Temperature Radiant Simulation , 2003 .

[7]  P. O. Fanger,et al.  Thermal comfort: analysis and applications in environmental engineering, , 1972 .

[8]  Jean-Michel Reneaume,et al.  A MINLP optimization of the configuration and the design of a district heating network: study case on an existing site , 2017 .

[9]  Gregor P. Henze,et al.  Primary energy and comfort performance of ventilation assisted thermo-active building systems in continental climates , 2008 .

[10]  Sylvain Serra,et al.  A MINLP optimization of the configuration and the design of a district heating network: Academic study cases , 2016 .

[11]  Luigi Crema,et al.  Designing optimized energy scenarios for an Italian Alpine valley: the case of Giudicarie Esteriori , 2016 .

[12]  Gregor P. Henze,et al.  Evaluation of temperature degradation in hydraulic flow networks , 2011 .