Sparse reconstruction-based underwater source localization using co-prime arrays

Traditional matched-field processing (MFP) techniques for underwater source localization such as Bartlett and Minimum variance Distortionless Response (MVDR) suffer from low resolution and sensitivity to environment/system mismatch respectively. This paper considers the problem of underwater source location estimation using a combination of sparsity imposed reconstruction method with newly proposed structure of non-uniform linear sensor arrays, regarded as co-prime arrays. This combination overcomes the above mentioned drawbacks of the traditional methods. Co-prime arrays consist of two subarrays with M and N sensors respectively. By using co-prim arrays the degree of freedom can be increased from O(N) to O(MN). It is a general observation that sparse reconstruction algorithms exhibit high computational workload. To reduce this burden, we use Bartlett for initial estimation as Bartlett is known as robust but low resolution method. The sparsity based algorithms discretize the range of concern onto a grid and off-grid sources can lead to mismatches in the model and weaken the performance notably. In this work we apply the joint sparse recovery method to reduce the off-grid mismatches. It is observed with the help of numerical examples that the proposed method has a number of advantages over other existing methods, such as high resolution, robust estimation and less off-grid mismatches.

[1]  Peter Gerstoft,et al.  Null broadening with snapshot-deficient covariance matrices in passive sonar , 2003 .

[2]  P. Vaidyanathan,et al.  Coprime sampling and the music algorithm , 2011, 2011 Digital Signal Processing and Signal Processing Education Meeting (DSP/SPE).

[3]  Justin K. Romberg,et al.  Compressive Matched-Field Processing , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  H. Cox,et al.  Passive sonar limits upon nulling multiple moving ships with large aperture arrays , 1999, Conference Record of the Thirty-Third Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers (Cat. No.CH37020).

[5]  P. P. Vaidyanathan,et al.  Nested Arrays: A Novel Approach to Array Processing With Enhanced Degrees of Freedom , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[6]  Wen Xu,et al.  Performance Bounds on Matched-Field Methods for Source Localization and Estimation of Ocean Environmental Parameters , 2001 .

[7]  P. P. Vaidyanathan,et al.  Sparse Sensing With Co-Prime Samplers and Arrays , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[8]  Arthur B. Baggeroer,et al.  An overview of matched field methods in ocean acoustics , 1993 .

[9]  David L Donoho,et al.  Compressed sensing , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[10]  Arye Nehorai,et al.  Joint Sparse Recovery Method for Compressed Sensing With Structured Dictionary Mismatches , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[11]  Braham Himed,et al.  Sparsity-based DOA estimation using co-prime arrays , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[12]  Wen Xu,et al.  Sparse-reconstruction-based high resolution beamforming and its application to multi-beam systems , 2012, 2012 Oceans - Yeosu.

[13]  Dmitry M. Malioutov,et al.  A sparse signal reconstruction perspective for source localization with sensor arrays , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[14]  Graeme Pope,et al.  Compressive sensing: a summary of reconstruction algorithms , 2009 .

[15]  J. Capon High-resolution frequency-wavenumber spectrum analysis , 1969 .