Controlling for Common Method Variance with Partial Least Squares Path modeling: A Monte Carlo Study

[1]  Wynne W. Chin.  The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[2]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[3]  J. Wilcox,et al.  Reconsidering formative measurement. , 2007, Psychological methods.

[4]  C Loehlin John,et al.  Latent variable models: an introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis , 1986 .

[5]  Amy B. Woszczynski,et al.  The Problem of Common Method Variance in IS Research , 2004 .

[6]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[7]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic - Mail Emotion/Adoption Study , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[8]  T. Little,et al.  On selecting indicators for multivariate measurement and modeling with latent variables: When "good" indicators are bad and "bad" indicators are good. , 1999 .

[9]  J. Nunnally.  Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[10]  Jun Ye,et al.  Strategic Change Implementation and Performance Loss in the Front Lines , 2007 .

[11]  A. Burton-Jones.  Minimizing Method Bias Through Programmatic Research , 2009 .

[12]  Rudolf R. Sinkovics,et al.  The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing , 2009 .

[13]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Monte Carlo Experiments: Design and Implementation , 2001 .

[14]  Carol Saunders,et al.  PLS: A Silver Bullet? , 2006 .

[15]  Andrew Schwarz,et al.  Examining the “Urban Legend” of Common Method Bias: Nine Common Errors and Their Impact , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[16]  S. Wold.  Cross-Validatory Estimation of the Number of Components in Factor and Principal Components Models , 1978 .

[17]  Claudia van Oppen,et al.  USING PLS PATH MODELING FOR ASSESSING HIERARCHICAL CONSTRUCT MODELS : GUIDELINES AND EMPIRICAL , 2022 .

[18]  Markku V. J. Maula.  Corporate venture capital and the value-added for technology-based new firms , 2001 .

[19]  Bradley J. Alge,et al.  Information privacy in organizations: empowering creative and extrarole performance. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[20]  H W Marsh,et al.  Is More Ever Too Much? The Number of Indicators per Factor in Confirmatory Factor Analysis. , 1998, Multivariate behavioral research.

[21]  Martin Wetzels,et al.  A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[22]  Niels G Waller,et al.  The path analysis controversy: a new statistical approach to strong appraisal of verisimilitude. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[23]  Gregory R. Hancock,et al.  Structural equation modeling : a second course , 2006 .

[24]  William P. Dunlap,et al.  Partialling Factor Scores Does Not Control Method Variance: A Reply to Podsakoff and Todor , 1986 .

[25]  Kevin Zhu,et al.  Research Note - Information Technology in Supply Chains: The Value of IT-Enabled Resources Under Competition , 2009, Inf. Syst. Res..

[26]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Validation Guidelines for IS Positivist Research , 2004, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Assessing Between-Group Differences in Information Systems Research: A Comparison of Covariance-and Component-Based SEM , 2009, MIS Q..

[28]  M. Lindell,et al.  Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[29]  Larry J. Williams,et al.  Method Variance in Organizational Behavior and Human Resources Research: Effects on Correlations, Path Coefficients, and Hypothesis Testing , 1994 .

[30]  Rajeev Sharma,et al.  Estimating the effect of common method variance: the method-method pair technique with an illustration from TAM research , 2009 .

[31]  Wynne W. Chin.  Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling by , 2009 .

[32]  G. A. Marcoulides,et al.  A First Course in Structural Equation Modeling , 2000 .

[33]  Marcia J. Simmering,et al.  A Tale of Three Perspectives , 2009 .

[34]  Cheryl Burke Jarvis,et al.  The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[35]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[36]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A critical look at partial least squares modeling , 2009 .

[37]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  From IT Leveraging Competence to Competitive Advantage in Turbulent Environments: The Case of New Product Development , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[38]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[39]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  Common Method Variance in IS Research: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches and a Reanalysis of Past Research , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[40]  Jagdip Singh,et al.  Curvilinear Effects of Consumer Loyalty Determinants in Relational Exchanges , 2005 .

[41]  Pamela Paxton.  TEACHER ’ S CORNER Monte Carlo Experiments : Design and Implementation , 2001 .

[42]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Understanding and Mitigating Uncertainty in Online Exchange Relationships: A Principal-Agent Perspective , 2007, MIS Q..